Objective: The use of rapamycin (sirolimus) in the treatment of infantile hemangioma (IH) is a persistent challenge in dermatology. We aim to systematically review the efficacy and safety of rapamycin for IH treatment.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for relevant English papers up to December 2024. After screening the full texts, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Detailed data about the effectiveness and safety of rapamycin in IH were collected.
Findings: A total of 8 articles published between 2013 and 2021 were included, with 8 cases. The ages of the participants ranged from 3 weeks to 10 years. The most common dose of rapamycin used in these papers was 0.8 mg/m2 twice daily, with a range of 0.1 mg/m2 to 2 mg/m2 daily. Most patients had a response to rapamycin therapy (five out of eight patients). Two cases reported gastrointestinal adverse effects, whereas one developed severe, fatal hypoglycemia after angiography, which the authors considered the role that rapamycin in causing this complication to be unlikely.
Conclusion: Rapamycin can be a safe and efficient medication in the treatment of IH. Combination therapy, especially in patients resistant to treatment for IH, is a preferred choice for IH treatment and reduces the side effects of propranolol. It is also preferred for the treatment of lesions in the mucosal areas and near important organs.
目的:应用雷帕霉素(西罗莫司)治疗婴幼儿血管瘤(IH)是皮肤科的一个长期挑战。我们的目的是系统地回顾雷帕霉素治疗IH的有效性和安全性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Web of Science和Scopus,检索截止到2024年12月的相关英文论文。在全文筛选后,有8项研究符合纳入标准。采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的检查表对纳入文章的质量进行评估。收集了雷帕霉素治疗IH的有效性和安全性的详细数据。结果:共纳入2013 - 2021年间发表的8篇文章,其中8例。参与者的年龄从3周至10岁不等。这些论文中使用的最常见的雷帕霉素剂量为0.8毫克/平方米,每日两次,范围为0.1毫克/平方米至2毫克/平方米。大多数患者对雷帕霉素治疗有反应(8名患者中有5名)。两例报告了胃肠道不良反应,而一例在血管造影后出现了严重的、致命的低血糖,作者认为雷帕霉素在引起这种并发症中的作用不太可能。结论:雷帕霉素是一种安全有效的治疗IH的药物。联合治疗,特别是对IH治疗有耐药性的患者,是IH治疗的首选,并可减少心得安的副作用。它也优先用于治疗粘膜区域和重要器官附近的病变。
{"title":"A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus (Rapamycin) in the Management of Infantile Hemangioma.","authors":"Bahareh Abtahi-Naeini, Fateme Ahmadinia, Fatemeh Ghorbali, Elaheh Foroughi","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_58_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_58_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The use of rapamycin (sirolimus) in the treatment of infantile hemangioma (IH) is a persistent challenge in dermatology. We aim to systematically review the efficacy and safety of rapamycin for IH treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus for relevant English papers up to December 2024. After screening the full texts, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. The quality of the included articles was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Detailed data about the effectiveness and safety of rapamycin in IH were collected.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 8 articles published between 2013 and 2021 were included, with 8 cases. The ages of the participants ranged from 3 weeks to 10 years. The most common dose of rapamycin used in these papers was 0.8 mg/m2 twice daily, with a range of 0.1 mg/m2 to 2 mg/m2 daily. Most patients had a response to rapamycin therapy (five out of eight patients). Two cases reported gastrointestinal adverse effects, whereas one developed severe, fatal hypoglycemia after angiography, which the authors considered the role that rapamycin in causing this complication to be unlikely.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rapamycin can be a safe and efficient medication in the treatment of IH. Combination therapy, especially in patients resistant to treatment for IH, is a preferred choice for IH treatment and reduces the side effects of propranolol. It is also preferred for the treatment of lesions in the mucosal areas and near important organs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 4","pages":"127-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12684998/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714786","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dispensing errors in outpatient and community pharmacies pose significant safety risks and contribute to increased global healthcare costs. Despite their frequency, comprehensive studies on rates, causes, and interventions remain limited. This review examines current evidence on dispensing error prevalence, key risk factors, and the impact of mitigation strategies. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL for studies on dispensing error rates in community and outpatient pharmacies, covering the period from January 2010 to June 2025, including English-language studies and grey literature. Eligible studies reported calculable prevalence using cross-sectional, cohort, or longitudinal designs. Two reviewers independently assessed records, extracted data, and evaluated bias using the NHLBI and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tools. In 22 studies (13 from developing, 9 from developed countries), dispensing error rates ranged from 0.001% to 11.53%, higher in community (mean 4.12%) than in outpatient pharmacies (1.85%). Common errors were wrong dose/ strength (58.6%) and look-/sound-alike drugs (47.90%). Key contributors were workload (55%), staff shortages (22%), and illegible prescriptions (30.70%). While one study reported a modest 1.40% decrease with electronic prescribing, another observed up to a 98.20% reduction using automated systems. GRADE evaluation found very low confidence in the data due to variability in study settings and methods. Dispensing errors remain a major issue, particularly in community pharmacies and underserved areas. Multimodal strategies - integrating technology, standardizing workflows, and training staff - represent a potentially effective approach to reducing errors. Although the certainty of the evidence is very low, the findings may still help guide future policies aimed at introducing error reporting systems, adopting technology, and improving consistency in research methods.
