The use of analgesics in pediatric patients with body injuries in pre-hospital conditions.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Minerva pediatrica Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2020-10-27 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06094-6
Piotr K Leszczyński, Daryna Sholokhova, Arkadiusz Wejnarski
{"title":"The use of analgesics in pediatric patients with body injuries in pre-hospital conditions.","authors":"Piotr K Leszczyński, Daryna Sholokhova, Arkadiusz Wejnarski","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06094-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the positive dynamic changes in medicine and science, injuries continue to be the dominant cause of death among people under 45 years of age. Children's injuries are particularly dangerous as they can lead to hypovolemic shock, disability or even death. EMS uses opioid and non-opioid analgesics in order to provide relief to patients suffering from pain. The aim of this work is to analyze the types of pharmacological substances used in children in pre-hospital conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research tools included medical documentation of the emergency medical services in Poland. The analysis included 68,441 medical emergency treatment forms from 2016-2017, from which 464 interventions for children after trauma were selected. The general patient profile, characteristics of the event site, type of injuries suffered, type of intervening EMS, pharmacotherapy being used, as well as vital signs (GCS, RTS, HR, NiBP) were subject to assessment. The χ<sup>2</sup> independence tests were performed, considering the results as statistically significant for P<0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 354 instances of BEMS (Basic Emergency Medical Services - without a doctor) and 110 instances of SEMS (Specialist Emergency Medical Services - with a doctor) sent to the emergency site. The mean age was 10.8±4.84 years. Boys were subject to intervention more often than girls (N.=283 vs. N.=181). Analgesics were administered in case of 49 (10.56%) patients only. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the analgesics of choice, which were used in 25 patients (50%), while opioid analgesics were used in 10 patients (20.40%). Analgesia was mostly used in patients with lower limb (34.69%) and upper limb (30.61%) injuries. The lowest percentage of analgesic use was observed in patients with head and neck injuries (3.06%). There was a significant relationship demonstrated between the type of EMS and the use of analgesics (χ<sup>2</sup>=6.330; P=0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analgesia with EMS in children with injuries is critically insufficient. NSAIDs are the most commonly administered drugs in pre-hospital conditions. Head and torso injuries reduce the percentage of drugs administered by EMS. The EMS teams with no doctors (BEMS) are significantly more likely to use anesthetics, compared to SEMS.</p>","PeriodicalId":18533,"journal":{"name":"Minerva pediatrica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06094-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the positive dynamic changes in medicine and science, injuries continue to be the dominant cause of death among people under 45 years of age. Children's injuries are particularly dangerous as they can lead to hypovolemic shock, disability or even death. EMS uses opioid and non-opioid analgesics in order to provide relief to patients suffering from pain. The aim of this work is to analyze the types of pharmacological substances used in children in pre-hospital conditions.

Methods: The research tools included medical documentation of the emergency medical services in Poland. The analysis included 68,441 medical emergency treatment forms from 2016-2017, from which 464 interventions for children after trauma were selected. The general patient profile, characteristics of the event site, type of injuries suffered, type of intervening EMS, pharmacotherapy being used, as well as vital signs (GCS, RTS, HR, NiBP) were subject to assessment. The χ2 independence tests were performed, considering the results as statistically significant for P<0.05.

Results: There were 354 instances of BEMS (Basic Emergency Medical Services - without a doctor) and 110 instances of SEMS (Specialist Emergency Medical Services - with a doctor) sent to the emergency site. The mean age was 10.8±4.84 years. Boys were subject to intervention more often than girls (N.=283 vs. N.=181). Analgesics were administered in case of 49 (10.56%) patients only. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were the analgesics of choice, which were used in 25 patients (50%), while opioid analgesics were used in 10 patients (20.40%). Analgesia was mostly used in patients with lower limb (34.69%) and upper limb (30.61%) injuries. The lowest percentage of analgesic use was observed in patients with head and neck injuries (3.06%). There was a significant relationship demonstrated between the type of EMS and the use of analgesics (χ2=6.330; P=0.012).

Conclusions: Analgesia with EMS in children with injuries is critically insufficient. NSAIDs are the most commonly administered drugs in pre-hospital conditions. Head and torso injuries reduce the percentage of drugs administered by EMS. The EMS teams with no doctors (BEMS) are significantly more likely to use anesthetics, compared to SEMS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在院前条件下对身体受伤的儿科病人使用镇痛剂。
背景:尽管医学和科学发生了积极的动态变化,但伤害仍是 45 岁以下人群死亡的主要原因。儿童受伤尤其危险,因为它们可能导致低血容量性休克、残疾甚至死亡。急救服务使用阿片类和非阿片类镇痛药来缓解患者的疼痛。这项工作旨在分析儿童在院前情况下使用的药理物质类型:研究工具包括波兰紧急医疗服务的医疗文件。分析对象包括2016-2017年的68441份医疗急救治疗表格,从中选取了464项针对儿童创伤后的干预措施。对患者的一般情况、事件发生地点的特征、受伤类型、干预急救服务的类型、使用的药物疗法以及生命体征(GCS、RTS、HR、NiBP)进行了评估。进行了χ2独立性检验,认为结果的pResults具有统计学意义:共有 354 例 BEMS(基本紧急医疗服务--无医生)和 110 例 SEMS(专业紧急医疗服务--有医生)被送往急救现场。平均年龄为 10.8 (SD ± 4.84)岁。男孩接受干预的次数多于女孩(分别为 283 次和 181 次)。只有 49 例(10.56%)患者使用了止痛药。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)是首选镇痛药,25 名患者(50%)使用了这种药物,10 名患者(20.40%)使用了阿片类镇痛药。镇痛药主要用于下肢(34.69%)和上肢(30.61%)受伤的患者。头颈部受伤的患者使用镇痛药的比例最低(3.06%)。急救服务的类型与镇痛剂的使用之间存在明显关系(χ2=6.330;P=0.012):结论:受伤儿童使用急救医疗服务时的镇痛严重不足。非甾体抗炎药是院前条件下最常用的药物。头部和躯干受伤降低了急救服务的用药比例。与 SEMS 相比,没有医生的 EMS 团队(BEMS)使用麻醉剂的可能性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva pediatrica
Minerva pediatrica PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Pediatrica publishes scientific papers on pediatrics, neonatology, adolescent medicine, child and adolescent psychiatry and pediatric surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of pediatric nurses' perception of factors affecting negotiation of care in a Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Unit. The use of analgesics in pediatric patients with body injuries in pre-hospital conditions. Respiratory polygraphy in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective study. Evaluation of factors affecting total nucleated cells in umbilical cord blood collected for the Calabria Cord Blood Bank. Risk factors associated with wheezing in severe pediatric community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1