Increased serum CA125 II, but not CEA,CA19-9,AFP or CA72-4 in colon cancer compared to rectal cancer.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY British Journal of Biomedical Science Pub Date : 2021-10-01 Epub Date: 2021-02-12 DOI:10.1080/09674845.2020.1868685
T Liu, X Li, D Liu, S Liu, M Dong
{"title":"Increased serum CA125 II, but not CEA,CA19-9,AFP or CA72-4 in colon cancer compared to rectal cancer.","authors":"T Liu,&nbsp;X Li,&nbsp;D Liu,&nbsp;S Liu,&nbsp;M Dong","doi":"10.1080/09674845.2020.1868685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Globally, colorectal cancer is the third most frequent cancer type, with >1.4 million new cases and >690,000 deaths annually [1]. Survival from colorectal cancer is significantly dependent on the stage at diagnosis, with the 5-year rate at ~90% for localized disease, 70% for regional disease and 13% for distantly metastatic disease [2]. Several screening tests, including faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy, are frequently used in the detection of colorectal cancer. However, none are established and well-accepted screening tools due to their invasiveness, high cost or low sensitivity [3]. Therefore, the search for more sensitive, easily detected and representative biomarkers is of great significance for the early diagnosis and monitoring of this disease. Several biological and clinical hallmarks indicate that rectal cancer is different from colon cancer. The rectum and colon have a different embryological origin, anatomy and function [4]. Consequently, the treatments for primary rectal and colon cancer are different. Primary rectal cancer requires specific surgical treatment: total mesorectal excision, preceded by neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy [5]. Despite a substantial rise in survival over the last two decades, the 5-year diseasespecific overall survival rate is approximately 59% for colon cancer and 61% for rectal cancer [6]. This indicates that it is very important to explore the difference between colon cancer and rectal cancer. Tumour markers are widely useful in the management of patients with tumours. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) are the most commonly used indexes in the clinical diagnosis of colorectal cancer, but both are non-specific. CEA is a glycoprotein produced by columnar and goblet cells in the normal colon cells, as well as colonic cancer cells with a half-life of 3–11 days. CA19-9 is also a glycoprotein with high molecular weight, which may be detected in the blood of gastrointestinal cancer patients [7]. We hypothesized different expressions of CEA, CA19-9, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), cancer antigen 72–4 (CA72-4) and cancer antigen 125 II (CA125 II) between colon cancer and rectal cancer, hoping to provide reference for the different pathogenesis and treatment of these diseases. Of 219 patients with histopathologically confirmed colorectal cancer, 114 had colon cancer and 105 rectal cancer. There was no significant difference in age and gender between the colon cancer group and rectal cancer group (table 1). Five mL peripheral blood was extracted from a peripheral vein, and serum isolated by centrifugation at 2000× g for 15 min. Serum CA19-9, AFP, CA72-4 and CA125 II levels were determined by radioimmunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), with a normal upper limit of 37 U/ml, 7 ng/ml, 6.9 U/ml and 35 U/ml, respectively. The serum CEA level was determined by ELISA (Dinabot, Tokyo, Japan), with a normal upper limit of 5 ng/ml. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Version 23. Groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and results are presented as median with interquartile range (table 1). P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results are shown in table 1 and figure 1a–1e. There were no difference in levels of CEA, CA19-9, AFP or CA72.4, but levels of CA125-II were 26.5% higher in those with colon cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of serum CEA and CA19-9 expression in colorectal cancer patients is reported as 0.65 and 0.89, indicating that the serum CEA and CA19-9 expression has diagnostic value with moderate sensitivity and good specificity [8]. However, there are few reports on the difference of serum CEA and CA19-9 expression between colon cancer and rectal cancer: we found no statistically significanct difference. AFP, a glycoprotein, is derived from embryonic endoderm tissue cells. AFP content in foetal serum is high and gradually decreases to the level of adults after birth. The low content of AFP in the adult blood is mainly due to the loss of the ability to synthesize AFP in mature hepatocytes. When transformed, the liver cancer cells can regain the ability to synthesize AFP. Besides liver cancer, malignant tumours from stomach,","PeriodicalId":9236,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09674845.2020.1868685","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Biomedical Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09674845.2020.1868685","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/2/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Globally, colorectal cancer is the third most frequent cancer type, with >1.4 million new cases and >690,000 deaths annually [1]. Survival from colorectal cancer is significantly dependent on the stage at diagnosis, with