{"title":"Community Pharmacy Dispensing Errors: A Comprehensive Systematic Review on Trends and Solutions.","authors":"Azadeh Eshraghi, Niloofar Madani, Hamidreza Aslani, Maryam Farasatinasab","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_40_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_40_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dispensing errors in outpatient and community pharmacies pose significant safety risks and contribute to increased global healthcare costs. Despite their frequency, comprehensive studies on rates, causes, and interventions remain limited. This review examines current evidence on dispensing error prevalence, key risk factors, and the impact of mitigation strategies. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL for studies on dispensing error rates in community and outpatient pharmacies, covering the period from January 2010 to June 2025, including English-language studies and grey literature. Eligible studies reported calculable prevalence using cross-sectional, cohort, or longitudinal designs. Two reviewers independently assessed records, extracted data, and evaluated bias using the NHLBI and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tools. In 22 studies (13 from developing, 9 from developed countries), dispensing error rates ranged from 0.001% to 11.53%, higher in community (mean 4.12%) than in outpatient pharmacies (1.85%). Common errors were wrong dose/ strength (58.6%) and look-/sound-alike drugs (47.90%). Key contributors were workload (55%), staff shortages (22%), and illegible prescriptions (30.70%). While one study reported a modest 1.40% decrease with electronic prescribing, another observed up to a 98.20% reduction using automated systems. GRADE evaluation found very low confidence in the data due to variability in study settings and methods. Dispensing errors remain a major issue, particularly in community pharmacies and underserved areas. Multimodal strategies - integrating technology, standardizing workflows, and training staff - represent a potentially effective approach to reducing errors. Although the certainty of the evidence is very low, the findings may still help guide future policies aimed at introducing error reporting systems, adopting technology, and improving consistency in research methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 4","pages":"134-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12684999/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_61_25
Fatema Alrashed, Mohammad Shehab
Objective: Chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and hypertension (HTN) are the leading causes of global morbidity and mortality. Pharmacological management of these conditions is crucial. Demographic factors may affect medication utilization. Thus, our aim is to investigate associations between patients' demographics and chronic medication utilization.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing electronic medical records of adult patients with at least one chronic condition. Data were collected over 12 months, from September 2023 to September 2024, across multiple internal medicine clinics within a secondary care hospital. Our principal outcome was the association between patients' demographics (age and gender) and chronic medication use. Data collected included demographic details, diagnoses, laboratory results, and prescribed medications. Chi-square test was used to evaluate associations between demographic variables and chronic medication classes.
Findings: This study included 501 patients with different chronic diseases such as diabetes, HTN, and dyslipidemia. More than half of the cohort was females (54.1%). The mean age was 64 years. Significant age-related differences were observed across multiple medication classes including antihypertensives, lipid-lowering agents, and anticoagulants (P < 0.001). Gender differences were minimal, with the only significant association was found in the use of antiplatelets, which were prescribed more in males (P = 0.0001).
Conclusion: This study offers data about the relationship between chronic medication utilization and demographics. Age is a significant determinant of chronic medication prescribed in a secondary care setting, while gender has a more limited impact. Our findings can be instrumental in policy decisions and serve as a basis for future research.
