Endoscopic Closure of a Large Rectovesical Fistula Following Robotic Prostatectomy.

Q4 Medicine Journal of Endourology Case Reports Pub Date : 2020-09-17 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1089/cren.2019.0132
Andrew Watts, Neil J Kocher, Eric Pauli, Jay D Raman
{"title":"Endoscopic Closure of a Large Rectovesical Fistula Following Robotic Prostatectomy.","authors":"Andrew Watts,&nbsp;Neil J Kocher,&nbsp;Eric Pauli,&nbsp;Jay D Raman","doi":"10.1089/cren.2019.0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Rectovesical fistulae (RVF) are uncommon complications of pelvic surgeries and are a potential cause of significant morbidity. RVF are not typically closed endoscopically but rather require reoperative surgery of the lower pelvis with closure of tract, interposition of fat or omentum, and possible permanent bowel diversion. We present a unique case of a rectovesical fistula developing after robotic prostatectomy that was managed by multimodal multistage endoscopic therapy as an alternative to conventional operative repair. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A healthy 78-year-old Caucasian man underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by an unrecognized rectal injury culminating in emergent exploration, abdominal washout, creation of a diverting loop transverse colostomy, and resultant development of a large rectovesical fistula. Given the patient's hostile abdomen and desire for conservative management the fistula was managed through a combined cystoscopic and endoscopic procedure that utilized suturing and clipping to close the fistula. This novel technique was followed by a series of three subsequent endoscopic procedures that enabled us to gradually downsize the fistula over time and ultimately achieve complete closure. The patient's colostomy was eventually reversed with return of bowel continuity. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Although uncommon, RVF are significant complications of pelvic surgery. The presence of abdominal/pelvic adhesions from previous surgeries or patient comorbidities can make open surgical repair extremely challenging or impracticable. Therefore, it is important to recognize and consider the use of endoscopic techniques as potential options for closure of rectovesical fistula in certain situations.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 3","pages":"139-142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/cren.2019.0132","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2019.0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Rectovesical fistulae (RVF) are uncommon complications of pelvic surgeries and are a potential cause of significant morbidity. RVF are not typically closed endoscopically but rather require reoperative surgery of the lower pelvis with closure of tract, interposition of fat or omentum, and possible permanent bowel diversion. We present a unique case of a rectovesical fistula developing after robotic prostatectomy that was managed by multimodal multistage endoscopic therapy as an alternative to conventional operative repair. Case Presentation: A healthy 78-year-old Caucasian man underwent a robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection for high-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate. The patient's postoperative course was complicated by an unrecognized rectal injury culminating in emergent exploration, abdominal washout, creation of a diverting loop transverse colostomy, and resultant development of a large rectovesical fistula. Given the patient's hostile abdomen and desire for conservative management the fistula was managed through a combined cystoscopic and endoscopic procedure that utilized suturing and clipping to close the fistula. This novel technique was followed by a series of three subsequent endoscopic procedures that enabled us to gradually downsize the fistula over time and ultimately achieve complete closure. The patient's colostomy was eventually reversed with return of bowel continuity. Conclusion: Although uncommon, RVF are significant complications of pelvic surgery. The presence of abdominal/pelvic adhesions from previous surgeries or patient comorbidities can make open surgical repair extremely challenging or impracticable. Therefore, it is important to recognize and consider the use of endoscopic techniques as potential options for closure of rectovesical fistula in certain situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人前列腺切除术后大直肠膀胱瘘的内镜闭合。
背景:直肠膀胱瘘(RVF)是骨盆手术的罕见并发症,是一个潜在的重要原因。裂谷热通常不经内窥镜封闭,而是需要对骨盆下部进行再手术,同时关闭尿路,插入脂肪或网膜,并可能进行永久性肠分流。我们提出了一个独特的病例直肠膀胱瘘发展后,机器人前列腺切除术,是由多模式多阶段的内镜治疗,以替代传统的手术修复。病例介绍:一名健康的78岁白人男性接受了机器人辅助的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术,并切除了双侧盆腔淋巴结,以治疗高危前列腺癌。患者的术后过程因未被识别的直肠损伤而复杂化,最终导致紧急探查,腹部冲洗,建立转移环横向结肠造口,并最终形成大的直肠膀胱瘘。考虑到患者的敌对腹部和保守治疗的愿望,我们通过膀胱镜和内窥镜联合手术,利用缝合和夹紧来关闭瘘管。在这项新技术之后,我们进行了一系列的三次内窥镜手术,使我们能够随着时间的推移逐渐缩小瘘管并最终实现完全闭合。患者的结肠造口术最终因肠连续性恢复而逆转。结论:裂谷热虽不常见,但却是骨盆手术的重要并发症。以往手术造成的腹腔/盆腔粘连或患者合并症的存在使得开放式手术修复极具挑战性或不切实际。因此,在某些情况下,认识和考虑使用内窥镜技术作为关闭直肠膀胱瘘的潜在选择是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Complication of Amplatz Sheath: Amplatz Sheath Rupture During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Patient's Fear of Being Infected, Another Complication of COVID-19 Outbreak: A Lesson Learned from a Case of Life-Threatening Urolithiasis. Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Renal Pelvis. Endoscopic Management of Chyluria Caused by Pyelolymphatic Fistula After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Ureteroiliac Fistula: Bleeding of Unknown Origin-Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1