SpaceOAR Hydrogel Present 32 Weeks After Instillation Prevents Neobladder Creation in Patient Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystoprostatectomy.

Q4 Medicine Journal of Endourology Case Reports Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1089/cren.2020.0088
Alejandra Balen, David Sobel, Sammy Elsamra, Dragan Golijanin
{"title":"SpaceOAR Hydrogel Present 32 Weeks After Instillation Prevents Neobladder Creation in Patient Undergoing Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystoprostatectomy.","authors":"Alejandra Balen,&nbsp;David Sobel,&nbsp;Sammy Elsamra,&nbsp;Dragan Golijanin","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The injection of hydrogel in between the anterior rectal wall and prostate protects the rectum from the radiation field in men undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Multicenter prospective trials have demonstrated safety of the material, and that liquefication and reabsorption of the material occur roughly 12 weeks after injection. Other studies have noted the presence of the hydrogel up to 24 weeks after injection and documented significant complications with its use. In this study we discuss a patient in whom hydrogel was discovered in the anterior rectal wall who was undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy 32 weeks after injection, and how this precluded creation of a neobladder. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> A 64-year-old Caucasian man with a history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension was diagnosed with unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. He underwent injection of hydrogel followed by radiotherapy. He subsequently developed hematuria and carcinoma <i>in situ</i> and high grade T1 nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer were diagnosed. Thirty-two weeks later, he underwent robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy. The patient was originally planned for neobladder creation but intraoperative findings of persistent hydrogel in between rectum and prostate precluded this reconstruction and necessitated construction of an ileal conduit. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Urologists should be aware of the fact that SpaceOAR hydrogel can persist beyond the expected 12- to 24-week dissolution period. In a patient who requires a radical cystectomy, the persistent presence of that gel may preclude the creation of a neobladder. Preoperative imaging to identify persistence <i>vs</i> dissolution of the gel would facilitate better preoperative patient counseling.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"442-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803245/pdf/cren.2020.0088.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: The injection of hydrogel in between the anterior rectal wall and prostate protects the rectum from the radiation field in men undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Multicenter prospective trials have demonstrated safety of the material, and that liquefication and reabsorption of the material occur roughly 12 weeks after injection. Other studies have noted the presence of the hydrogel up to 24 weeks after injection and documented significant complications with its use. In this study we discuss a patient in whom hydrogel was discovered in the anterior rectal wall who was undergoing radical cystoprostatectomy 32 weeks after injection, and how this precluded creation of a neobladder. Case Presentation: A 64-year-old Caucasian man with a history of diabetes mellitus and hypertension was diagnosed with unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. He underwent injection of hydrogel followed by radiotherapy. He subsequently developed hematuria and carcinoma in situ and high grade T1 nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer were diagnosed. Thirty-two weeks later, he underwent robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy. The patient was originally planned for neobladder creation but intraoperative findings of persistent hydrogel in between rectum and prostate precluded this reconstruction and necessitated construction of an ileal conduit. Conclusion: Urologists should be aware of the fact that SpaceOAR hydrogel can persist beyond the expected 12- to 24-week dissolution period. In a patient who requires a radical cystectomy, the persistent presence of that gel may preclude the creation of a neobladder. Preoperative imaging to identify persistence vs dissolution of the gel would facilitate better preoperative patient counseling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性膀胱前列腺切除术患者中,注射32周后的SpaceOAR水凝胶可防止新膀胱的产生。
背景:在前列腺癌放疗患者直肠前壁与前列腺之间注射水凝胶可保护直肠免受辐射场的影响。多中心前瞻性试验已经证明了该材料的安全性,并且该材料在注射后大约12周发生液化和再吸收。其他研究注意到水凝胶在注射后24周仍存在,并记录了使用水凝胶的显著并发症。在这项研究中,我们讨论了一位在注射32周后接受根治性膀胱前列腺切除术的患者在直肠前壁发现水凝胶,以及这如何阻止了新膀胱的产生。病例介绍:一名有糖尿病和高血压病史的64岁白人男性被诊断为不利的中危前列腺癌。他接受了水凝胶注射和放疗。他随后出现血尿和原位癌,并被诊断为T1级非肌性浸润性膀胱癌。32周后,他接受了机器人辅助的根治性膀胱前列腺切除术。患者最初计划进行新膀胱的重建,但术中发现直肠和前列腺之间存在持久的水凝胶,因此无法进行重建,因此需要建造回肠导管。结论:泌尿科医生应该意识到,SpaceOAR水凝胶可以持续超过预期的12- 24周的溶解期。在需要根治性膀胱切除术的患者中,这种凝胶的持续存在可能会阻止新膀胱的形成。术前成像识别凝胶的持久性和溶解性将有助于更好的术前患者咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Complication of Amplatz Sheath: Amplatz Sheath Rupture During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Patient's Fear of Being Infected, Another Complication of COVID-19 Outbreak: A Lesson Learned from a Case of Life-Threatening Urolithiasis. Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Renal Pelvis. Endoscopic Management of Chyluria Caused by Pyelolymphatic Fistula After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Ureteroiliac Fistula: Bleeding of Unknown Origin-Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1