Remdesivir for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Community Hospital's Experience.

Stephen Lee, Anthony Santarelli, Kristen Caine, Sarah Schritter, Tyson Dietrich, John Ashurst
{"title":"Remdesivir for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Community Hospital's Experience.","authors":"Stephen Lee,&nbsp;Anthony Santarelli,&nbsp;Kristen Caine,&nbsp;Sarah Schritter,&nbsp;Tyson Dietrich,&nbsp;John Ashurst","doi":"10.7556/jaoa.2020.156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Following the emergence of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), researchers sought safe and effective treatment modalities. Remdesivir is currently being evaluated for clinical efficacy and safety in patients with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients following treatment with remdesivir at a community hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of medical records was conducted in August 2020 for all patients given remdesivir while hospitalized for severe COVID-19 between May 1 and August 19, 2020. A convenience sample of consecutive patients with treatment including remdesivir, antibiotics, convalescent plasma, dexamethasone, or a combination of multiple drugs was included in the analysis. Patients receiving remdesivir were administered a 5-day treatment course. Patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min, those with liver function tests 5 times the normal reference range, and those who were pregnant were excluded from treatment with remdesivir. Differences in between men and women were detected with χ2 and independent samples t tests. The degree to which presenting symptoms influenced patient outcomes was analyzed with a stepwise logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 76 patients who received remdesivir, the mean (95% confidence interval, CI) age was 63 years (59.8-66.2). Thirty-six (47.4%) were men and 40 (52.6%) were women. Forty-nine (64.5%) were White and 27 (35.5%) were nonWhite. The majority of patients (54; 71.1%) had at least 1 comorbid condition, with hypertension being the most common (43; 56.6%). The mean (95% CI) length of stay for patients who received remdesivir was 10.09 days (8.6-11.6) and the mean (95% CI) duration of oxygen therapy was 9.42 days (8.0-10.8). A total of 14 (18.4%) patients given remdesivir were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with an mean (95% CI) length of stay of 9.29 days (5.6-13.0). Women administered remdesivir were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (11 [27.5%] vs 3 [8.3%]; P=.031). The mortality rate was 14 patients (18.4%), with no statistically significant difference observed between men (5; 13.9%) and women (9; 22.5%; P=.33). No significant difference was seen amongst sexes for duration of oxygen therapy (men, 8.0 days [6.2-9.8] vs women, 10.76 days [8.8-12.8]; P=.051) or length of stay (men, 8.61 days [6.7-10.5] vs women, 11.43 days [9.3-13.5]; P=.058). There was no statistically significant difference in pooled racial groups (White vs nonWhite) for in-hospital mortality, number admitted to the ICU, days spent in the ICU, duration of oxygen use, or length of stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remdesivir may show clinical efficacy for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in a community setting. Although this was a small-scale study with limited patients, it represents a point of reference for the use of remdesivir at other community hospitals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47816,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION","volume":" ","pages":"926-933"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.7556/jaoa.2020.156","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2020.156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Context: Following the emergence of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), researchers sought safe and effective treatment modalities. Remdesivir is currently being evaluated for clinical efficacy and safety in patients with COVID-19.

Objective: To describe the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 patients following treatment with remdesivir at a community hospital.

Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted in August 2020 for all patients given remdesivir while hospitalized for severe COVID-19 between May 1 and August 19, 2020. A convenience sample of consecutive patients with treatment including remdesivir, antibiotics, convalescent plasma, dexamethasone, or a combination of multiple drugs was included in the analysis. Patients receiving remdesivir were administered a 5-day treatment course. Patients with a glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min, those with liver function tests 5 times the normal reference range, and those who were pregnant were excluded from treatment with remdesivir. Differences in between men and women were detected with χ2 and independent samples t tests. The degree to which presenting symptoms influenced patient outcomes was analyzed with a stepwise logistic regression.

