I. How can you choose the fate of iPSCs and stem cells, Regeneration or Carcinogenesis? A hypothetical insight.: II. Modelling human beta cell development with pluripotent stem cells.

IF 1.1 Q4 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-11 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.46582/jsrm.1602013
Masaharu Seno, Maria Cristina Nostro
{"title":"I. How can you choose the fate of iPSCs and stem cells, Regeneration or Carcinogenesis? A hypothetical insight.: II. Modelling human beta cell development with pluripotent stem cells.","authors":"Masaharu Seno,&nbsp;Maria Cristina Nostro","doi":"10.46582/jsrm.1602013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It is nowadays taken granted that induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are available for the regeneration therapy since iPSCs differentiate into any kind of phenotypes. If iPSCs can choose their fate in every way of differentiation why they do not choose cancer phenotype. As a body develops for one fertilized egg, embryonic stem cell must choose every phenotype of tissues such as blood, neuron, lung, liver, pancreas and so on depending on the stages. And sometimes the cells get cancer. So do iPSCs because iPSCs are almost equivalent to embryonic cells. Then how can the safety of the regeneration therapy be maintained with iPSCs? When inducing the differentiation of iPSCs it is considered important to choose the proper conditions of culture such as 3D-platform for embryoid, supplement of cytokines and growth factors, inhibition of signaling and so on. On the other hand, several conditions have been reported to induce cancer stem cells. The cancer inducing conditions are possibly summarized as the factors chronically exposed to iPSCs. It is further worthwhile noticing that the conditions do not appear to induce mutations but affecting the epigenetics. Collectively, to secure the safety of regeneration therapy, it appears the best way to avoid the conditions to induce cancer stem cells. Further insights in details will be discussed in the lecture. Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by destruction of the pancreatic beta cells and loss of insulin. Using the Edmonton protocol, donor-derived islets seeded into the liver successfully restore glycemia in 58% of T1D patients. However, donor scarcity, risks associated with immunosuppressants and poor engraftment limit this therapeutic application to a small number of patients. To overcome these challenges, the developmental potential of human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent stem cells is being harnessed to produce surrogate islets in vitro. We and others have been able to mimic human embryonic development and generate pancreatic progenitors (PP) that have the ability to mature into insulin-producing beta-like cells both in vitro and in vivo. Transplantation of pancreatic progenitors in the kidney capsule of immunodeficient mice leads to formation of islet-like structures that secrete human insulin. However, there are some limitations to the use of pancreatic progenitors for the treatment of T1D. First and foremost, their safety as the PP population can be heterogenous and highly proliferative, which might lead to formation of cellular outgrowth or teratoma after transplantation. Second, while insulin-producing cells develop in vivo 6 weeks after transplantation, restoration of normoglycemia occurs ~5 months later, suggesting that these \"early\" insulin-producing cells are immature, or poorly connected to the host vasculature. We have been addressing these two limitations and developed approaches to 1) improve safety by identifying markers to purify the PP populations and 2) accelerate functionality by improving vascularization at the time of transplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17155,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772808/pdf/jsrm_16_90.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46582/jsrm.1602013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

