Autonomous-submissive orientations and aggression of students at a metropolitan university in South Africa: Mental health implications.

Q2 Medicine Curationis Pub Date : 2020-11-03 DOI:10.4102/curationis.v43i1.2142
Chris Myburgh, Marie Poggenpoel, Cornelius Fourie
{"title":"Autonomous-submissive orientations and aggression of students at a metropolitan university in South Africa: Mental health implications.","authors":"Chris Myburgh,&nbsp;Marie Poggenpoel,&nbsp;Cornelius Fourie","doi":"10.4102/curationis.v43i1.2142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Students are sometimes subjected to difficult circumstances to achieve success. Studying under these circumstances could cultivate aggression towards self and others, and the environment. Little, if any, published research is available dealing with students being orientated autonomous versus being submissive and perceptions of aggression.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore and describe the perceptions of groups of students being orientated autonomous versus students being submissive and perceptions of aggression. Recommendations concerning these two groups of students are made.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An exploratory quantitative research design that is descriptive and inferential in nature was applied. A questionnaire was electronically distributed to students in a faculty. The questionnaire consisted of items on biographic, personality and aggression. In the statistical analysis Cronbach's alphas, principal component analysis were done and hypotheses were tested on differences between students orientated autonomous and those being submissive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 266 completed questionnaires used, 177 were received from females and 89 from males. Eighty-two (82) of these were honours, masters or doctoral students. Findings reflected graded differences between students being autonomous and students being submissive orientated concerning Overt verbal aggression (means below 1.82), Overt physical aggression (means below 2.53) and aggressive inclination towards others (means below 3.01). The implications are that students are to be sensitised to be reflective of their levels of aggression. University management should help students to be reflective concerning their aggression, and to establish congruency between self-perception and reality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Students should be helped to understand and manage their aggressive inclination.</p>","PeriodicalId":35715,"journal":{"name":"Curationis","volume":"43 1","pages":"e1-e9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/curationis.v43i1.2142","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curationis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v43i1.2142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Students are sometimes subjected to difficult circumstances to achieve success. Studying under these circumstances could cultivate aggression towards self and others, and the environment. Little, if any, published research is available dealing with students being orientated autonomous versus being submissive and perceptions of aggression.

Objectives: To explore and describe the perceptions of groups of students being orientated autonomous versus students being submissive and perceptions of aggression. Recommendations concerning these two groups of students are made.

Method: An exploratory quantitative research design that is descriptive and inferential in nature was applied. A questionnaire was electronically distributed to students in a faculty. The questionnaire consisted of items on biographic, personality and aggression. In the statistical analysis Cronbach's alphas, principal component analysis were done and hypotheses were tested on differences between students orientated autonomous and those being submissive.

Results: Of the 266 completed questionnaires used, 177 were received from females and 89 from males. Eighty-two (82) of these were honours, masters or doctoral students. Findings reflected graded differences between students being autonomous and students being submissive orientated concerning Overt verbal aggression (means below 1.82), Overt physical aggression (means below 2.53) and aggressive inclination towards others (means below 3.01). The implications are that students are to be sensitised to be reflective of their levels of aggression. University management should help students to be reflective concerning their aggression, and to establish congruency between self-perception and reality.

Conclusion: Students should be helped to understand and manage their aggressive inclination.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非一所城市大学学生的自主-顺从取向和攻击行为:心理健康影响。
背景:学生有时要经历困难的环境才能取得成功。在这种情况下学习可能会培养对自己、对他人、对环境的攻击性。很少,如果有的话,发表的研究是关于学生是自主的还是顺从的,以及对侵略的看法。目的:探讨和描述自主型学生群体与顺从型学生群体的感知和攻击型学生群体的感知。对这两类学生提出了建议。方法:采用描述性和推理性的探索性定量研究设计。一份调查问卷以电子方式分发给某学院的学生。问卷内容包括个人经历、性格特征和攻击性。在统计分析中,采用Cronbach’s alpha法和主成分分析法,对自主型学生和服从型学生的差异进行假设检验。结果:共收到266份问卷,其中女性177份,男性89份。其中82人是硕士生或博士生。研究结果反映了自主型学生和顺从型学生在显性言语攻击(均值低于1.82)、显性肢体攻击(均值低于2.53)和对他人的攻击倾向(均值低于3.01)方面的等级差异。这意味着学生们要敏感地反映出他们的攻击性水平。大学管理应帮助学生反思自己的攻击性,并在自我认知与现实之间建立一致性。结论:应帮助学生了解和管理自己的攻击倾向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Curationis
Curationis Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Identity work of public hospital nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in South Africa Midwifery hurdles: Navigating tuberculosis screening challenges in South Africa Newly qualified professional nurses' experiences providing postoperative care to children in CTICU. Nurses' practices in stroke-related dysphagia in low- and middle-income countries. Guidelines to support newly qualified professional nurses for effective clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1