Differential Association between Actual and Perceived Obesity between African Americans and Whites in the United States.

International journal of epidemiologic research Pub Date : 2020-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-09-28
Shervin Assari
{"title":"Differential Association between Actual and Perceived Obesity between African Americans and Whites in the United States.","authors":"Shervin Assari","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Although actual and perceived obesity are associated, some research has shown that this association may differ across racial and ethnic groups. Accordingly, this cross-sectional study tested racial differences regarding the association between actual and perceived obesity among American adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5- Cycle 3) is a representative survey of American adults conducted in 2019. A total number of 3731 adults entered our analysis, including 3054 (81.9%) non-Hispanic Whites and 677 (18.1%) African Americans (AAs). The independent variable was actual obesity, which was defined as a body mass index of 30 or greater. The outcome was perceived as obesity. In addition, age, gender, marital status, education, and income were considered as control variables (confounders), and the race was the focal effect modifier. Finally, logistic regressions without and with interaction terms were utilized to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, actual and perceived obesity were associated, with obese individuals having higher odds of seeing themselves as obese (odds ratio [OR]=25.82, 95% CI=18.58-35.89, P< 0.001), indicating a weaker link between the two for AAs compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Race-stratified models also confirmed the same pattern with the actual and perceived obesity, showing a weaker association for AAs (OR=15.61, 95% CI=9.53-25.59, P<0.001 in comparison with non-Hispanic Whites (OR=46.23, 95% CI=27.01-709.14, P P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AAs compared to non-Hispanic Whites differed in the effect of their actual obesity on their perceived obesity. This may explain the looser association of obesity and depression in AAs as compared to Whites.</p>","PeriodicalId":73448,"journal":{"name":"International journal of epidemiologic research","volume":"7 3","pages":"107-114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of epidemiologic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Although actual and perceived obesity are associated, some research has shown that this association may differ across racial and ethnic groups. Accordingly, this cross-sectional study tested racial differences regarding the association between actual and perceived obesity among American adults.

Methods: The Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5- Cycle 3) is a representative survey of American adults conducted in 2019. A total number of 3731 adults entered our analysis, including 3054 (81.9%) non-Hispanic Whites and 677 (18.1%) African Americans (AAs). The independent variable was actual obesity, which was defined as a body mass index of 30 or greater. The outcome was perceived as obesity. In addition, age, gender, marital status, education, and income were considered as control variables (confounders), and the race was the focal effect modifier. Finally, logistic regressions without and with interaction terms were utilized to analyze the data.

Results: Overall, actual and perceived obesity were associated, with obese individuals having higher odds of seeing themselves as obese (odds ratio [OR]=25.82, 95% CI=18.58-35.89, P< 0.001), indicating a weaker link between the two for AAs compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Race-stratified models also confirmed the same pattern with the actual and perceived obesity, showing a weaker association for AAs (OR=15.61, 95% CI=9.53-25.59, P<0.001 in comparison with non-Hispanic Whites (OR=46.23, 95% CI=27.01-709.14, P P<0.001).

Conclusion: AAs compared to non-Hispanic Whites differed in the effect of their actual obesity on their perceived obesity. This may explain the looser association of obesity and depression in AAs as compared to Whites.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国非裔美国人和白人之间实际肥胖和感知肥胖之间的差异关系。
背景和目的:虽然实际肥胖和感知肥胖是相关的,但一些研究表明,这种关联可能在种族和民族群体中有所不同。因此,这项横断面研究测试了美国成年人实际肥胖和感知肥胖之间的种族差异。方法:健康信息全国趋势调查(提示5-周期3)是2019年对美国成年人进行的具有代表性的调查。共有3731名成年人进入我们的分析,其中包括3054名(81.9%)非西班牙裔白人和677名(18.1%)非洲裔美国人(AAs)。独立变量是实际肥胖,定义为体重指数大于等于30。结果被认为是肥胖。此外,年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度和收入作为控制变量(混杂因素),种族是焦点效应修饰因子。最后,利用无交互项和有交互项的逻辑回归对数据进行分析。结果:总体而言,实际肥胖和感知肥胖是相关的,肥胖个体认为自己肥胖的几率更高(比值比[OR]=25.82, 95% CI=18.58-35.89, P< 0.001),表明与非西班牙裔白人相比,两者之间的联系较弱。种族分层模型也证实了与实际肥胖和感知肥胖相同的模式,表明AAs的相关性较弱(OR=15.61, 95% CI=9.53-25.59, p)。结论:AAs与非西班牙裔白人相比,其实际肥胖对其感知肥胖的影响存在差异。这也许可以解释为什么与白人相比,黑人的肥胖和抑郁之间的联系更少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association of Severe Outcomes With Underlying Diseases Among Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Towards COVID-19 in Iran: A Population-Based Study The Role of Age Groups in Improving Life Expectancy of Iran During 1976-2016 Nucleus Accumbens Fractional Anisotropy and Children’s Body Mass Index: Moderating Role of Race and Family Income Is There a Need to Assess the Health Status of School-Age Students When Reopening Schools Following the COVID-19 Pandemic?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1