{"title":"Associations between Patients' Demographics and Chronic Medication Utilization in Internal Medicine: Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Fatema Alrashed, Mohammad Shehab","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_61_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_61_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, and hypertension (HTN) are the leading causes of global morbidity and mortality. Pharmacological management of these conditions is crucial. Demographic factors may affect medication utilization. Thus, our aim is to investigate associations between patients' demographics and chronic medication utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted by reviewing electronic medical records of adult patients with at least one chronic condition. Data were collected over 12 months, from September 2023 to September 2024, across multiple internal medicine clinics within a secondary care hospital. Our principal outcome was the association between patients' demographics (age and gender) and chronic medication use. Data collected included demographic details, diagnoses, laboratory results, and prescribed medications. Chi-square test was used to evaluate associations between demographic variables and chronic medication classes.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>This study included 501 patients with different chronic diseases such as diabetes, HTN, and dyslipidemia. More than half of the cohort was females (54.1%). The mean age was 64 years. Significant age-related differences were observed across multiple medication classes including antihypertensives, lipid-lowering agents, and anticoagulants (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Gender differences were minimal, with the only significant association was found in the use of antiplatelets, which were prescribed more in males (<i>P</i> = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study offers data about the relationship between chronic medication utilization and demographics. Age is a significant determinant of chronic medication prescribed in a secondary care setting, while gender has a more limited impact. Our findings can be instrumental in policy decisions and serve as a basis for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 4","pages":"146-151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685001/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714862","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-19eCollection Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_50_25
Adam Mann
Objective: This study aims to investigate how machine learning (ML) contributes to drug repurposing efforts in oncology, considering the pharmaceutical industry's mounting R and D inefficiencies and economic pressures. Through qualitative interviews with experts across artificial intelligence, oncology, and pharmaceutical development, this paper explores the real-world applications of ML in this field, the challenges to its implementation, and its future potential to streamline drug discovery.
Methods: This study employed the "research onion" framework (Saunders etal., 2016), adopting an interpretivist philosophy and inductive approach to explore stakeholder perspectives on integrating ML into oncological drug repurposing. A multimethod strategy combined a narrative literature review with 13 semi-structured interviews, selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-step framework, supported by NVivo. Research trustworthiness was ensured via Lincoln and Guba's criteria, and ethical approval was granted by Imperial College London.
Findings: Three major thematic domains emerged: The technological, regulatory, and business landscapes. Technological challenges included poor data quality, limited accessibility to real-world datasets, and the need for robust infrastructure to support predictive modeling. Regulatory barriers are centered on ethical concerns in data governance and the difficulty of securing exclusivity and market protection for repurposed drugs. From a business perspective, profitability concerns, generic competition, and fragmented data ownership underscored the need for more collaborative and economically sustainable models.
Conclusion: ML offers potential for oncological drug repurposing, but realizing its benefits requires addressing key technological, regulatory, and economic challenges.
目的:考虑到制药行业日益增长的研发效率低下和经济压力,本研究旨在探讨机器学习(ML)如何有助于肿瘤药物的重新利用。通过对人工智能、肿瘤学和药物开发领域的专家进行定性访谈,本文探讨了机器学习在该领域的实际应用,其实施的挑战,以及其简化药物发现的未来潜力。方法:本研究采用“研究洋葱”框架(Saunders et al., 2016),采用解释主义哲学和归纳方法,探讨利益相关者将机器学习整合到肿瘤药物再利用中的观点。多方法策略结合了叙述性文献综述和13个半结构化访谈,通过有目的和滚雪球抽样选择。在NVivo的支持下,使用Braun和Clarke的六步框架对数据进行主题分析。研究的可信度通过林肯和古巴的标准得到了保证,并且得到了伦敦帝国理工学院的伦理批准。研究结果:出现了三个主要的主题领域:技术、监管和商业环境。技术挑战包括数据质量差,对真实数据集的可访问性有限,以及需要强大的基础设施来支持预测建模。监管障碍主要集中在数据治理中的伦理问题,以及确保再用途药物的专用性和市场保护的困难。从商业角度来看,盈利能力问题、通用竞争和分散的数据所有权强调了对更具协作性和经济可持续性模式的需求。结论:机器学习为肿瘤药物再利用提供了潜力,但实现其优势需要解决关键的技术、监管和经济挑战。
