Ureteroiliac Fistula: Bleeding of Unknown Origin-Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Q4 Medicine Journal of Endourology Case Reports Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1089/cren.2020.0122
Victoria Muñoz Guillermo, Carlos Carrillo George, Daniel Jiménez Peralta, Bogdan Nicolae Pietricica, Tomás Fernández Aparicio
{"title":"Ureteroiliac Fistula: Bleeding of Unknown Origin-Case Report and Review of the Literature.","authors":"Victoria Muñoz Guillermo,&nbsp;Carlos Carrillo George,&nbsp;Daniel Jiménez Peralta,&nbsp;Bogdan Nicolae Pietricica,&nbsp;Tomás Fernández Aparicio","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Ureteroiliac fistula is a rare cause of gross hematuria and lateralizing flank pain. Risk factors include previous pelvic surgery, pelvic radiotherapy, or chronic ureteral stentings. Diagnosis is challenging and requires arteriography and ureteroscopy. Management ranges from open surgery to minimally invasive means such as the use of an endovascular stent. <b><i>Case Report:</i></b> A 62-year-old man with postradical cystoprostatectomy and cutaneous ureterostomy presented an intermittent gross hematuria with anemia that required blood transfusions. Some CT arteriographies were performed but none of them could identify the bleeding origin. Therefore, a flexible ureteroscopy was performed that showed a left ureteroiliac fistula. Subsequently, an endovascular stent was placed in the left common iliac without complications. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The ureteroiliac fistula is a life-threatening condition. CT arteriography or ureteroscopy might help in the diagnosis but the sensitivity is ∼64%. Arteriography with endovascular stenting is a viable and safe option. However, because of its rarity, long-term durable benefits still need to be documented.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"413-415"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803251/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Ureteroiliac fistula is a rare cause of gross hematuria and lateralizing flank pain. Risk factors include previous pelvic surgery, pelvic radiotherapy, or chronic ureteral stentings. Diagnosis is challenging and requires arteriography and ureteroscopy. Management ranges from open surgery to minimally invasive means such as the use of an endovascular stent. Case Report: A 62-year-old man with postradical cystoprostatectomy and cutaneous ureterostomy presented an intermittent gross hematuria with anemia that required blood transfusions. Some CT arteriographies were performed but none of them could identify the bleeding origin. Therefore, a flexible ureteroscopy was performed that showed a left ureteroiliac fistula. Subsequently, an endovascular stent was placed in the left common iliac without complications. Conclusion: The ureteroiliac fistula is a life-threatening condition. CT arteriography or ureteroscopy might help in the diagnosis but the sensitivity is ∼64%. Arteriography with endovascular stenting is a viable and safe option. However, because of its rarity, long-term durable benefits still need to be documented.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
输尿管髂瘘:不明原因出血1例报告及文献复习。
背景:输尿管髂瘘是引起肉眼血尿和侧腹疼痛的罕见原因。危险因素包括既往盆腔手术、盆腔放疗或慢性输尿管支架置入。诊断具有挑战性,需要动脉造影和输尿管镜检查。治疗范围从开放手术到微创手段,如使用血管内支架。病例报告:62岁男性膀胱前列腺切除术和皮肤输尿管造口术后出现间歇性肉眼血尿伴贫血,需要输血。进行了一些CT动脉造影检查,但都不能确定出血的来源。因此,柔性输尿管镜检查显示左侧输尿管髂瘘。随后,血管内支架放置在左髂总,无并发症。结论:输尿管髂瘘是危及生命的疾病。CT动脉造影或输尿管镜检查可能有助于诊断,但敏感性约为64%。血管内支架植入术是一种可行且安全的选择。然而,由于它的罕见性,长期持久的益处仍然需要证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Complication of Amplatz Sheath: Amplatz Sheath Rupture During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Patient's Fear of Being Infected, Another Complication of COVID-19 Outbreak: A Lesson Learned from a Case of Life-Threatening Urolithiasis. Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Renal Pelvis. Endoscopic Management of Chyluria Caused by Pyelolymphatic Fistula After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Ureteroiliac Fistula: Bleeding of Unknown Origin-Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1