Maintenance motives for physical activity among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Health Psychology Review Pub Date : 2021-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-12-11 DOI:10.1080/17437199.2020.1858926
Mary Katherine Huffman, Jason Brian Reed, Theresa Kathleen Carpenter, Steve Amireault
{"title":"Maintenance motives for physical activity among older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mary Katherine Huffman,&nbsp;Jason Brian Reed,&nbsp;Theresa Kathleen Carpenter,&nbsp;Steve Amireault","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2020.1858926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this systematic review was to examine if the motives of satisfaction with outcomes, enjoyment of behavior, self-determination, and identity are related to physical activity (PA) maintenance in older adults. We also explored whether the strength of these associations varies as a function of sample characteristics (i.e., age, gender, physical health status) and maintenance context. Five electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, SportDiscus, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses) were searched, and sixteen studies (<i>k</i>) with a sample mean age ≥ 55 years were included. When the number of studies was ≥ 5 for a given motive, a pooled correlation coefficient was calculated using the inverse-variance method under the random-effects model assumption. Self-determination was positively associated with PA maintenance [<i>r</i> (95% CI) = 0.189 (0.127, 0.249); <i>k</i> = 11]. This association was stronger and more homogeneous for samples described as having a physical health condition (<i>r</i> = 0.212; <i>k</i> = 6) and studies judged to be at risk of bias due to missing data (<i>r</i> = 0.223; <i>k</i> = 8). Few studies (< 5) investigated satisfaction with outcomes, enjoyment of behavior, and identity, which precludes any summary judgment for these three motives. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018088161.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17437199.2020.1858926","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1858926","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/12/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to examine if the motives of satisfaction with outcomes, enjoyment of behavior, self-determination, and identity are related to physical activity (PA) maintenance in older adults. We also explored whether the strength of these associations varies as a function of sample characteristics (i.e., age, gender, physical health status) and maintenance context. Five electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, SportDiscus, CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses) were searched, and sixteen studies (k) with a sample mean age ≥ 55 years were included. When the number of studies was ≥ 5 for a given motive, a pooled correlation coefficient was calculated using the inverse-variance method under the random-effects model assumption. Self-determination was positively associated with PA maintenance [r (95% CI) = 0.189 (0.127, 0.249); k = 11]. This association was stronger and more homogeneous for samples described as having a physical health condition (r = 0.212; k = 6) and studies judged to be at risk of bias due to missing data (r = 0.223; k = 8). Few studies (< 5) investigated satisfaction with outcomes, enjoyment of behavior, and identity, which precludes any summary judgment for these three motives. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42018088161.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年人保持体力活动的动机:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本系统回顾的目的是检查老年人对结果满意、行为享受、自我决定和身份认同的动机是否与身体活动(PA)维持有关。我们还探讨了这些关联的强度是否随样本特征(即年龄、性别、身体健康状况)和维持环境的变化而变化。检索5个电子数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO、SportDiscus、CINAHL和ProQuest dissertation and Theses),纳入16项研究(k),样本平均年龄≥55岁。当给定动机的研究数≥5时,在随机效应模型假设下,采用反方差法计算合并相关系数。自我决定与PA维持呈正相关[r (95% CI) = 0.189 (0.127, 0.249);k = 11]。对于被描述为身体健康状况的样本,这种关联更强,更均匀(r = 0.212;K = 6),由于缺少数据,判定研究存在偏倚风险(r = 0.223;k = 8)。很少有研究(< 5)调查了对结果、行为享受和身份的满意度,这排除了对这三种动机的任何简易判断。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42018088161。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
期刊最新文献
Good mental health in people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. The iterative development and refinement of health psychology theories through formal, dynamical systems modelling: a scoping review and initial expert-derived 'best practice' recommendations. The concept of treatment beliefs in children and adolescents with chronic health conditions: a scoping review. Barriers and enablers to maintaining self-management behaviours after attending a self-management support intervention for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis. Acceptance and commitment therapy processes and their association with distress in cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1