{"title":"Evaluating the Role of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Oncology Drug Repurposing Efforts.","authors":"Adam Mann","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_50_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_50_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate how machine learning (ML) contributes to drug repurposing efforts in oncology, considering the pharmaceutical industry's mounting R and D inefficiencies and economic pressures. Through qualitative interviews with experts across artificial intelligence, oncology, and pharmaceutical development, this paper explores the real-world applications of ML in this field, the challenges to its implementation, and its future potential to streamline drug discovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed the \"research onion\" framework (Saunders <i>et</i> <i>al</i>., 2016), adopting an interpretivist philosophy and inductive approach to explore stakeholder perspectives on integrating ML into oncological drug repurposing. A multimethod strategy combined a narrative literature review with 13 semi-structured interviews, selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were thematically analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-step framework, supported by NVivo. Research trustworthiness was ensured via Lincoln and Guba's criteria, and ethical approval was granted by Imperial College London.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Three major thematic domains emerged: The technological, regulatory, and business landscapes. Technological challenges included poor data quality, limited accessibility to real-world datasets, and the need for robust infrastructure to support predictive modeling. Regulatory barriers are centered on ethical concerns in data governance and the difficulty of securing exclusivity and market protection for repurposed drugs. From a business perspective, profitability concerns, generic competition, and fragmented data ownership underscored the need for more collaborative and economically sustainable models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ML offers potential for oncological drug repurposing, but realizing its benefits requires addressing key technological, regulatory, and economic challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 4","pages":"152-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12685000/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: Many antibiotics currently in use show limited effectiveness against Acinetobacter baumannii due to its high resistance. The current investigation set out to assess the synergistic effect of colistin in combination with levofloxacin and meropenem to provide an appropriate antibiotic regimen for infections caused by multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (MDR-AB).
Methods: Utilizing the broth microdilution approach, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of levofloxacin, colistin, and meropenem versus isolates of MDR-AB obtained from hospitalized individuals with nosocomial infections caused by this pathogen was ascertained. The checkerboard approach was also used to determine the antibiotics' simultaneous effects on the pathogen.
Findings: Twenty isolates underwent testing. Every isolate was meropenem-resistant. Conversely, all 20 isolates showed sensitivity to colistin, with a MIC range of 0.031-2 µg/mL. The synergy test revealed that no instances of antagonistic interactions existed between meropenem and colistin in 60% of isolates, indicating partial synergy (additive impact). However, only 40% of isolates demonstrated partial synergism with no instances of antagonistic behavior when colistin and levofloxacin were administered together.
Conclusion: Levofloxacin and meropenem exhibit respectable synergistic effects when combined with colistin; as a result, these combinations may be clinically assessed for MDR-AB infections.
{"title":"Evaluation of Synergistic Effect of Colistin with Levofloxacin and Meropenem against Multidrug-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i>.","authors":"Fatemeh Shafiee, Rasool Soltani, Mahnaz Momenzadeh","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_60_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_60_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Many antibiotics currently in use show limited effectiveness against <i>Acinetobacter baumannii</i> due to its high resistance. The current investigation set out to assess the synergistic effect of colistin in combination with levofloxacin and meropenem to provide an appropriate antibiotic regimen for infections caused by multidrug-resistant <i>A. baumannii</i> (MDR-AB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing the broth microdilution approach, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of levofloxacin, colistin, and meropenem versus isolates of MDR-AB obtained from hospitalized individuals with nosocomial infections caused by this pathogen was ascertained. The checkerboard approach was also used to determine the antibiotics' simultaneous effects on the pathogen.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Twenty isolates underwent testing. Every isolate was meropenem-resistant. Conversely, all 20 isolates showed sensitivity to colistin, with a MIC range of 0.031-2 µg/mL. The synergy test revealed that no instances of antagonistic interactions existed between meropenem and colistin in 60% of isolates, indicating partial synergy (additive impact). However, only 40% of isolates demonstrated partial synergism with no instances of antagonistic behavior when colistin and levofloxacin were administered together.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Levofloxacin and meropenem exhibit respectable synergistic effects when combined with colistin; as a result, these combinations may be clinically assessed for MDR-AB infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 4","pages":"169-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12684997/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145714844","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate factors associated with glucocorticoid (GC) self-medication during the COVID-19 pandemic and to describe its clinical consequences.
Methods: Self-medication practices and disease activity were assessed in rheumatoid arthritis patients before and after the hospital closure due to the COVID-19 pandemic through telephone survey and clinical record review. GC toxicity was evaluated using a modified Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI). Comparisons were performed using statistical tests as appropriate.
