Efficacy of Topical Nepafenac 0.3% in the Management of Postoperative Cystoid Macular Edema.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management Pub Date : 2020-11-06 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S271184
Athanassios K Giarmoukakis, Styliani V Blazaki, Georgios C Bontzos, Argyro D Plaka, Konstantinos N Seliniotakis, Larissa D Ioannidi, Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris
{"title":"Efficacy of Topical Nepafenac 0.3% in the Management of Postoperative Cystoid Macular Edema.","authors":"Athanassios K Giarmoukakis,&nbsp;Styliani V Blazaki,&nbsp;Georgios C Bontzos,&nbsp;Argyro D Plaka,&nbsp;Konstantinos N Seliniotakis,&nbsp;Larissa D Ioannidi,&nbsp;Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S271184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the effect of twice-daily nepafenac ophthalmic suspension 0.3% on postoperative cystoid-macular-edema (CME).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this prospective, clinic-based, non-randomized case-series, 21 patients (21 eyes) were enrolled with either acute or chronic postoperative CME after cataract extraction. Patients were treated with twice-daily nepafenac 0.3% drops, and followed for at least a 4-month period. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)-derived central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 21 patients, eight presented with acute postoperative CME and 13 with chronic CME. Mean follow-up was 4.82±1.24 months. No adverse events were reported during the study. Baseline BCVA was 0.49±0.36 logMAR and improved to 0.36±0.42 logMAR at the last follow-up visit (<i>P</i><0.005). CRT decreased from 450.40±90.74 μm at baseline to 354.60±81.49 μm (<i>P</i><0.05), following treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our outcomes strongly suggest that administrating nepafenac 0.3% drops on a twice-daily regimen could be a promising alternative for the management of postoperative CME. Additional studies are necessary to further validate our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":48769,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","volume":"16 ","pages":"1067-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/TCRM.S271184","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S271184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effect of twice-daily nepafenac ophthalmic suspension 0.3% on postoperative cystoid-macular-edema (CME).

Patients and methods: In this prospective, clinic-based, non-randomized case-series, 21 patients (21 eyes) were enrolled with either acute or chronic postoperative CME after cataract extraction. Patients were treated with twice-daily nepafenac 0.3% drops, and followed for at least a 4-month period. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT)-derived central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured.

Results: From 21 patients, eight presented with acute postoperative CME and 13 with chronic CME. Mean follow-up was 4.82±1.24 months. No adverse events were reported during the study. Baseline BCVA was 0.49±0.36 logMAR and improved to 0.36±0.42 logMAR at the last follow-up visit (P<0.005). CRT decreased from 450.40±90.74 μm at baseline to 354.60±81.49 μm (P<0.05), following treatment.

Conclusion: Our outcomes strongly suggest that administrating nepafenac 0.3% drops on a twice-daily regimen could be a promising alternative for the management of postoperative CME. Additional studies are necessary to further validate our results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
0.3%外用尼非那酸治疗术后黄斑囊样水肿的疗效观察。
目的:观察每日2次0.3%尼泊芬酸眼悬液对术后黄斑囊样水肿(CME)的影响。患者和方法:在这项前瞻性、临床为基础、非随机的病例系列研究中,21例患者(21只眼)在白内障摘出术后出现急性或慢性CME。患者接受每日两次0.3%尼帕芬酸滴剂治疗,随访至少4个月。测量最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)衍生的视网膜中央厚度(CRT)。结果:21例患者中,8例出现术后急性CME, 13例出现慢性CME。平均随访时间为4.82±1.24个月。研究期间无不良事件报告。基线BCVA为0.49±0.36 logMAR,在最后一次随访时提高到0.36±0.42 logMAR。结论:我们的结果强烈表明,每天两次给予0.3%尼帕芬酸滴剂可能是治疗术后CME的有希望的替代方案。需要进一步的研究来进一步验证我们的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
139
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management is an international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and risk management, focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies in all therapeutic areas, outcomes, safety, and programs for the effective, safe, and sustained use of medicines, therapeutic and surgical interventions in all clinical areas. The journal welcomes submissions covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary. The journal will consider case reports but only if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. As of 18th March 2019, Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
期刊最新文献
Emerging Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis: Focus on Anemia. Factors Affecting Radial Artery Occlusion After Right Transradial Artery Catheterization for Coronary Intervention and Procedures. Innovations in the Treatment of Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa (DEB): Current Landscape and Prospects. Effect of Tricalcium Phosphate on Healing of Non-Unions: An Observational Study of over 400 Non-Unions. Discontinuation of Antidepressants in Older Adults: A Literature Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1