Patient Experience Monitor (PEM): The Development of New Short-Form Picker Experience Questionnaires for Hospital Patients with a Wide Range of Literacy Levels.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2020-11-30 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PROM.S274015
Carla M Bastemeijer, Hileen Boosman, Linda Zandbelt, Reinier Timman, Dolf de Boer, Jan A Hazelzet
{"title":"Patient Experience Monitor (PEM): The Development of New Short-Form Picker Experience Questionnaires for Hospital Patients with a Wide Range of Literacy Levels.","authors":"Carla M Bastemeijer, Hileen Boosman, Linda Zandbelt, Reinier Timman, Dolf de Boer, Jan A Hazelzet","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S274015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Several patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) were developed through the years. These questionnaires are frequently found to be inappropriate for people with lower literacy levels. This paper describes the development of patient experience questionnaires for hospital patients with a wide range of literacy levels, while enabling the potential for quality improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods were used to adapt Picker Institute patient experience questionnaires: selection of items and adaptation towards language level B1 (the language level of which patients can express their own opinion and describe experiences, events and expectations) by expert panels, usability tests with patients, analysis of psychometric properties and member checking. A theory-driven approach was followed for definitive enrolment of items, meaning that the items eligible for exclusion had been carefully reviewed by the expert team and representatives of a patient council before definitive exclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A pilot study was performed in an University Medical Centre in the Netherlands among in- and outpatients after discharge. Two provisional questionnaires of 22 items, designed by an expert panel, were reduced towards a final selection of 14-15 items. This led to two short-form questionnaires, called Patient Experience Monitor (PEM) Adult Inpatient and PEM Adult Outpatient. To illustrate, the results of the PEM Adult Outpatient questionnaire are presented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PEMs are short and valid questionnaires specifically developed to measure patient experiences of hospital patients with a wide range of literacy levels. Acceptance of the questionnaires for both lower and higher educated patients are confirmed by usability tests. The respondents of the pilot study represent both groups. The developed questionnaires should be seen as a dynamic entity and part of a continuous effort to evaluate and improve patient experiences. Future studies are needed to examine the usability of these new questionnaires for quality improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":"11 ","pages":"221-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/22/62/prom-11-221.PMC7725101.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S274015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Purpose: Several patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) were developed through the years. These questionnaires are frequently found to be inappropriate for people with lower literacy levels. This paper describes the development of patient experience questionnaires for hospital patients with a wide range of literacy levels, while enabling the potential for quality improvement.

Methods: Mixed methods were used to adapt Picker Institute patient experience questionnaires: selection of items and adaptation towards language level B1 (the language level of which patients can express their own opinion and describe experiences, events and expectations) by expert panels, usability tests with patients, analysis of psychometric properties and member checking. A theory-driven approach was followed for definitive enrolment of items, meaning that the items eligible for exclusion had been carefully reviewed by the expert team and representatives of a patient council before definitive exclusion.

Results: A pilot study was performed in an University Medical Centre in the Netherlands among in- and outpatients after discharge. Two provisional questionnaires of 22 items, designed by an expert panel, were reduced towards a final selection of 14-15 items. This led to two short-form questionnaires, called Patient Experience Monitor (PEM) Adult Inpatient and PEM Adult Outpatient. To illustrate, the results of the PEM Adult Outpatient questionnaire are presented.

Conclusion: PEMs are short and valid questionnaires specifically developed to measure patient experiences of hospital patients with a wide range of literacy levels. Acceptance of the questionnaires for both lower and higher educated patients are confirmed by usability tests. The respondents of the pilot study represent both groups. The developed questionnaires should be seen as a dynamic entity and part of a continuous effort to evaluate and improve patient experiences. Future studies are needed to examine the usability of these new questionnaires for quality improvement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
病人体验监测(PEM):开发新的短形式的选择经验问卷的医院病人与广泛的文化水平。
目的:多年来开发了几种患者报告经验措施(PREMs)。这些问卷经常被发现不适合文化水平较低的人。本文描述了患者体验问卷的发展与广泛的识字水平的医院患者,同时使质量的潜在改进。方法:采用混合方法对Picker Institute患者体验问卷进行调整:专家小组选择项目并调整语言水平B1(患者可以表达自己的观点并描述经历、事件和期望的语言水平),与患者进行可用性测试,分析心理测量特性并进行成员检查。采用理论驱动的方法对项目进行最终登记,这意味着在最终排除之前,有资格排除的项目已由专家组和患者委员会的代表仔细审查。结果:在荷兰的一所大学医学中心进行了一项试点研究,其中包括出院后的住院和门诊患者。由一个专家小组设计的两份包含22个项目的临时问卷减少到最终选择的14-15个项目。这导致了两个简短的问卷调查,称为患者体验监测(PEM)成人住院患者和PEM成人门诊患者。为了说明,PEM成人门诊问卷的结果被提出。结论:PEMs是一种短而有效的问卷,专门用于测量各种文化水平的住院患者的患者体验。通过可用性测试确认了低学历和高学历患者对问卷的接受程度。试点研究的受访者代表了这两个群体。开发的问卷应被视为一个动态的实体和持续努力的一部分,以评估和改善患者的经验。未来的研究需要检查这些新问卷的可用性,以提高质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of the Content Validity of the COVID-19 Symptoms Daily Diary. Is It Time Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency Had a Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure? A Review. Utilities Associated with the Treatment of Growth Hormone Deficiency (GHD): A Time Trade-off (TTO) Study in the UK and Canada. "Time to Be Young?" - A Qualitative Study Exploring the Impact of Attending a Course for Young Carers Who Have a Parent with Dementia. The Role of Medical Helicopter and Ground Medical Crews in Polytrauma Management: An Evaluative Perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1