Findings: Following the hospital's reopening, 51% of patients had modified their GC dose ("changers"), while 49% maintained the same dose ("nonchangers"). Lower adherence to methotrexate (MTX) was significantly associated with self-medication (P < 0.001). Self-medication correlated with increased C-reactive protein levels and pain perception but did not alter clinical activity score. The GTI revealed more infections and neurological effects in the changer group.
Conclusion: MTX nonadherence was the primary determinant of GC self-medication during the hospital closure. Although transient, this behavior was associated with increased inflammatory markers, pain perception, and adverse events.
{"title":"Factors Associated with Self-medication with Glucocorticoids during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Their Clinical Consequences in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Before-and-after Study.","authors":"Adriana-Alejandra Moctezuma-Ocampo, Daniel-Xavier Xibillé-Friedmann, José-Iván Martínez-Rivera, Diana-Lizbeth Gómez-Galicia, José-Luis Montiel-Hernández","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_30_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_30_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to evaluate factors associated with glucocorticoid (GC) self-medication during the COVID-19 pandemic and to describe its clinical consequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-medication practices and disease activity were assessed in rheumatoid arthritis patients before and after the hospital closure due to the COVID-19 pandemic through telephone survey and clinical record review. GC toxicity was evaluated using a modified Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index (GTI). Comparisons were performed using statistical tests as appropriate.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Following the hospital's reopening, 51% of patients had modified their GC dose (\"changers\"), while 49% maintained the same dose (\"nonchangers\"). Lower adherence to methotrexate (MTX) was significantly associated with self-medication (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Self-medication correlated with increased C-reactive protein levels and pain perception but did not alter clinical activity score. The GTI revealed more infections and neurological effects in the changer group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MTX nonadherence was the primary determinant of GC self-medication during the hospital closure. Although transient, this behavior was associated with increased inflammatory markers, pain perception, and adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 3","pages":"120-125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12560984/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145401192","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-06eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_38_25
Zahra Saberi, Rasool Soltani, Zahra Vatankhah, Mehdi Saffaran Khouzani
Objective: There is no evidence regarding the efficacy of bamboo salt in the treatment of recurrent aphthous ulceration. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of bamboo salt mouthwash in comparison to benzydamine hydrochloride in the treatment of recurrent aphthous ulceration.
Methods: This randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed on 40 patients diagnosed with minor recurrent aphthous ulceration. Patients were randomized to use bamboo salt or benzydamine mouthwashes for 5 days. Patients in both groups were instructed to use 30 mL of mouthwash every 8 h for 30 s each day. Study outcomes, comprising ulcer size, pain, healing time, and patients' satisfaction, were recorded by investigators.
Findings: The adjusted between-group analyses showed that the mean ulcer size reduction was significantly greater in the bamboo salt group than the benzydamine hydrochloride group (mean difference: -1.40 ± 0.53; P = 0.01) on day 3. In addition, a marginally significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of ulcer size reduction on day 5 (P = 0.07) and pain score reduction on day 3 (P = 0.06). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the mean duration of ulcer healing, both in the crude and adjusted analyses (P < 0.05). Patients' satisfaction was significantly higher in the bamboo salt group than in the benzydamine hydrochloride group (P = 0.03).
Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that the mouthwash of bamboo salt may be considered an effective option in the management of recurrent aphthous ulceration. However, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.
