Chevrel technique for ventral incisional hernia. Is it still an effective procedure?

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08463-1
Giovanni Alemanno, Alessandro Bruscino, Jacopo Martellucci, Carlo Bergamini, Gherardo Maltinti, Annamaria Di Bella, Veronica Iacopini, Alessio Giordano, Andrea Valeri, Paolo Prosperi
{"title":"Chevrel technique for ventral incisional hernia. Is it still an effective procedure?","authors":"Giovanni Alemanno,&nbsp;Alessandro Bruscino,&nbsp;Jacopo Martellucci,&nbsp;Carlo Bergamini,&nbsp;Gherardo Maltinti,&nbsp;Annamaria Di Bella,&nbsp;Veronica Iacopini,&nbsp;Alessio Giordano,&nbsp;Andrea Valeri,&nbsp;Paolo Prosperi","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08463-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incisional hernia still represents the most frequent late complication of abdominal surgery. After a direct repair, in literature is reported a recurrence rate ranging from 31 to 49%, meanwhile after a prosthetic repair such values were much lower, with a recurrence rate up to 10%. The sites of prosthetic placement in the abdominal wall are premusculo-aponeurotic (onlay, or Chevrel technique), retromuscular-prefascial and preperitoneal (Rives technique, Stoppa technique), whereas intraperitoneal insertion can be done with open or laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and late postoperative results in patients treated with a Chevrel technique for ventral incisional hernia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair between January 2008 and December 2018 at the Emergency Surgery Unit of the Careggi University Hospital in Florence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between January 2008 and December 2018 at the Emergency Surgery Unit of the Careggi University Hospital in Florence, 461 patients (245 male, 216 female) with a mean age of 61,52 years were submitted to ventral incisional hernia repair with a Chevrel technique. The mean operatory time was 95.29 min (±50.48) and in 72 patients (15.61%) human fibrin glue was vaporized under the mesh using a spray device. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 5 days and all drain tubes were removed after 7.1 days as mean (±4.3). No intraoperative mortality nor postoperative mortality was reported. In our experience the Chevrel technique for ventral incisional hernia show a recurrence rate (3.2%). Parietal complications observed were seroma in 7.1% of patients, hematoma in 4.7%, localized skin necrosis in 5.2%, surgical site infection in 6.7%, data comparable with the results reported in the other studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most of the objections to the Chevrel procedure focus on the parietal complications and risk of infection. Chevrel procedure cannot be considered an obsolete intervention, in our series, results were very satisfactory in both immediate and late follow-up; moreover this technique is safe and easy to perform.</p>","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08463-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Incisional hernia still represents the most frequent late complication of abdominal surgery. After a direct repair, in literature is reported a recurrence rate ranging from 31 to 49%, meanwhile after a prosthetic repair such values were much lower, with a recurrence rate up to 10%. The sites of prosthetic placement in the abdominal wall are premusculo-aponeurotic (onlay, or Chevrel technique), retromuscular-prefascial and preperitoneal (Rives technique, Stoppa technique), whereas intraperitoneal insertion can be done with open or laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate and late postoperative results in patients treated with a Chevrel technique for ventral incisional hernia.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records of patients undergoing ventral hernia repair between January 2008 and December 2018 at the Emergency Surgery Unit of the Careggi University Hospital in Florence.

Results: Between January 2008 and December 2018 at the Emergency Surgery Unit of the Careggi University Hospital in Florence, 461 patients (245 male, 216 female) with a mean age of 61,52 years were submitted to ventral incisional hernia repair with a Chevrel technique. The mean operatory time was 95.29 min (±50.48) and in 72 patients (15.61%) human fibrin glue was vaporized under the mesh using a spray device. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 5 days and all drain tubes were removed after 7.1 days as mean (±4.3). No intraoperative mortality nor postoperative mortality was reported. In our experience the Chevrel technique for ventral incisional hernia show a recurrence rate (3.2%). Parietal complications observed were seroma in 7.1% of patients, hematoma in 4.7%, localized skin necrosis in 5.2%, surgical site infection in 6.7%, data comparable with the results reported in the other studies.

Conclusions: Most of the objections to the Chevrel procedure focus on the parietal complications and risk of infection. Chevrel procedure cannot be considered an obsolete intervention, in our series, results were very satisfactory in both immediate and late follow-up; moreover this technique is safe and easy to perform.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
切夫雷尔技术治疗腹侧切口疝。这仍然是一个有效的程序吗?
背景:切口疝仍然是腹部手术最常见的晚期并发症。文献报道,直接修复后的复发率为31% ~ 49%,而义肢修复后的复发率要低得多,复发率可达10%。假体在腹壁的位置是肌前-腱膜(onlay,或Chevrel技术),肌后-筋膜前和腹膜前(Rives技术,Stoppa技术),而腹腔内插入可以通过开放或腹腔镜手术完成。本研究的目的是评估使用Chevrel技术治疗腹侧切口疝的患者的即时和后期术后结果。方法:回顾性分析2008年1月至2018年12月在佛罗伦萨Careggi大学医院急诊外科接受腹疝修补术患者的医疗记录。结果:2008年1月至2018年12月,在佛罗伦萨Careggi大学医院急诊外科,461例患者(245例男性,216例女性)采用Chevrel技术进行腹侧切口疝修复,平均年龄为61,52岁。平均手术时间为95.29 min(±50.48),72例(15.61%)患者使用喷雾装置将人纤维蛋白胶在网片下蒸发。术后平均住院时间为5天,平均7.1天(±4.3)天拔除所有引流管。无术中死亡率和术后死亡率报告。根据我们的经验,Chevrel技术治疗腹侧切口疝的复发率为3.2%。观察到的壁并发症为血清肿(7.1%)、血肿(4.7%)、局部皮肤坏死(5.2%)、手术部位感染(6.7%),数据与其他研究报道的结果相当。结论:对Chevrel手术的大多数反对意见集中在顶叶并发症和感染风险上。切夫雷尔手术不能被认为是一种过时的干预措施,在我们的研究中,无论是直接随访还是后期随访,结果都非常令人满意;此外,该技术安全,易于操作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid. Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with end-stage alcohol-related liver disease and severe acute alcohol-related hepatitis: a concise review. Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results. Management of intra- and post-operative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1