Usefulness, limitations, and parental opinion about teleconsultation for rare pediatric epilepsies

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Epilepsy & Behavior Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107656
Blandine Dozières-Puyravel , Stéphane Auvin
{"title":"Usefulness, limitations, and parental opinion about teleconsultation for rare pediatric epilepsies","authors":"Blandine Dozières-Puyravel ,&nbsp;Stéphane Auvin","doi":"10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>Evaluation of the usefulness and the parental opinion about teleconsultation (TC) for rare pediatric epilepsies.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>One-month prospective survey of consecutive TCs. All clinics on site have been turned into TC in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. The physicians quoted all TCs while the parents expressed their opinion though an invitation for an online questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 151 TCs (145 patients) among the 259 epilepsy TCs done during the study period. The parental questionnaire has been answered 105 times. The physicians felt confident to organize a TC for the next visit of 74.8% of the children, but some limits were identified such as the absence of physical examination, weight, and psychomotor development evaluation.</p><p>The physicians felt more confident for a new TC in older patients (9.5 ± 5.5 years versus 5.3 ± 4.3 years) and in stable patients (73.8% confident for instable, 82.8% for stable). Parents were satisfied with TC feeling that it answered health issues in a better manner than a clinic pinpointing the gain of time and the absence of travel. However, half of them would prefer a clinic for the next appointment.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Teleconsultation seems useful answering the patients’ needs according to both physicians and families. Despite some limitations, it is most likely that TCs become a new part of the clinical activities in rare pediatric epilepsy centers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11847,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy & Behavior","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 107656"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107656","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525505020308362","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Aim

Evaluation of the usefulness and the parental opinion about teleconsultation (TC) for rare pediatric epilepsies.

Method

One-month prospective survey of consecutive TCs. All clinics on site have been turned into TC in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. The physicians quoted all TCs while the parents expressed their opinion though an invitation for an online questionnaire.

Results

We included 151 TCs (145 patients) among the 259 epilepsy TCs done during the study period. The parental questionnaire has been answered 105 times. The physicians felt confident to organize a TC for the next visit of 74.8% of the children, but some limits were identified such as the absence of physical examination, weight, and psychomotor development evaluation.

The physicians felt more confident for a new TC in older patients (9.5 ± 5.5 years versus 5.3 ± 4.3 years) and in stable patients (73.8% confident for instable, 82.8% for stable). Parents were satisfied with TC feeling that it answered health issues in a better manner than a clinic pinpointing the gain of time and the absence of travel. However, half of them would prefer a clinic for the next appointment.

Interpretation

Teleconsultation seems useful answering the patients’ needs according to both physicians and families. Despite some limitations, it is most likely that TCs become a new part of the clinical activities in rare pediatric epilepsy centers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罕见儿童癫痫远程会诊的有效性、局限性和家长意见
目的评价小儿罕见癫痫远程会诊的有效性及家长意见。方法对连续tc患者进行为期一个月的前瞻性调查。在COVID-19大流行的背景下,现场所有诊所都变成了TC。医生们引用了所有的tc,而家长们则通过在线问卷的方式表达了他们的意见。结果在研究期间进行的259例癫痫tc中,我们纳入了151例tc(145例患者)。家长问卷共回答105次。医生有信心为74.8%的儿童下次就诊组织TC,但发现了一些限制,如缺乏体格检查、体重和精神运动发展评估。医生对老年患者(9.5 ± 5.5 年对5.3 ± 4.3 年)和稳定患者(73.8%对不稳定患者有信心,82.8%对稳定患者有信心)的新TC更有信心。家长们对TC感到满意,认为它比诊所指出时间的增加和旅行的减少更好地解决了健康问题。然而,他们中的一半人希望下次预约时去诊所。远程会诊似乎对医生和家属回答病人的需求都很有用。尽管存在一些局限性,但TCs很可能成为罕见小儿癫痫中心临床活动的新组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy & Behavior
Epilepsy & Behavior 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
385
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy & Behavior is the fastest-growing international journal uniquely devoted to the rapid dissemination of the most current information available on the behavioral aspects of seizures and epilepsy. Epilepsy & Behavior presents original peer-reviewed articles based on laboratory and clinical research. Topics are drawn from a variety of fields, including clinical neurology, neurosurgery, neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, and neuroimaging. From September 2012 Epilepsy & Behavior stopped accepting Case Reports for publication in the journal. From this date authors who submit to Epilepsy & Behavior will be offered a transfer or asked to resubmit their Case Reports to its new sister journal, Epilepsy & Behavior Case Reports.
期刊最新文献
Comparing the cognitive-motor performance of individuals with temporal lobe epilepsy versus healthy controls using robotics. Identification of cognitive phenotypes in temporal lobe epilepsy and genetic generalized epilepsy using robotic assessment. Right vagal nerve stimulation for epilepsy - case series and systematic review of the literature. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience of self-disgust in people with functional/dissociative seizures. In good paws: A qualitative investigation into patients' and caregivers' experiences with seizure dogs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1