the 5-year rate at ~90% for localized disease, 70% for regional disease and 13% for distantly metastatic disease [2]. Several screening tests, including faecal occult blood test and colonoscopy, are frequently used in the detection of colorectal cancer. However, none are established and well-accepted screening tools due to their invasiveness, high cost or low sensitivity [3]. Therefore, the search for more sensitive, easily detected and representative biomarkers is of great significance for the early diagnosis and monitoring of this disease. Several biological and clinical hallmarks indicate that rectal cancer is different from colon cancer. The rectum and colon have a different embryological origin, anatomy and function [4]. Consequently, the treatments for primary rectal and colon cancer are different. Primary rectal cancer requires specific surgical treatment: total mesorectal excision, preceded by neoadjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy [5]. Despite a substantial rise in survival over the last two decades, the 5-year diseasespecific overall survival rate is approximately 59% for colon cancer and 61% for rectal cancer [6]. This indicates that it is very important to explore the difference between colon cancer and rectal cancer. Tumour markers are widely useful in the management of patients with tumours. Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) are the most commonly used indexes in the clinical diagnosis of colorectal cancer, but both are non-specific. CEA is a glycoprotein produced by columnar and goblet cells in the normal colon cells, as well as colonic cancer cells with a half-life of 3–11 days. CA19-9 is also a glycoprotein with high molecular weight, which may be detected in the blood of gastrointestinal cancer patients [7]. We hypothesized different expressions of CEA, CA19-9, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), cancer antigen 72–4 (CA72-4) and cancer antigen 125 II (CA125 II) between colon cancer and rectal cancer, hoping to provide reference for the different pathogenesis and treatment of these diseases. Of 219 patients with histopathologically confirmed colorectal cancer, 114 had colon cancer and 105 rectal cancer. There was no significant difference in age and gender between the colon cancer group and rectal cancer group (table 1). Five mL peripheral blood was extracted from a peripheral vein, and serum isolated by centrifugation at 2000× g for 15 min. Serum CA19-9, AFP, CA72-4 and CA125 II levels were determined by radioimmunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), with a normal upper limit of 37 U/ml, 7 ng/ml, 6.9 U/ml and 35 U/ml, respectively. The serum CEA level was determined by ELISA (Dinabot, Tokyo, Japan), with a normal upper limit of 5 ng/ml. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Version 23. Groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and results are presented as median with interquartile range (table 1). P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results are shown in table 1 and figure 1a–1e. There were no difference in levels of CEA, CA19-9, AFP or CA72.4, but levels of CA125-II were 26.5% higher in those with colon cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of serum CEA and CA19-9 expression in colorectal cancer patients is reported as 0.65 and 0.89, indicating that the serum CEA and CA19-9 expression has diagnostic value with moderate sensitivity and good specificity [8]. However, there are few reports on the difference of serum CEA and CA19-9 expression between colon cancer and rectal cancer: we found no statistically significanct difference. AFP, a glycoprotein, is derived from embryonic endoderm tissue cells. AFP content in foetal serum is high and gradually decreases to the level of adults after birth. The low content of AFP in the adult blood is mainly due to the loss of the ability to synthesize AFP in mature hepatocytes. When transformed, the liver cancer cells can regain the ability to synthesize AFP. Besides liver cancer, malignant tumours from stomach,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与直肠癌相比,结肠癌患者血清CA125 II升高,而CEA、CA19-9、AFP或CA72-4不升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Biomedical Science
British Journal of Biomedical Science 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
15.80%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Biomedical Science is committed to publishing high quality original research that represents a clear advance in the practice of biomedical science, and reviews that summarise recent advances in the field of biomedical science. The overall aim of the Journal is to provide a platform for the dissemination of new and innovative information on the diagnosis and management of disease that is valuable to the practicing laboratory scientist.
期刊最新文献
Improving Biomedical Science Literacy and Patient-Directed Knowledge of Tuberculosis (TB): A Cross-Sectional Infodemiology Study Examining Readability of Patient-Facing TB Information. Mesoporous Silica Microparticle-Protein Complexes: Effects of Protein Size and Solvent Properties on Diffusion and Loading Efficiency. Neuronal Vulnerability of the Entorhinal Cortex to Tau Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease. Evaluating Lung Changes in Long COVID: Ultra-Low-Dose vs. Standard-Dose CT Chest. Editorial: Advances in Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1