Managers' support on implementation of maternal guidelines, Limpopo province, South Africa.

Q2 Medicine Curationis Pub Date : 2020-10-21 DOI:10.4102/curationis.v43i1.1949
Ireen T Ramavhoya, Maria S Maputle, Dorah U Ramathuba, Rachel T Lebese, Lizzy M Netshikweta
{"title":"Managers' support on implementation of maternal guidelines, Limpopo province, South Africa.","authors":"Ireen T Ramavhoya, Maria S Maputle, Dorah U Ramathuba, Rachel T Lebese, Lizzy M Netshikweta","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v43i1.1949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The report of Saving Mothers indicated a decline of maternal mortality from 12.8% to 12.5% last triennium of 2017. This shows that regardless of availability of national maternal health guidelines, midwives and managers, 25% of maternal deaths were caused by preventable and avoidable factors. As such, support provided by managers is vital in promoting the utilisation of maternal guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective was to determine the support offered by managers to midwives during the implementation of maternal health guidelines.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study design was cross-sectional descriptive in a quantitative domain. Simple random sampling was used to select 58 operational managers and two maternal managers. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23. Descriptive statistics provided by Microsoft Excel in the form of charts was used to describe data. Pearson's correlation test was used to describe relationships amongst variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results revealed that 83.3% respondents indicated a shortage of staff to attend pregnant women. Fifty-six per cent of managers indicated that shortage of material resources contributed to substandard implementation of maternal guidelines. Supervision and monitoring of implementation of maternal guidelines was difficult as indicated by 53.3%, and 63.3% indicated lack of supervision.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Limited support in terms of monitoring and supervision by managers was strongly indicated as having a negative effect on implementation of maternal guidelines. Capacity building was offered; however, shortage of resources led to poor implementation of maternal guidelines by midwives.</p>","PeriodicalId":35715,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"43 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7669946/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v43i1.1949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The report of Saving Mothers indicated a decline of maternal mortality from 12.8% to 12.5% last triennium of 2017. This shows that regardless of availability of national maternal health guidelines, midwives and managers, 25% of maternal deaths were caused by preventable and avoidable factors. As such, support provided by managers is vital in promoting the utilisation of maternal guidelines.

Objectives: The objective was to determine the support offered by managers to midwives during the implementation of maternal health guidelines.

Method: The study design was cross-sectional descriptive in a quantitative domain. Simple random sampling was used to select 58 operational managers and two maternal managers. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 23. Descriptive statistics provided by Microsoft Excel in the form of charts was used to describe data. Pearson's correlation test was used to describe relationships amongst variables.

Results: The results revealed that 83.3% respondents indicated a shortage of staff to attend pregnant women. Fifty-six per cent of managers indicated that shortage of material resources contributed to substandard implementation of maternal guidelines. Supervision and monitoring of implementation of maternal guidelines was difficult as indicated by 53.3%, and 63.3% indicated lack of supervision.

Conclusion: Limited support in terms of monitoring and supervision by managers was strongly indicated as having a negative effect on implementation of maternal guidelines. Capacity building was offered; however, shortage of resources led to poor implementation of maternal guidelines by midwives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非林波波省管理人员对实施孕产妇指南的支持。
背景:拯救母亲》报告显示,孕产妇死亡率从 12.8%下降到 2017 年上一个三年期的 12.5%。这表明,无论是否有国家孕产妇保健指南、助产士和管理人员,25%的孕产妇死亡是由可预防和可避免的因素造成的。因此,管理者提供的支持对于促进孕产妇指南的使用至关重要:目的:确定在实施孕产妇保健指南的过程中,管理人员为助产士提供的支持:研究设计为定量领域的横截面描述性研究。研究采用简单随机抽样的方法,选取了 58 名业务经理和两名孕产妇经理。采用自填式问卷收集数据,并使用社会科学统计软件包第 23 版进行分析。使用 Microsoft Excel 提供的图表形式的描述性统计来描述数据。皮尔逊相关检验用于描述变量之间的关系:结果显示,83.3% 的受访者表示缺少照顾孕妇的工作人员。56% 的管理人员表示,物质资源短缺是导致孕产妇指南执行不达标的原因之一。53.3%的受访者表示很难监督和监测孕产妇指南的执行情况,63.3%的受访者表示缺乏监督:结论:管理人员在监测和监督方面提供的支持有限,这对孕产妇指南的实施产生了负面影响。然而,资源短缺导致助产士对孕产妇指南的执行不力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curationis
Curationis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identity work of public hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa Midwifery hurdles: Navigating tuberculosis screening challenges in South Africa Newly qualified professional nurses' experiences providing postoperative care to children in CTICU. Nurses' practices in stroke-related dysphagia in low- and middle-income countries. Guidelines to support newly qualified professional nurses for effective clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1