Timing of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Postoperative Pain Management.

IF 1.5 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY Local and Regional Anesthesia Pub Date : 2020-11-03 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/LRA.S278372
Maria Escudero-Fung, Erik B Lehman, Kunal Karamchandani
{"title":"Timing of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Postoperative Pain Management.","authors":"Maria Escudero-Fung,&nbsp;Erik B Lehman,&nbsp;Kunal Karamchandani","doi":"10.2147/LRA.S278372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks using liposomal bupivacaine can reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after surgery. The impact of timing of administration of such blocks has not been determined.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of all adult patients that underwent colorectal procedures between January 2013 and October 2015 and received TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine at our institution was conducted. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative use of non-opioid analgesics as well as total hospital cost of admission and postoperative hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 287 patients were identified and included in the analysis. A total of 71 patients received blocks prior to induction of general anesthesia (pre-ind), 85 patients received blocks after induction of general anesthesia but prior to surgical incision (post-ind) and 131 patients received blocks after completion of surgery (post-op). No significant differences were observed in the postoperative pain scores (either in the first 4 hours or for the entire duration of hospital stay) or opioid consumption between the pre-ind and the post-ind groups. More ketorolac was used in the post-op group compared to the pre-ind group (or= 3.36, 95% CI (1.08, 10.43); p=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that there seems to be no difference if tap blocks with liposomal bupivacaine are performed before or after induction of anesthesia. Patient preference as well as operating room efficiency should be considered when deciding on the timing of these blocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":18203,"journal":{"name":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/LRA.S278372","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Local and Regional Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/LRA.S278372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Background: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks using liposomal bupivacaine can reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after surgery. The impact of timing of administration of such blocks has not been determined.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study of all adult patients that underwent colorectal procedures between January 2013 and October 2015 and received TAP blocks with liposomal bupivacaine at our institution was conducted. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes included postoperative use of non-opioid analgesics as well as total hospital cost of admission and postoperative hospital length of stay.

Results: A total of 287 patients were identified and included in the analysis. A total of 71 patients received blocks prior to induction of general anesthesia (pre-ind), 85 patients received blocks after induction of general anesthesia but prior to surgical incision (post-ind) and 131 patients received blocks after completion of surgery (post-op). No significant differences were observed in the postoperative pain scores (either in the first 4 hours or for the entire duration of hospital stay) or opioid consumption between the pre-ind and the post-ind groups. More ketorolac was used in the post-op group compared to the pre-ind group (or= 3.36, 95% CI (1.08, 10.43); p=0.03).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that there seems to be no difference if tap blocks with liposomal bupivacaine are performed before or after induction of anesthesia. Patient preference as well as operating room efficiency should be considered when deciding on the timing of these blocks.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹横面阻滞时机与术后疼痛处理。
背景:使用布比卡因脂质体阻滞经腹平面(TAP)可以减少术后疼痛和阿片类药物的消耗。这类药物服用时间的影响尚未确定。材料与方法:对2013年1月至2015年10月在我院接受布比卡因脂质体TAP阻滞治疗的所有结直肠手术成年患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要结局是术后疼痛评分和阿片类药物消耗。次要结局包括术后非阿片类镇痛药的使用、住院总费用和术后住院时间。结果:共有287例患者被纳入分析。共有71例患者在全麻诱导前(pre-ind)接受阻滞,85例患者在全麻诱导后但在手术切口前(后ind)接受阻滞,131例患者在手术完成后(后op)接受阻滞。在术后疼痛评分(前4小时或整个住院期间)或阿片类药物消耗方面,ind前组和ind后组没有观察到显著差异。与术前相比,术后组使用更多的酮咯酸(or= 3.36, 95% CI (1.08, 10.43);p = 0.03)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在麻醉诱导之前或之后使用布比卡因脂质体进行tap阻断似乎没有差异。在决定这些阻滞的时机时,应考虑患者的偏好以及手术室的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Foot Drop Following a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block with Ropivacaine, A Case Report and Literature Review. Comparison of Spinal Morphine and Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Opioid Requirements After Caesarean Section: An Observational Study. Current Status and Global Trend of Rebound Pain After Regional Anesthesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Regarding Use of Local Anaesthetics Among Non-Anaesthesia Healthcare Professionals at Mulago National Referral Hospital. Combined Supra-Inguinal Fascia Iliaca, Sciatic Nerve, and Posterior Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Blocks in Austere Settings for Hemodynamically Unstable Patients with Vascular Injuries from Weapon Wounds: A Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1