The level of two trace elements in carious, non-carious, primary, and permanent teeth.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Oral Research Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.26650/eor.20200072
Ruya Kuru, Gulsah Balan, Sahin Yilmaz, Pakize Neslihan Taslı, Serap Akyuz, Aysen Yarat, Fikrettin Sahin
{"title":"The level of two trace elements in carious, non-carious, primary, and permanent teeth.","authors":"Ruya Kuru,&nbsp;Gulsah Balan,&nbsp;Sahin Yilmaz,&nbsp;Pakize Neslihan Taslı,&nbsp;Serap Akyuz,&nbsp;Aysen Yarat,&nbsp;Fikrettin Sahin","doi":"10.26650/eor.20200072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The boron and fluoride mainly accumulate in the bones and teeth of the human body. The purpose of this study is to determine boron or fluoride levels in the whole tooth, to evaluate the correlation between their levels and to compare these levels in primary/permanent, carious, and non-carious groups.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The boron and fluoride levels of thirty-six teeth, separated such as primary carious (n=9) and non-carious (n=9), permanent carious (n=9) and non-carious (n=9), were determined by ICP-MS and ion-selective electrode, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While boron levels were between 0.001 and 5.88 ppm, the fluoride levels were between 21.24 and 449.22 ppm. The boron level of non-carious teeth was higher than those of carious teeth in primary and permanent tooth groups. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The fluoride level of non-carious teeth was higher than those of carious teeth in primary (p=0.062) and permanent teeth groups (p=0.046). Negative correlation, found between boron and fluoride in all groups, was significant only in non-carious teeth group (r=-0.488, p=0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of our study proved the importance of fluoride as a protective factor for dental caries once more. The boron levels in non-carious teeth were also higher than carious teeth. However, it was not significant. Moreover, there was negative correlation between teeth boron and fluoride levels. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct more detailed studies on the tooth boron level and its relation with caries formation and with fluoride levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":41993,"journal":{"name":"European Oral Research","volume":"54 2","pages":"77-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/0e/c1/eor-054-077.PMC7787518.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26650/eor.20200072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose: The boron and fluoride mainly accumulate in the bones and teeth of the human body. The purpose of this study is to determine boron or fluoride levels in the whole tooth, to evaluate the correlation between their levels and to compare these levels in primary/permanent, carious, and non-carious groups.

Materials and methods: The boron and fluoride levels of thirty-six teeth, separated such as primary carious (n=9) and non-carious (n=9), permanent carious (n=9) and non-carious (n=9), were determined by ICP-MS and ion-selective electrode, respectively.

Results: While boron levels were between 0.001 and 5.88 ppm, the fluoride levels were between 21.24 and 449.22 ppm. The boron level of non-carious teeth was higher than those of carious teeth in primary and permanent tooth groups. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p>0.05). The fluoride level of non-carious teeth was higher than those of carious teeth in primary (p=0.062) and permanent teeth groups (p=0.046). Negative correlation, found between boron and fluoride in all groups, was significant only in non-carious teeth group (r=-0.488, p=0.040).

Conclusion: The results of our study proved the importance of fluoride as a protective factor for dental caries once more. The boron levels in non-carious teeth were also higher than carious teeth. However, it was not significant. Moreover, there was negative correlation between teeth boron and fluoride levels. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct more detailed studies on the tooth boron level and its relation with caries formation and with fluoride levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
龋齿、非龋齿、乳牙和恒牙中两种微量元素的含量。
用途:硼和氟化物主要积聚在人体的骨骼和牙齿中。本研究的目的是确定整个牙齿中的硼或氟水平,评估其水平之间的相关性,并比较原发性/永久性、龋齿组和非龋齿组的硼或氟水平。材料与方法:采用ICP-MS和离子选择电极分别测定原发性龋齿(n=9)和非龋齿(n=9)、永久性龋齿(n=9)和非龋齿(n=9) 36颗牙齿的硼、氟水平。结果:硼含量在0.001 - 5.88 ppm之间,氟含量在21.24 - 449.22 ppm之间。乳牙组和恒牙组无龋组的硼含量均高于龋组。但差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。乳牙组非龋牙组氟含量高于龋牙组(p=0.062)和恒牙组(p=0.046)。硼和氟在所有组中呈负相关,仅在非龋齿组中显著(r=-0.488, p=0.040)。结论:本研究结果再次证明了氟化物作为龋病保护因子的重要性。非蛀牙的硼含量也高于蛀牙。然而,这并不显著。此外,牙齿硼和氟化物水平呈负相关。因此,有必要对牙齿硼含量及其与龋齿形成和氟化物含量的关系进行更详细的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Oral Research
European Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Biocompatibility of different resin composites after polymerization with two light curing units: an immunohistochemical study. Prophylactic and therapeutic effects of (6)-shogaol on alveolar bone loss in experimental periodontitis. Comparative evaluation of digital radiography, electronic apex locator and simultaneous working length determination on postoperative pain after root canal treatment: a randomized clinical trial Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of c-shaped canal morphology in mandibular premolar teeth The effect of three different primary teeth rotary instrument systems on the amount of apically extruded debris in pulpectomy of primary teeth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1