Results: Among the 76 patients who received remdesivir, the mean (95% confidence interval, CI) age was 63 years (59.8-66.2). Thirty-six (47.4%) were men and 40 (52.6%) were women. Forty-nine (64.5%) were White and 27 (35.5%) were nonWhite. The majority of patients (54; 71.1%) had at least 1 comorbid condition, with hypertension being the most common (43; 56.6%). The mean (95% CI) length of stay for patients who received remdesivir was 10.09 days (8.6-11.6) and the mean (95% CI) duration of oxygen therapy was 9.42 days (8.0-10.8). A total of 14 (18.4%) patients given remdesivir were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with an mean (95% CI) length of stay of 9.29 days (5.6-13.0). Women administered remdesivir were more likely to be admitted to the ICU (11 [27.5%] vs 3 [8.3%]; P=.031). The mortality rate was 14 patients (18.4%), with no statistically significant difference observed between men (5; 13.9%) and women (9; 22.5%; P=.33). No significant difference was seen amongst sexes for duration of oxygen therapy (men, 8.0 days [6.2-9.8] vs women, 10.76 days [8.8-12.8]; P=.051) or length of stay (men, 8.61 days [6.7-10.5] vs women, 11.43 days [9.3-13.5]; P=.058). There was no statistically significant difference in pooled racial groups (White vs nonWhite) for in-hospital mortality, number admitted to the ICU, days spent in the ICU, duration of oxygen use, or length of stay.

Conclusion: Remdesivir may show clinical efficacy for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in a community setting. Although this was a small-scale study with limited patients, it represents a point of reference for the use of remdesivir at other community hospitals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞德西韦治疗重症COVID-19的经验
背景:导致2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)出现后,研究人员寻求安全有效的治疗方法。目前正在评估Remdesivir对COVID-19患者的临床疗效和安全性。目的:了解社区医院新冠肺炎患者接受瑞德西韦治疗后的临床结果。方法:对2020年5月1日至8月19日期间因重症COVID-19住院期间接受瑞德西韦治疗的所有患者在2020年8月的病历进行回顾性分析。分析中纳入了连续接受瑞德西韦、抗生素、恢复期血浆、地塞米松或多种药物联合治疗的患者的方便样本。接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者接受为期5天的疗程。肾小球滤过率小于30 mL/min、肝功能检查是正常参考范围5倍的患者以及孕妇排除在瑞德西韦治疗之外。采用χ2和独立样本t检验检测男女之间的差异。用逐步逻辑回归分析症状对患者预后的影响程度。结果:76例接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者中,平均(95%置信区间,CI)年龄为63岁(59.8-66.2岁)。其中男性36例(47.4%),女性40例(52.6%)。49例(64.5%)为白人,27例(35.5%)为非白人。大多数患者(54例;71.1%)至少有1种合并症,其中高血压最为常见(43;56.6%)。接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者平均(95% CI)住院时间为10.09天(8.6-11.6),氧疗的平均(95% CI)持续时间为9.42天(8.0-10.8)。接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者共14例(18.4%)入住重症监护病房(ICU),平均(95% CI)住院时间为9.29天(5.6-13.0)。服用瑞德西韦的女性更有可能入住ICU(11人[27.5%]对3人[8.3%]);P = .031)。死亡率为14例(18.4%),男性间无统计学差异(5例;13.9%),女性(9%;22.5%;P = .33)。氧疗持续时间在性别间无显著差异(男性为8.0天[6.2-9.8],女性为10.76天[8.8-12.8];P= 0.051)或停留时间(男性,8.61天[6.7-10.5]vs女性,11.43天[9.3-13.5];P = .058)。在合并的种族组(白人与非白人)中,住院死亡率、入住ICU的人数、在ICU的天数、氧气使用时间或住院时间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:在社区环境中,瑞德西韦治疗重症COVID-19可能具有临床疗效。虽然这是一项小规模研究,患者数量有限,但它为其他社区医院使用瑞德西韦提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OSTEOPATHIC ASSOCIATION MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAOA—The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association is the official scientific publication of the American Osteopathic Association, as well as the premier scholarly, peer-reviewed publication of the osteopathic medical profession. The JAOA"s mission is to advance medicine through the scholarly publication of peer-reviewed osteopathic medical research. The JAOA"s goals are: 1. To be the authoritative scholarly publication of the osteopathic medical profession 2. To advance the traditional tenets of osteopathic medicine while encouraging the development of emerging concepts relevant to the profession"s distinctiveness
期刊最新文献
A Longitudinal Cohort Study of Youth Mental Health and Substance use Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Ontario, Canada: An Exploratory Analysis. Communication Skills of Grandview/Southview Medical Center General Surgery Residents. Osteopathic Manual Treatment for Pain Severity, Functional Improvement, and Return to Work in Patients With Chronic Pain. Septic Pulmonary Emboli With Feeding Vessel Sign. Sister Mary Joseph Nodule.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1