{"title":"Evaluating Therapeutic Efficacy of Bamboo Salt Mouthwash Compared to Benzydamine Hydrochloride Mouthwash for Recurrent Aphthous Ulceration: A Double-blind Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Zahra Saberi, Rasool Soltani, Zahra Vatankhah, Mehdi Saffaran Khouzani","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_38_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_38_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>There is no evidence regarding the efficacy of bamboo salt in the treatment of recurrent aphthous ulceration. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of bamboo salt mouthwash in comparison to benzydamine hydrochloride in the treatment of recurrent aphthous ulceration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed on 40 patients diagnosed with minor recurrent aphthous ulceration. Patients were randomized to use bamboo salt or benzydamine mouthwashes for 5 days. Patients in both groups were instructed to use 30 mL of mouthwash every 8 h for 30 s each day. Study outcomes, comprising ulcer size, pain, healing time, and patients' satisfaction, were recorded by investigators.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The adjusted between-group analyses showed that the mean ulcer size reduction was significantly greater in the bamboo salt group than the benzydamine hydrochloride group (mean difference: -1.40 ± 0.53; <i>P</i> = 0.01) on day 3. In addition, a marginally significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of ulcer size reduction on day 5 (<i>P</i> = 0.07) and pain score reduction on day 3 (<i>P</i> = 0.06). There was a significant difference between the two groups in the mean duration of ulcer healing, both in the crude and adjusted analyses (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Patients' satisfaction was significantly higher in the bamboo salt group than in the benzydamine hydrochloride group (<i>P</i> = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study demonstrated that the mouthwash of bamboo salt may be considered an effective option in the management of recurrent aphthous ulceration. However, further studies are needed to confirm our findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 3","pages":"112-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12560975/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145401211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-06eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_51_25
Hadi Hamishehkar, Mehrdad Shahidi
This review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the future of clinical pharmacy practice and hospital settings. To achieve this, a thorough literature search was conducted across major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar, covering studies published up to July 2025. Relevant keywords - such as "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," "clinical pharmacy," "hospital pharmacy," "medication management," and "decision support systems" - were used to identify studies assessing the applications, challenges, and outcomes of AI in these contexts. All eligible articles were narratively analyzed. The findings indicated that AI has a significant role in optimizing pharmaceutical inventory management, reducing medication errors, enhancing the accuracy and safety of drug dispensing, and streamlining drug distribution processes in hospital environments. Advancements in machine learning algorithms and clinical decision support systems not only assist pharmacists in selecting optimal therapeutic regimens and detecting drug-drug interactions but also facilitate the delivery of personalized patient care and prediction of medication needs. In addition, AI integration was shown to improve workflow efficiency, reduce administrative workload, and enhance both pharmacist training and job satisfaction. In conclusion, the integration of AI into clinical pharmacy and hospital settings emerges as a transformative factor, promising to elevate the quality of pharmaceutical care, improve patient outcomes, and shape a more dynamic and efficient future for the pharmacy profession.
本综述旨在全面评估人工智能(AI)对未来临床药学实践和医院环境的影响。为此,在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase和谷歌Scholar等主要数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,涵盖了截至2025年7月发表的研究。相关关键词——如“人工智能”、“机器学习”、“临床药学”、“医院药学”、“药物管理”和“决策支持系统”——被用于识别评估人工智能在这些环境中的应用、挑战和结果的研究。对所有符合条件的文章进行叙述性分析。研究结果表明,人工智能在优化药品库存管理、减少用药错误、提高药品调剂的准确性和安全性以及简化医院环境下的药品分发流程方面具有重要作用。机器学习算法和临床决策支持系统的进步不仅可以帮助药剂师选择最佳治疗方案和检测药物-药物相互作用,还可以促进个性化患者护理和药物需求预测的提供。此外,人工智能集成被证明可以提高工作流程效率,减少行政工作量,并提高药剂师培训和工作满意度。总之,将人工智能整合到临床药学和医院环境中是一个变革性的因素,有望提高药学服务的质量,改善患者的治疗效果,并为药学专业塑造一个更有活力和更高效的未来。
{"title":"Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Future of Clinical Pharmacy and Hospital Settings.","authors":"Hadi Hamishehkar, Mehrdad Shahidi","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_51_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_51_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review aimed to comprehensively evaluate the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the future of clinical pharmacy practice and hospital settings. To achieve this, a thorough literature search was conducted across major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar, covering studies published up to July 2025. Relevant keywords - such as \"artificial intelligence,\" \"machine learning,\" \"clinical pharmacy,\" \"hospital pharmacy,\" \"medication management,\" and \"decision support systems\" - were used to identify studies assessing the applications, challenges, and outcomes of AI in these contexts. All eligible articles were narratively analyzed. The findings indicated that AI has a significant role in optimizing pharmaceutical inventory management, reducing medication errors, enhancing the accuracy and safety of drug dispensing, and streamlining drug distribution processes in hospital environments. Advancements in machine learning algorithms and clinical decision support systems not only assist pharmacists in selecting optimal therapeutic regimens and detecting drug-drug interactions but also facilitate the delivery of personalized patient care and prediction of medication needs. In addition, AI integration was shown to improve workflow efficiency, reduce administrative workload, and enhance both pharmacist training and job satisfaction. In conclusion, the integration of AI into clinical pharmacy and hospital settings emerges as a transformative factor, promising to elevate the quality of pharmaceutical care, improve patient outcomes, and shape a more dynamic and efficient future for the pharmacy profession.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 3","pages":"87-97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12560970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145401152","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-06eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_43_25
Sultan M Alshahrani, Ahmed Khaled Shukri
Objective: Mobile health (mHealth) applications are widely acknowledged as beneficial interventions for enhancing medication adherence in patients with chronic conditions, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Despite the extensive smartphone prevalence in Saudi Arabia, the practical utilization of mHealth applications for diabetes self-management remains constrained. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes, willingness, and obstacles regarding the use of mHealth applications for medication adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with 489 adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus across healthcare facilities and digital platforms in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire had five domains: demographics, technological utilization, attitudes, willingness, and perceived obstacles. Descriptive analyses were conducted with SPSS.