It is nowadays taken granted that induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are available for the regeneration therapy since iPSCs differentiate into any kind of phenotypes. If iPSCs can choose their fate in every way of differentiation why they do not choose cancer phenotype. As a body develops for one fertilized egg, embryonic stem cell must choose every phenotype of tissues such as blood, neuron, lung, liver, pancreas and so on depending on the stages. And sometimes the cells get cancer. So do iPSCs because iPSCs are almost equivalent to embryonic cells. Then how can the safety of the regeneration therapy be maintained with iPSCs? When inducing the differentiation of iPSCs it is considered important to choose the proper conditions of culture such as 3D-platform for embryoid, supplement of cytokines and growth factors, inhibition of signaling and so on. On the other hand, several conditions have been reported to induce cancer stem cells. The cancer inducing conditions are possibly summarized as the factors chronically exposed to iPSCs. It is further worthwhile noticing that the conditions do not appear to induce mutations but affecting the epigenetics. Collectively, to secure the safety of regeneration therapy, it appears the best way to avoid the conditions to induce cancer stem cells. Further insights in details will be discussed in the lecture. Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease characterized by destruction of the pancreatic beta cells and loss of insulin. Using the Edmonton protocol, donor-derived islets seeded into the liver successfully restore glycemia in 58% of T1D patients. However, donor scarcity, risks associated with immunosuppressants and poor engraftment limit this therapeutic application to a small number of patients. To overcome these challenges, the developmental potential of human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent stem cells is being harnessed to produce surrogate islets in vitro. We and others have been able to mimic human embryonic development and generate pancreatic progenitors (PP) that have the ability to mature into insulin-producing beta-like cells both in vitro and in vivo. Transplantation of pancreatic progenitors in the kidney capsule of immunodeficient mice leads to formation of islet-like structures that secrete human insulin. However, there are some limitations to the use of pancreatic progenitors for the treatment of T1D. First and foremost, their safety as the PP population can be heterogenous and highly proliferative, which might lead to formation of cellular outgrowth or teratoma after transplantation. Second, while insulin-producing cells develop in vivo 6 weeks after transplantation, restoration of normoglycemia occurs ~5 months later, suggesting that these "early" insulin-producing cells are immature, or poorly connected to the host vasculature. We have been addressing these two limitations and developed approaches to 1) improve safety by identifying markers to purify the PP populations and 2) accelerate functionality by improving vascularization at the time of transplantation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1 .如何选择多能干细胞和干细胞的命运,是再生还是致癌?假设的见解。: II。用多能干细胞模拟人类β细胞发育。
诱导多能干细胞(iPSCs)可分化为各种表型,目前被认为可用于再生治疗。如果iPSCs可以选择他们的命运在每一种分化方式,为什么他们不选择癌症表型。随着一个受精卵的发育,胚胎干细胞必须根据发育阶段选择血液、神经元、肺、肝、胰腺等组织的每一种表型。有时这些细胞会癌变。诱导多能干细胞也是如此,因为诱导多能干细胞几乎等同于胚胎细胞。那么如何用iPSCs来维持再生治疗的安全性呢?诱导iPSCs分化时,选择合适的培养条件,如胚状体3d培养平台、补充细胞因子和生长因子、抑制信号传导等是重要的。另一方面,已经报道了几种诱导癌症干细胞的条件。诱导癌症的条件可能概括为长期暴露于iPSCs的因素。值得进一步注意的是,这些条件似乎不会诱导突变,而是影响表观遗传学。总的来说,为了确保再生治疗的安全性,避免诱导癌症干细胞的条件似乎是最好的方法。进一步的细节将在讲座中讨论。1型糖尿病(T1D)是一种自身免疫性疾病,其特征是胰腺细胞的破坏和胰岛素的损失。使用埃德蒙顿方案,供体来源的胰岛植入肝脏成功地恢复了58%的T1D患者的血糖。然而,供体稀缺、与免疫抑制剂相关的风险和植入不良限制了这种治疗应用于少数患者。为了克服这些挑战,人类胚胎干细胞和人类诱导多能干细胞的发育潜力正在被利用来在体外产生替代胰岛。我们和其他人已经能够模拟人类胚胎发育,并产生胰腺祖细胞(PP),这些祖细胞在体外和体内都有能力成熟为产生胰岛素的β样细胞。将胰腺祖细胞移植到免疫缺陷小鼠的肾包膜中,可形成分泌人胰岛素的胰岛样结构。然而,使用胰腺祖细胞治疗T1D有一些局限性。首先,它们作为PP群体的安全性可能是异质的和高度增殖的,这可能导致移植后形成细胞外生物或畸胎瘤。其次,虽然胰岛素生成细胞在移植后6周在体内发育,但正常血糖的恢复发生在5个月后,这表明这些“早期”胰岛素生成细胞尚未成熟,或与宿主脉管系统连接不良。我们一直在解决这两个限制,并开发了以下方法:1)通过识别纯化PP群体的标记来提高安全性;2)通过改善移植时的血管化来加速功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Amniotic Fluid Stem Cells and Their Secretomes as tools of regenerative medicine; Influence of Donor Characteristics on Standardization. MSC secretome from amniotic fluid halts IL-1β and TNF-α inflammation via the ERK/MAPK pathway, promoting cartilage regeneration in OA in vitro. The Therapeutic Potential of Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Derived Exosomes for Wound Healing: Harnessing Exosomes as a Cell-free Therapy. Cues from evolving insights about Cancer stem cells to tackle cancer metastases. I. Biomaterials for reconstruction of bone and cartilage defects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1