Automatic oxygen titration with O2matic® to patients admitted with COVID-19 and hypoxemic respiratory failure.

IF 1.8 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Clinical Respiratory Journal Pub Date : 2020-10-14 DOI:10.1080/20018525.2020.1833695
Ejvind Frausing Hansen, Charlotte Sandau Bech, Jørgen Vestbo, Ove Andersen, Linette Marie Kofod
{"title":"Automatic oxygen titration with O2matic® to patients admitted with COVID-19 and hypoxemic respiratory failure.","authors":"Ejvind Frausing Hansen,&nbsp;Charlotte Sandau Bech,&nbsp;Jørgen Vestbo,&nbsp;Ove Andersen,&nbsp;Linette Marie Kofod","doi":"10.1080/20018525.2020.1833695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and pneumonitis often have hypoxemic respiratory failure and a need of supplementary oxygen. Guidelines recommend controlled oxygen, for most patients with a recommended interval of SpO<sub>2</sub> between 92 and 96%. We aimed to determine if closed-loop control of oxygen was feasible in patients with COVID-19 and could maintain SpO<sub>2</sub> in the specified interval.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were prospectively enrolled in an observational study on a medical ward dedicated to patients with COVID-19. Closed-loop controlled oxygen was delivered by O2matic® which can deliver 0-15 liters/min and adjusts flow every second based on 15 seconds averaging of SpO<sub>2</sub> measured by pulse oximetry. Lung function parameters were measured at admission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen patients (six women, nine men) participated in the study. Average age was 72 years. Lung function was severely impaired with FEV<sub>1</sub>, FVC and PEF reduced to approximately 50%. The average stay on the ward was 3.2 days and O2matic was used on average for 66 hours, providing 987 hours of observation. O2matic maintained SpO<sub>2</sub> in the desired interval for 82.9% of the time. Time with SpO<sub>2</sub> > 2% below interval was 5.1% and time with SpO<sub>2</sub> > 2% above interval was 0.6%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Closed-loop control of oxygen to patients with COVID-19 is feasible and can maintain SpO<sub>2</sub> in the specified interval in the majority of time. Closed-loop automated control could be of particular benefit for patients in isolation with decreased visibility, surveillance and monitoring. Further studies must examine the clinical benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":11872,"journal":{"name":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20018525.2020.1833695","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Clinical Respiratory Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20018525.2020.1833695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and pneumonitis often have hypoxemic respiratory failure and a need of supplementary oxygen. Guidelines recommend controlled oxygen, for most patients with a recommended interval of SpO2 between 92 and 96%. We aimed to determine if closed-loop control of oxygen was feasible in patients with COVID-19 and could maintain SpO2 in the specified interval.

Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled in an observational study on a medical ward dedicated to patients with COVID-19. Closed-loop controlled oxygen was delivered by O2matic® which can deliver 0-15 liters/min and adjusts flow every second based on 15 seconds averaging of SpO2 measured by pulse oximetry. Lung function parameters were measured at admission.

Results: Fifteen patients (six women, nine men) participated in the study. Average age was 72 years. Lung function was severely impaired with FEV1, FVC and PEF reduced to approximately 50%. The average stay on the ward was 3.2 days and O2matic was used on average for 66 hours, providing 987 hours of observation. O2matic maintained SpO2 in the desired interval for 82.9% of the time. Time with SpO2 > 2% below interval was 5.1% and time with SpO2 > 2% above interval was 0.6%.

Conclusion: Closed-loop control of oxygen to patients with COVID-19 is feasible and can maintain SpO2 in the specified interval in the majority of time. Closed-loop automated control could be of particular benefit for patients in isolation with decreased visibility, surveillance and monitoring. Further studies must examine the clinical benefits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
O2matic®自动氧滴定治疗新冠肺炎合并低氧性呼吸衰竭患者
简介:冠状病毒病(COVID-19)和肺炎患者经常出现低氧性呼吸衰竭,需要补充氧气。指南建议控制氧气,对于大多数患者,建议SpO2间隔在92 - 96%之间。我们的目的是确定在COVID-19患者中闭环控制氧是否可行,并能维持SpO2在规定的时间间隔内。方法:前瞻性地将患者纳入一项针对COVID-19患者的医学病房的观察性研究。闭环控制氧气由O2matic®提供,可提供0-15升/分钟,并根据脉搏血氧仪测量的15秒SpO2平均值每秒调节流量。入院时测量肺功能参数。结果:15例患者(6名女性,9名男性)参与了研究。平均年龄为72岁。肺功能严重受损,FEV1、FVC和PEF降低至约50%。平均住院时间3.2天,平均使用O2matic 66小时,观察时间987小时。O2matic在82.9%的时间内将SpO2维持在所需的时间间隔内。SpO2 < 2%的时间为5.1%,高于SpO2 > 2%的时间为0.6%。结论:对COVID-19患者进行闭环控氧是可行的,在大多数时间内可将SpO2维持在规定的时间间隔内。闭环自动控制对于能见度、监测和监测下降的隔离患者可能特别有益。进一步的研究必须检验临床效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Factors behind favorable long-term lung cancer survival in Norway compared to Denmark: a retrospective cohort study. Socioeconomic status and emergency department visits in adults with a history of severe childhood asthma: a register-based study. Comorbid allergy and rhinitis and patient-related outcomes in asthma and COPD: a cross-sectional study. Lung function measurements in the Greenlandic Inuit population: results from the Greenlandic health survey 2017-2019. Asthma severity: the patient's point of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1