Findings: The majority of participants had a favorable disposition toward mHealth tools. The majority concurred that applications may facilitate adherence and favored interfaces in Arabic. Whereas 71.0% indicated a readiness to utilize mHealth, barely 37.0% were actively employing such applications. Principal obstacles encompassed forgetfulness, feelings of being overwhelmed, adverse effects, financial constraints, and restricted digital accessibility. Cultural and behavioral factors, including the utilization of herbal treatments and religious considerations, also impacted app usage.
Conclusion: mHealth possesses significant potential to enhance medication adherence among Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, successful implementation relies on overcoming behavioral, cultural, and infrastructural obstacles. These findings underscore the necessity for customized, Arabic-compatible digital health solutions that match with the objectives of Saudi Vision 2030.
{"title":"Exploring Patient Perspectives and Willingness to Use Mobile Health Applications for Diabetes Medication Adherence: A Descriptive and Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Sultan M Alshahrani, Ahmed Khaled Shukri","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_43_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_43_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) applications are widely acknowledged as beneficial interventions for enhancing medication adherence in patients with chronic conditions, including type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Despite the extensive smartphone prevalence in Saudi Arabia, the practical utilization of mHealth applications for diabetes self-management remains constrained. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes, willingness, and obstacles regarding the use of mHealth applications for medication adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was performed with 489 adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus across healthcare facilities and digital platforms in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire had five domains: demographics, technological utilization, attitudes, willingness, and perceived obstacles. Descriptive analyses were conducted with SPSS.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The majority of participants had a favorable disposition toward mHealth tools. The majority concurred that applications may facilitate adherence and favored interfaces in Arabic. Whereas 71.0% indicated a readiness to utilize mHealth, barely 37.0% were actively employing such applications. Principal obstacles encompassed forgetfulness, feelings of being overwhelmed, adverse effects, financial constraints, and restricted digital accessibility. Cultural and behavioral factors, including the utilization of herbal treatments and religious considerations, also impacted app usage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>mHealth possesses significant potential to enhance medication adherence among Saudi patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, successful implementation relies on overcoming behavioral, cultural, and infrastructural obstacles. These findings underscore the necessity for customized, Arabic-compatible digital health solutions that match with the objectives of Saudi Vision 2030.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 3","pages":"105-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12560993/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145401161","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-06eCollection Date: 2025-07-01DOI: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_34_25
Hadi Hayat
Objective: In many emerging economies, simple cost-plus markups push medicine prices far above reference benchmarks, undermining affordability and access. Iran exemplifies this problem, with a public sector median price ratio (MPR) of 6.70 - nearly seven times the reference price - and an out-of-pocket (OOP) burden exceeding 50%. This study aims to benchmark Iran's cost-plus pricing framework against international alternatives, quantify the independent effects of cost-plus dominance and inflation on relative prices, and model policy scenarios to reduce household spending.
Methods: We compared eleven countries (high-income: Germany, France, UK; upper-middle-income: South Korea, China, Brazil, Turkey, South Africa, Thailand; lower-middle-income: Iran, India) using WHO/HAI surveys (2023) to derive public/private MPRs, OOP percentages, and availability metrics. An ordinary-least-squares regression of ln (MPR) on cost-plus dominance (binary), log GDP per capita, and consumer-price-index (CPI) inflation quantified key drivers. Scenario modeling for Iran estimated OOP impacts under (i) a 30% CPI-adjusted cap (MPR = 4.69) and (ii) an health-technology assessment (HTA)-linked value-based regime (MPR = 2.00).
