An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Apical Leakage Using Different Root Canal Sealers.

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Medical Science Monitor Basic Research Pub Date : 2020-11-25 DOI:10.12659/MSMBR.928175
Violeta Vula, Nexhmije Ajeti, Astrit Kuçi, Miranda Stavileci, Vegim Vula
{"title":"An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation of Apical Leakage Using Different Root Canal Sealers.","authors":"Violeta Vula,&nbsp;Nexhmije Ajeti,&nbsp;Astrit Kuçi,&nbsp;Miranda Stavileci,&nbsp;Vegim Vula","doi":"10.12659/MSMBR.928175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND Successful endodontic therapy requires a fluid-tight apical seal. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of 3 root canal sealers: Apexit Plus, AH Plus, and Resilon/Epiphany sealers. MATERIAL AND METHODS Samples of 152 single-rooted teeth were divided into 2 test groups, and each group was divided into 3 subgroups based on the preparation and obturation technique. After preparation with the step-back technique, the first group of root canals were obturated with lateral gutta-percha compaction in combination with AH Plus sealer or Apexit Plus or with the Resilon/Epiphany system alone. In the second group, preparation was done with the crown-down technique and root canals were then obturated with Thermafil obturator in combination with AH Plus or Apexit Plus or with Resilon/Epiphany sealer alone. Apical leakage was determined using a dye leakage test observed with a stereomicroscope. The degree of dye leakage was assessed using the t test to comparing the arithmetic averages of the groups. RESULTS In the groups prepared with the step-back technique, the average dye leakage was lower in samples obturated with Resilon/Epiphany, than in those filled with AH Plus/lateral gutta-percha compaction or Apexit Plus/lateral gutta-percha compaction. In groups prepared with the crown-down technique and obturated with the Resilon/Epiphany system, the average dye leakage was lower than in those filled with AH Plus/Thermafil obturation and those filled with Apexit Plus/Thermafil obturation. CONCLUSIONS Although all preparation and obturation techniques showed dye penetration, the crown-down technique paired with the Resilon/Epiphany system showed the least leakage.</p>","PeriodicalId":18491,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Monitor Basic Research","volume":"26 ","pages":"e928175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8e/af/medscimonitbasicres-26-e928175.PMC7702640.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Monitor Basic Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12659/MSMBR.928175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

BACKGROUND Successful endodontic therapy requires a fluid-tight apical seal. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the apical sealing ability of 3 root canal sealers: Apexit Plus, AH Plus, and Resilon/Epiphany sealers. MATERIAL AND METHODS Samples of 152 single-rooted teeth were divided into 2 test groups, and each group was divided into 3 subgroups based on the preparation and obturation technique. After preparation with the step-back technique, the first group of root canals were obturated with lateral gutta-percha compaction in combination with AH Plus sealer or Apexit Plus or with the Resilon/Epiphany system alone. In the second group, preparation was done with the crown-down technique and root canals were then obturated with Thermafil obturator in combination with AH Plus or Apexit Plus or with Resilon/Epiphany sealer alone. Apical leakage was determined using a dye leakage test observed with a stereomicroscope. The degree of dye leakage was assessed using the t test to comparing the arithmetic averages of the groups. RESULTS In the groups prepared with the step-back technique, the average dye leakage was lower in samples obturated with Resilon/Epiphany, than in those filled with AH Plus/lateral gutta-percha compaction or Apexit Plus/lateral gutta-percha compaction. In groups prepared with the crown-down technique and obturated with the Resilon/Epiphany system, the average dye leakage was lower than in those filled with AH Plus/Thermafil obturation and those filled with Apexit Plus/Thermafil obturation. CONCLUSIONS Although all preparation and obturation techniques showed dye penetration, the crown-down technique paired with the Resilon/Epiphany system showed the least leakage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同根管封闭剂治疗根尖渗漏的体外比较研究。
背景:成功的根管治疗需要液体紧密的根尖密封。本体外研究的目的是评估和比较3种根管密封剂的根尖密封能力:Apexit Plus、AH Plus和Resilon/Epiphany密封剂。材料与方法将152颗单根牙标本分为2个试验组,每组根据制备方法和充填技术分为3个亚组。在采用步退技术进行准备后,第一组根管采用侧根胶压实术联合AH Plus密封剂或Apexit Plus或单独使用Resilon/ epiphon系统进行封闭。在第二组中,使用冠下技术进行准备,然后使用Thermafil闭孔器联合AH Plus或Apexit Plus或单独使用Resilon/Epiphany密封剂进行根管封闭。用立体显微镜观察染料渗漏试验确定根尖渗漏。采用t检验比较各组的算术平均值,评估染料泄漏程度。结果采用退步技术制备的样品中,使用Resilon/ epiphon封闭的样品的平均染料泄漏量低于使用AH Plus/侧边杜仲胶压实或Apexit Plus/侧边杜仲胶压实的样品。在冠下技术制备组和Resilon/ epiphon系统封闭组中,平均染料泄漏量低于AH Plus/Thermafil封闭组和Apexit Plus/Thermafil封闭组。结论虽然所有的制备和封闭技术都有染料渗透,但冠绒技术与Resilon/ epiphon系统配对时渗漏最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Science Monitor Basic Research
Medical Science Monitor Basic Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Adult Intussusception in Jordan: Demographics, Clinical Features, and Outcomes from a Tertiary Hospital. Correlation of Cytokine Profiles with Prostate-Specific Antigen and Disease Grade in Prostate Cancer. Effect of Lidocaine on Ciprofol Dosage and Efficacy in Patients Who Underwent Gastroscopy Sedation. Methods of Processing Dental Chromium-Cobalt Alloys for Production of Metal Frameworks Faced with Ceramics to Obtain the Best Mechanical Properties. A Comparison of Outcomes from Antibiotic Treatment with and without Probiotics in 897 Patients with Lower Urogenital Tract Infections, Including Cystitis, Urethritis, Prostatitis, and Vulvovaginitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1