Evaluation of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Clinical Management of Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Data from a Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.

IF 5.3 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biologics : Targets & Therapy Pub Date : 2020-10-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/BTT.S262511
Lise Pedersen, Pal Bela Szecsi, Per Birger Johansen, Poul Jannik Bjerrum
{"title":"Evaluation of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in the Clinical Management of Patients with Rheumatic Diseases: Data from a Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study.","authors":"Lise Pedersen,&nbsp;Pal Bela Szecsi,&nbsp;Per Birger Johansen,&nbsp;Poul Jannik Bjerrum","doi":"10.2147/BTT.S262511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Treatment of rheumatic diseases with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors leads to improved clinical outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may assist in guiding clinical decisions. This study investigates the impact of TDM on clinical outcome, decision-making and biologics cost expenditure.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In a retrospective observational study of 306 patients with rheumatic diseases treated with four different tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, drug levels and antidrug antibodies were measured over a period of one year. Primary outcomes were the clinicians' response to each TDM result and the clinical outcome two years after TDM initiation. Outcomes were compared between the 111 TDM-guided patients and the 195 empirically guided patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Treatment change occurred in 55% of the patients in the TDM group, but in only 38% in the empirically guided group. In the TDM group, 89 (79.5%) patients were in remission or had low disease activity after two years follow-up compared to 128 (65.6%) patients in the empirical group. The average cost of biologics per patient per year was lower in the TDM group than in the empirical group for patients receiving infliximab, adalimumab or etanercept at baseline but not for golimumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TDM-guided decision-making is useful in rheumatic patients receiving TNFi and may optimize therapeutic decisions, leading to a better control of disease activity. Proactive TDM may support decisions on dose tapering, resulting in lower drug consumption and biologics cost expenditure.</p>","PeriodicalId":9025,"journal":{"name":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/BTT.S262511","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologics : Targets & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/BTT.S262511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: Treatment of rheumatic diseases with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors leads to improved clinical outcomes. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may assist in guiding clinical decisions. This study investigates the impact of TDM on clinical outcome, decision-making and biologics cost expenditure.

Patients and methods: In a retrospective observational study of 306 patients with rheumatic diseases treated with four different tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, drug levels and antidrug antibodies were measured over a period of one year. Primary outcomes were the clinicians' response to each TDM result and the clinical outcome two years after TDM initiation. Outcomes were compared between the 111 TDM-guided patients and the 195 empirically guided patients.

Results: Treatment change occurred in 55% of the patients in the TDM group, but in only 38% in the empirically guided group. In the TDM group, 89 (79.5%) patients were in remission or had low disease activity after two years follow-up compared to 128 (65.6%) patients in the empirical group. The average cost of biologics per patient per year was lower in the TDM group than in the empirical group for patients receiving infliximab, adalimumab or etanercept at baseline but not for golimumab.

Conclusion: TDM-guided decision-making is useful in rheumatic patients receiving TNFi and may optimize therapeutic decisions, leading to a better control of disease activity. Proactive TDM may support decisions on dose tapering, resulting in lower drug consumption and biologics cost expenditure.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风湿性疾病患者临床管理中治疗药物监测的评价:来自回顾性单中心队列研究的数据
目的:用肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗风湿性疾病可改善临床预后。治疗药物监测(TDM)可以帮助指导临床决策。本研究探讨TDM对临床结果、决策和生物制剂成本支出的影响。患者和方法:在一项回顾性观察研究中,306例风湿病患者接受四种不同的肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗,在一年的时间内测量药物水平和抗药物抗体。主要结局是临床医生对每次TDM结果的反应以及TDM开始后两年的临床结局。比较tdm引导111例患者与经验引导195例患者的预后。结果:TDM组55%的患者发生了治疗改变,而经验引导组只有38%的患者发生了治疗改变。在TDM组中,89例(79.5%)患者在两年随访后病情缓解或疾病活动度较低,而在经验组中有128例(65.6%)患者。TDM组每位患者每年的生物制剂平均成本低于基线时接受英夫利昔单抗、阿达木单抗或依那西普治疗的试验组,但不接受戈利木单抗治疗。结论:tdm指导的决策对接受TNFi的风湿病患者有用,可以优化治疗决策,从而更好地控制疾病活动。主动TDM可能支持剂量逐渐减少的决定,从而降低药物消耗和生物制剂成本支出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biologics : Targets & Therapy
Biologics : Targets & Therapy MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Non-Surgical Management of Recurrent Naso-Orbital Hemangiomas with Bevacizumab: A Case Report. Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Tocilizumab in a Cohort of Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: An Italian Monocentric Retrospective Study. Exploring Anticancer Potential of Lactobacillus Strains: Insights into Cytotoxicity and Apoptotic Mechanisms on HCT 115 Cancer Cells. Silencing AREG Enhances Sensitivity to Irradiation by Suppressing the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway in Colorectal Cancer Cells. Preliminary Investigation and Therapeutic Efficacy Determination of a Novel Anti-IL-17A Antibody, Indikizumab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1