Differences in the quality of life of chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2021-04-14 DOI:10.4081/jphr.2021.2209

Ika Setyo Rini, Titik Rahmayani, Efris Kartika Sari, Retno Lestari

{"title":"Differences in the quality of life of chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.","authors":"Ika Setyo Rini, Titik Rahmayani, Efris Kartika Sari, Retno Lestari","doi":"10.4081/jphr.2021.2209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as a progressive disease that causes renal failure and requires extended and long-term therapies. CKD patients need to choose one of these therapies to improve their quality of life. This study aims to investigate differences in the quality of life of chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).Design and methods: The study design used is similar to the cross-sectional design. Therefore, in this study observations were carried out, a EQ_5D life quality questionnaire sheet was administered to respondents, and a purposive sampling method was used. The total number of respondents was 250 and consisted of 125 hemodialysis and CAPD patients each.Results: The results obtained using the Mann Whitney method was a p-value (0.515)> α (0.05). These results also included five components, namely the ability to move/walk to an acceptable degree, adequate self-care, performance of usual activities, minimal amount of pain/discomfort during hemodialysis and CAPD, and acceptable levels of anxiety/sadness.Conclusions: This research concludes that there is no difference in the quality of life between CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis and CAPD.","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/84/79/jphr-10-2-2209.PMC8129769.pdf","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2021.2209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is defined as a progressive disease that causes renal failure and requires extended and long-term therapies. CKD patients need to choose one of these therapies to improve their quality of life. This study aims to investigate differences in the quality of life of chronic kidney disease patients undergoing hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD).

Design and methods: The study design used is similar to the cross-sectional design. Therefore, in this study observations were carried out, a EQ_5D life quality questionnaire sheet was administered to respondents, and a purposive sampling method was used. The total number of respondents was 250 and consisted of 125 hemodialysis and CAPD patients each.

Results: The results obtained using the Mann Whitney method was a p-value (0.515)> α (0.05). These results also included five components, namely the ability to move/walk to an acceptable degree, adequate self-care, performance of usual activities, minimal amount of pain/discomfort during hemodialysis and CAPD, and acceptable levels of anxiety/sadness.

Conclusions: This research concludes that there is no difference in the quality of life between CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis and CAPD.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

慢性肾脏病患者接受血液透析和连续非卧床腹膜透析的生活质量差异。

背景:慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)被定义为一种导致肾功能衰竭的进行性疾病，需要长期治疗。CKD患者需要选择其中一种治疗方法来改善生活质量。本研究旨在探讨慢性肾脏疾病患者接受血液透析和持续门诊腹膜透析(CAPD)的生活质量差异。设计与方法:采用的研究设计与横断面设计相似。因此，本研究采用目的性抽样的方法，对被调查者发放了EQ_5D生活质量问卷。调查对象总数为250人，其中血液透析患者和CAPD患者各125人。结果:Mann Whitney法得到的结果p值(0.515)> α(0.05)。这些结果还包括五个组成部分，即移动/行走到可接受程度的能力，足够的自我护理，日常活动的表现，血液透析和CAPD期间最小程度的疼痛/不适，以及可接受的焦虑/悲伤水平。结论:本研究得出CKD患者接受血液透析与CAPD患者的生活质量无差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

4.30%

发文量

116

审稿时长

10 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.