Gender differences in brain type according to the Empathy/Systemising Quotient for Children (EQ/SQ-C) questionnaire in Indonesia.

IF 0.3 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.2989/17280583.2020.1848850
Kamila Ratu Chaidir, Eloisa Nathania, Kindah Mahdiyyah, Yudi Rheza Phallavi, Tjhin Wiguna
{"title":"Gender differences in brain type according to the Empathy/Systemising Quotient for Children (EQ/SQ-C) questionnaire in Indonesia.","authors":"Kamila Ratu Chaidir,&nbsp;Eloisa Nathania,&nbsp;Kindah Mahdiyyah,&nbsp;Yudi Rheza Phallavi,&nbsp;Tjhin Wiguna","doi":"10.2989/17280583.2020.1848850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective:</i> This research was conducted to support the hypothesis that boys and girls have different brain types that affect their empathy and systemising quotients. <i>Method:</i> This was a cross-sectional study using an online survey. The Indonesian version of the Empathy/Systemising Quotient for Children (EQ/SQ-C) questionnaire was used to identify the brain type and empathy and systemising quotients. Participants were 620 parents who had primary school children and having minimal junior high school background. The data analysis used chi-square test and Mann-Whitney <i>U</i>-test on SPSS program for Mac version 20. Results: Boys and girls had different brain types (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The extreme-empathising brain type consisted of 1.9% girls and 0.5% boys; the empathising brain type was 15.8% in girls and 9.0% in boys. Further, 0.8% of girls and 2.6% of boys had the extreme-systemising brain type. Although the empathy quotient average mean score of the boys was significantly lower than the girls (<i>p</i> < 0.05), the systemising quotient average mean score was slightly higher than that of the girls. <i>Conclusion:</i> This study found that gender plays an important role in empathy and systemising skills. Therefore, creating a stimulating program that supports empathy and systemising quotients in primary school students should be developed according to gender.</p>","PeriodicalId":45290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health","volume":"32 2-3","pages":"111-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2989/17280583.2020.1848850","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child and Adolescent Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2989/17280583.2020.1848850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objective: This research was conducted to support the hypothesis that boys and girls have different brain types that affect their empathy and systemising quotients. Method: This was a cross-sectional study using an online survey. The Indonesian version of the Empathy/Systemising Quotient for Children (EQ/SQ-C) questionnaire was used to identify the brain type and empathy and systemising quotients. Participants were 620 parents who had primary school children and having minimal junior high school background. The data analysis used chi-square test and Mann-Whitney U-test on SPSS program for Mac version 20. Results: Boys and girls had different brain types (p < 0.05). The extreme-empathising brain type consisted of 1.9% girls and 0.5% boys; the empathising brain type was 15.8% in girls and 9.0% in boys. Further, 0.8% of girls and 2.6% of boys had the extreme-systemising brain type. Although the empathy quotient average mean score of the boys was significantly lower than the girls (p < 0.05), the systemising quotient average mean score was slightly higher than that of the girls. Conclusion: This study found that gender plays an important role in empathy and systemising skills. Therefore, creating a stimulating program that supports empathy and systemising quotients in primary school students should be developed according to gender.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据印度尼西亚儿童共情/系统商(EQ/SQ-C)问卷调查,大脑类型的性别差异。
目的:这项研究是为了支持男孩和女孩的大脑类型不同的假设,影响他们的同理心和系统商。方法:采用在线调查的横断面研究。印度尼西亚版的儿童共情/系统商(EQ/SQ-C)问卷用于确定大脑类型和共情和系统商。参与者是620名有小学孩子的父母,他们的初中学历最低。数据分析采用卡方检验和Mann-Whitney u检验,SPSS软件为Mac version 20。结果:男孩和女孩脑型差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。极端移情型大脑由1.9%的女孩和0.5%的男孩组成;共情脑类型在女孩中占15.8%,在男孩中占9.0%。此外,0.8%的女孩和2.6%的男孩拥有极端系统化的大脑类型。男生共情商平均得分显著低于女生(p < 0.05),而系统化商平均得分略高于女生。结论:这项研究发现,性别在移情和系统化技能中起着重要作用。因此,创建一个刺激的程序,支持同情和系统商的小学生应该根据性别发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Journal of Child & Adolescent Mental Health publishes papers that contribute to improving the mental health of children and adolescents, especially those in Africa. Papers from all disciplines are welcome. It covers subjects such as epidemiology, mental health prevention and promotion, psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy, policy and risk behaviour. The journal contains review articles, original research (including brief reports), clinical papers in a "Clinical perspectives" section and book reviews. The Journal is published in association with the South African Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Allied Professions (SAACAPAP).
期刊最新文献
Response to "Developing and Validating a Scale to Measure Trauma-Informed Practices Used by Teachers in Inclusive Schools in Ghana and the United Arab Emirates". Exam anxiety in connection with life orientation in upper secondary education students. Protective and risk factors for social and emotional well-being of Indigenous children and adolescents: A rapid review. Psychosocial predictors of adolescent depression and mental health referral in an urban mobile medical unit programme. The experiences of oppression among transgender and gender expansive young people in Australia: An interpretative phenomenological study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1