The Effect of Feedback on Surgeon Performance: A Narrative Review.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2020-10-19 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2020/3746908
Kelsey A Rankin, Jordan Brand, Daniel H Wiznia
{"title":"The Effect of Feedback on Surgeon Performance: A Narrative Review.","authors":"Kelsey A Rankin,&nbsp;Jordan Brand,&nbsp;Daniel H Wiznia","doi":"10.1155/2020/3746908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgeons play a critical role in the healthcare community and provide a service that can tremendously impact patients' livelihood. However, there are relatively few means for monitoring surgeons' performance quality and seeking improvement. Surgeon-level data provide an important metric for quality improvement and future training. A narrative review was conducted to analyze the utility of providing surgeons direct feedback on their individual performance. The articles selected identified means of collecting surgeon-specific data, suggested ways to report this information, identified pertinent gaps in the field, and concluded the results of giving feedback to surgeons. There is a relative sparsity of data pertaining to the effect of providing surgeons with information regarding their individual performance. However, the literature available does suggest that providing surgeons with individualized feedback can help make meaningful improvements in the quality of practice and can be done in a way that is safe for the surgeons' reputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"2020 ","pages":"3746908"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2020/3746908","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3746908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Surgeons play a critical role in the healthcare community and provide a service that can tremendously impact patients' livelihood. However, there are relatively few means for monitoring surgeons' performance quality and seeking improvement. Surgeon-level data provide an important metric for quality improvement and future training. A narrative review was conducted to analyze the utility of providing surgeons direct feedback on their individual performance. The articles selected identified means of collecting surgeon-specific data, suggested ways to report this information, identified pertinent gaps in the field, and concluded the results of giving feedback to surgeons. There is a relative sparsity of data pertaining to the effect of providing surgeons with information regarding their individual performance. However, the literature available does suggest that providing surgeons with individualized feedback can help make meaningful improvements in the quality of practice and can be done in a way that is safe for the surgeons' reputation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
反馈对外科医生表现的影响:一个叙述性的回顾。
外科医生在医疗保健社区中发挥着关键作用,提供的服务可以极大地影响患者的生计。然而,监测外科医生的手术质量并寻求改进的手段相对较少。外科医生水平的数据为质量改进和未来培训提供了重要的衡量标准。我们进行了一项叙述性的回顾,以分析向外科医生提供他们个人表现的直接反馈的效用。这些文章选择了收集外科特定数据的确定方法,建议了报告这些信息的方法,确定了该领域的相关空白,并总结了向外科医生提供反馈的结果。关于向外科医生提供有关其个人表现的信息的影响的数据相对较少。然而,现有的文献确实表明,为外科医生提供个性化的反馈有助于在实践质量方面做出有意义的改进,并且可以以一种对外科医生声誉安全的方式完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
期刊最新文献
Addressing Knee Osteoarthritis Pathology Through Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment: A Comprehensive Review. Is Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction "Silva Technique" Equal to All-Inside Techniques? A Prospective Single-Center Study: An Alternative ACL All-Inside Reconstruction Technique Using a Tibial Tunnel and Bone Graft. Implant Survival of an Uncemented Modular Femoral Implant in Patients With Severe Femoral Bone Loss and 2-Stage Hip Revision. Regular Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use Increases Stress Fracture Risk in the General Population: A Retrospective Case-Control Study. From Etiology to Intervention: A Holistic Review of Bunion Pathophysiology and Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1