Construction and validation of an instrument to measure knowledge of mothers and caregivers on complementary feeding of infants.

Marco Sierra-Zúñiga, Claudia Holguin Betancourt, Andry Yasmid Mera-Mamián, Mario Delgado-Noguera, José Andrés Calvache
{"title":"Construction and validation of an instrument to measure knowledge of mothers and caregivers on complementary feeding of infants.","authors":"Marco Sierra-Zúñiga,&nbsp;Claudia Holguin Betancourt,&nbsp;Andry Yasmid Mera-Mamián,&nbsp;Mario Delgado-Noguera,&nbsp;José Andrés Calvache","doi":"10.32641/rchped.vi91i5.1078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Adequate nutrition during the first two years of life is crucial for the full development of human potential. Inadequate, early, or late introduction of complementary feeding has consequences in the short- and long-term. Complementary feeding depends largely on the knowledge of the caregiver who, in Latin American countries, is usually the mother.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To create and validate an ins trument to measure knowledge about complementary feeding.</p><p><strong>Subjects and method: </strong>Observational study in which 80 community mothers and 12 expert pediatricians participated. It was carried out in two stages, the creation of the instrument (following the 7 phases proposed by Sampieri) and the va lidation through the evaluation of the apparent validity, construct and content validity, internal con sistency, and intra-observer reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A self-administered instrument was created that ini tially included 14 questions about maternal and caregiver's knowledge. During the validation of the construct, 3 domains were identified and four questions were eliminated. In the content validation, 10 questions of the final instrument scored higher than 9 (on a scale of 0-10) in the characteristics of quality, vocabulary, relevance, and topicality. The global internal consistency of the instrument was moderate (Cronbach's alpha: 0.64) and the intra-observer reliability was acceptable (k: 0.21-0.40) for 80% of its items.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the first self-administered instrument validated in the region to measure the knowledge of mothers and caregivers about complementary feeding is presented. It will allow to design and develop strategies in relation to maternal and caregiver's knowledge of comple mentary feeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":46023,"journal":{"name":"Revista Chilena de Pediatria-Chile","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Chilena de Pediatria-Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32641/rchped.vi91i5.1078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Introduction: Adequate nutrition during the first two years of life is crucial for the full development of human potential. Inadequate, early, or late introduction of complementary feeding has consequences in the short- and long-term. Complementary feeding depends largely on the knowledge of the caregiver who, in Latin American countries, is usually the mother.

Objective: To create and validate an ins trument to measure knowledge about complementary feeding.

Subjects and method: Observational study in which 80 community mothers and 12 expert pediatricians participated. It was carried out in two stages, the creation of the instrument (following the 7 phases proposed by Sampieri) and the va lidation through the evaluation of the apparent validity, construct and content validity, internal con sistency, and intra-observer reliability.

Results: A self-administered instrument was created that ini tially included 14 questions about maternal and caregiver's knowledge. During the validation of the construct, 3 domains were identified and four questions were eliminated. In the content validation, 10 questions of the final instrument scored higher than 9 (on a scale of 0-10) in the characteristics of quality, vocabulary, relevance, and topicality. The global internal consistency of the instrument was moderate (Cronbach's alpha: 0.64) and the intra-observer reliability was acceptable (k: 0.21-0.40) for 80% of its items.

Conclusions: the first self-administered instrument validated in the region to measure the knowledge of mothers and caregivers about complementary feeding is presented. It will allow to design and develop strategies in relation to maternal and caregiver's knowledge of comple mentary feeding.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建和验证一种测量母亲和照顾者对婴儿补充喂养知识的工具。
生命最初两年的充足营养对人类潜能的充分发展至关重要。不充分、过早或过晚地引入补充喂养会造成短期和长期的后果。辅食喂养在很大程度上取决于照顾者的知识,在拉丁美洲国家,照顾者通常是母亲。目的:建立并验证一种辅助喂养知识测量仪器。对象和方法:观察性研究,80名社区母亲和12名儿科专家参与。该研究分两个阶段进行,即工具的创建(遵循Sampieri提出的7个阶段)和通过评估表观效度、结构和内容效度、内部一致性和观察者内部信度进行验证。结果:创建了一个自我管理的工具,最初包括14个关于母亲和照顾者知识的问题。在结构的验证过程中,识别了3个域,消除了4个问题。在内容验证中,最终工具的10个问题在质量、词汇、相关性和话题性特征上得分高于9分(0-10分)。该仪器的整体内部一致性为中等(Cronbach's alpha: 0.64), 80%的项目的观察者内部信度是可接受的(k: 0.21-0.40)。结论:提出了该地区第一个自我管理的工具,用于测量母亲和照顾者关于补充喂养的知识。它将有助于设计和制定与孕产妇和照料者补充喂养知识有关的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Compromiso renal agudo en COVID-19 Inmunodeficiencia Combinada Severa, reporte de pacientes chilenos diagnosticados durante el período 1999-2020 Apendicitis aguda perforada con diagnóstico prequirúrgico y hernia inguinal bilateral en recién nacido de pretérmino Una nueva mirada a los determinantes del peso infantil en la primera infancia Reintervención Quirúrgica No Programada: un análisis de calidad de la atención
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1