Findings: Iran's cost-plus system predicts a 178% higher MPR (β = 1.02; P < 0.001); each 1% inflation adds 2% to ln (MPR) (β = 0.02; P < 0.001). Under a CPI cap, OOP falls from 52% to 35%; HTA-based pricing could halve OOP to 20%.
Conclusion: Static cost-plus pricing perpetuates catastrophic patient costs. Phased reforms - beginning with CPI-indexed ceilings and advancing to HTA-driven value pricing - can transform unaffordable systems into sustainable, equitable models for emerging markets.
目标:在许多新兴经济体,简单的成本加价使药品价格远远高于参考基准,损害了可负担性和可及性。伊朗是这一问题的典型例子,其公共部门价格比率中位数(MPR)为6.70,几乎是参考价格的7倍,自费负担(OOP)超过50%。本研究旨在将伊朗的成本加定价框架与国际替代方案进行比较,量化成本加主导地位和通货膨胀对相对价格的独立影响,并建立减少家庭支出的政策情景模型。方法:我们比较了11个国家(高收入国家:德国、法国、英国;中高收入国家:韩国、中国、巴西、土耳其、南非、泰国;中低收入国家:伊朗、印度),使用WHO/HAI调查(2023年)得出公共/私人mpr、OOP百分比和可用性指标。对成本加优势(二元)、对数人均GDP和消费者价格指数(CPI)通胀进行ln (MPR)的普通最小二乘回归,量化了关键驱动因素。对伊朗的情景建模估计了在以下情况下的OOP影响:(i)经30% cpi调整的上限(MPR = 4.69)和(ii)与卫生技术评估(HTA)挂钩的基于价值的制度(MPR = 2.00)。结果:伊朗的成本加成系统预测MPR高178% (β = 1.02; P < 0.001);每1%的通货膨胀使ln (MPR)增加2% (β = 0.02; P < 0.001)。在CPI上限下,OOP从52%降至35%;基于hta的定价可以将OOP减半至20%。结论:静态成本加成定价使灾难性的患者成本永久化。分阶段改革——从与cpi挂钩的上限开始,推进到由hta驱动的价值定价——可以将负担不起的系统转变为新兴市场可持续、公平的模式。
{"title":"From Markup to Value: Global Implications of Iran's Cost-plus Pharmaceutical Pricing for Emerging Markets.","authors":"Hadi Hayat","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_34_25","DOIUrl":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_34_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In many emerging economies, simple cost-plus markups push medicine prices far above reference benchmarks, undermining affordability and access. Iran exemplifies this problem, with a public sector median price ratio (MPR) of 6.70 - nearly seven times the reference price - and an out-of-pocket (OOP) burden exceeding 50%. This study aims to benchmark Iran's cost-plus pricing framework against international alternatives, quantify the independent effects of cost-plus dominance and inflation on relative prices, and model policy scenarios to reduce household spending.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We compared eleven countries (high-income: Germany, France, UK; upper-middle-income: South Korea, China, Brazil, Turkey, South Africa, Thailand; lower-middle-income: Iran, India) using WHO/HAI surveys (2023) to derive public/private MPRs, OOP percentages, and availability metrics. An ordinary-least-squares regression of ln (MPR) on cost-plus dominance (binary), log GDP per capita, and consumer-price-index (CPI) inflation quantified key drivers. Scenario modeling for Iran estimated OOP impacts under (i) a 30% CPI-adjusted cap (MPR = 4.69) and (ii) an health-technology assessment (HTA)-linked value-based regime (MPR = 2.00).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Iran's cost-plus system predicts a 178% higher MPR (β = 1.02; <i>P</i> < 0.001); each 1% inflation adds 2% to ln (MPR) (β = 0.02; <i>P</i> < 0.001). Under a CPI cap, OOP falls from 52% to 35%; HTA-based pricing could halve OOP to 20%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Static cost-plus pricing perpetuates catastrophic patient costs. Phased reforms - beginning with CPI-indexed ceilings and advancing to HTA-driven value pricing - can transform unaffordable systems into sustainable, equitable models for emerging markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 3","pages":"98-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12560994/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145401129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}