{"title":"Pentoxifylline in Prevention of Amphotericin B-induced Nephrotoxicity and Electrolyte Abnormalities.","authors":"Mahsa Panahi-Shokouh, Azadeh Moghaddas, Shirinsadat Badri, Saeedeh Jabalameli, Mahnaz Momenzadeh, Valiollah Mehrzad, Farzaneh Ashrafi","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Amphotericin B is an antifungal agent used to treat serious fungal infections mainly in critically ill patients. Despite its adverse effects including renal toxicity and electrolyte imbalances, amphotericin B remains one of the best choices for antifungal treatment. Information from animal studies has provided a strong scientific basis for the use of pentoxifylline as lowering nephroprotective agent. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline in preventing renal toxicity and electrolytes imbalances induced by amphotericin B.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial on 44 patients admitted to Sayyedoshohada Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from October 2016 to August 2018. Patients were assigned to one of the two groups: Pentoxifylline, 400 mg twice a day, or matching placebo, from the 1<sup>st</sup> day of amphotericin B therapy till minimum of 7 days. All patients' information including lab data (serum and urine levels of Mg, Na, and K, serum creatinine level, blood urea nitrogen [BUN] and urinary creatinine excretion) were gathered at the time of drug initiation and during the study period. The results were analyzed by SPSS v. 20 software and Repeated measures test was used to assess the differences between groups.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This study did not show any significant differences between the two groups in terms of all the assessed variables, including serum and urinary levels of electrolytes, and creatinine, as well as the number of cases presented acute kidney injury during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the positive effects of pentoxifylline in preventing renal complications in previous studies, this study could not show a definitive result in salt wasting or renal damage induced by amphotericin B. So, Designing robust studies with more included samples would be valuable.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"9 3","pages":"135-139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/76/cc/JRPP-9-135.PMC7808184.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Amphotericin B is an antifungal agent used to treat serious fungal infections mainly in critically ill patients. Despite its adverse effects including renal toxicity and electrolyte imbalances, amphotericin B remains one of the best choices for antifungal treatment. Information from animal studies has provided a strong scientific basis for the use of pentoxifylline as lowering nephroprotective agent. The present study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of pentoxifylline in preventing renal toxicity and electrolytes imbalances induced by amphotericin B.
Methods: This study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial on 44 patients admitted to Sayyedoshohada Hospital, Isfahan, Iran, from October 2016 to August 2018. Patients were assigned to one of the two groups: Pentoxifylline, 400 mg twice a day, or matching placebo, from the 1st day of amphotericin B therapy till minimum of 7 days. All patients' information including lab data (serum and urine levels of Mg, Na, and K, serum creatinine level, blood urea nitrogen [BUN] and urinary creatinine excretion) were gathered at the time of drug initiation and during the study period. The results were analyzed by SPSS v. 20 software and Repeated measures test was used to assess the differences between groups.
Findings: This study did not show any significant differences between the two groups in terms of all the assessed variables, including serum and urinary levels of electrolytes, and creatinine, as well as the number of cases presented acute kidney injury during the study period.
Conclusion: Despite the positive effects of pentoxifylline in preventing renal complications in previous studies, this study could not show a definitive result in salt wasting or renal damage induced by amphotericin B. So, Designing robust studies with more included samples would be valuable.
目的:两性霉素B是一种主要用于治疗重症真菌感染的抗真菌药物。尽管其副作用包括肾毒性和电解质失衡,两性霉素B仍然是抗真菌治疗的最佳选择之一。来自动物研究的信息为己酮茶碱作为降肾保护剂的使用提供了强有力的科学依据。本研究旨在评价pentoxifylline对两性霉素b所致肾毒性和电解质失衡的预防作用。方法:本研究采用随机对照试验,选取2016年10月至2018年8月在伊朗伊斯法罕Sayyedoshohada医院住院的44例患者。从两性霉素B治疗的第一天开始,患者被分配到两组中的一组:己酮茶碱,400毫克,每天两次,或匹配的安慰剂,直到至少7天。收集所有患者在用药时和研究期间的实验室数据(血清和尿Mg、Na、K水平,血清肌酐水平,血尿素氮[BUN]和尿肌酐排泄量)。采用SPSS v. 20软件对结果进行分析,采用重复测量检验评价组间差异。研究结果:在所有评估变量方面,包括血清和尿液电解质水平、肌酐水平,以及研究期间出现急性肾损伤的病例数,本研究未显示两组之间有任何显著差异。结论:尽管己酮茶碱在既往研究中有预防肾脏并发症的积极作用,但本研究不能明确显示两性霉素b引起的盐消耗或肾脏损害,因此设计更多纳入样本的可靠研究是有价值的。
期刊介绍:
The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.