A Meta-Analysis of Postpartum Copper IUD Continuation Rates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Angela Marchin, Angela Moss, Margo Harrison
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis of Postpartum Copper IUD Continuation Rates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.","authors":"Angela Marchin,&nbsp;Angela Moss,&nbsp;Margo Harrison","doi":"10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) initiated immediately postpartum can reduce unintended or mistimed pregnancies, and contribute to proper pregnancy spacing. Data on use and continuation of postpartum LARC in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, OVID, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane, POPLINE, Global Health (CABI), and LILACS databases for relevant terms. Studies of any design, published in English, were screened for relevance based on six-month continuation rates of postpartum LARC, location of study, and LARC insertion within 48 hours after vaginal or cesarean birth. We found no relevant studies of implant or hormonal intrauterine device (IUD). Therefore, analysis was limited to studies of the copper IUD only. Two authors used the Cochrane Public Health Group Data Extraction and Assessment Template to guide data extraction to estimate pooled six-month continuation rates, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies to rate the quality of the studies. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immediate-postpartum copper IUDs have a six-month continuation rate of 87% (95% CI 80-92%) in LMIC. The pooled estimated rates of six-month adverse outcomes were 6% (95% CI 5-9%) for expulsion, 5% (95% CI 4-7%) for removal, and 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-0.9%) for infection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High six-month continuation rates and a low rate of adverse outcomes suggest immediate postpartum copper IUD insertion is a feasible and acceptable postpartum contraceptive option for women living in LMIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":74017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health and development","volume":"4 1","pages":"36-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8046022/pdf/nihms-1685307.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health and development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/fjwhd.2644-28840059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) initiated immediately postpartum can reduce unintended or mistimed pregnancies, and contribute to proper pregnancy spacing. Data on use and continuation of postpartum LARC in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) is limited.

Methods: We searched PubMed, OVID, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane, POPLINE, Global Health (CABI), and LILACS databases for relevant terms. Studies of any design, published in English, were screened for relevance based on six-month continuation rates of postpartum LARC, location of study, and LARC insertion within 48 hours after vaginal or cesarean birth. We found no relevant studies of implant or hormonal intrauterine device (IUD). Therefore, analysis was limited to studies of the copper IUD only. Two authors used the Cochrane Public Health Group Data Extraction and Assessment Template to guide data extraction to estimate pooled six-month continuation rates, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies to rate the quality of the studies. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was performed.

Results: Immediate-postpartum copper IUDs have a six-month continuation rate of 87% (95% CI 80-92%) in LMIC. The pooled estimated rates of six-month adverse outcomes were 6% (95% CI 5-9%) for expulsion, 5% (95% CI 4-7%) for removal, and 0.2% (95% CI 0.0-0.9%) for infection.

Conclusions: High six-month continuation rates and a low rate of adverse outcomes suggest immediate postpartum copper IUD insertion is a feasible and acceptable postpartum contraceptive option for women living in LMIC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低收入和中等收入国家产后铜宫内节育器延续率的荟萃分析
背景:产后立即开始长效可逆避孕(LARC)可以减少意外怀孕或不合时宜的怀孕,并有助于适当的怀孕间隔。关于在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)使用和继续使用产后LARC的数据有限。方法:检索PubMed、OVID、Embase、Google Scholar、Cochrane、POPLINE、Global Health (CABI)和LILACS数据库中的相关词汇。根据产后LARC的6个月持续率、研究地点和阴道分娩或剖宫产后48小时内LARC插入,对任何设计的英文研究进行相关性筛选。我们没有发现植入或激素宫内节育器(IUD)的相关研究。因此,分析仅限于铜宫内节育器的研究。两位作者使用Cochrane公共卫生组数据提取和评估模板来指导数据提取,以估计合并的六个月持续率,并使用Cochrane随机对照试验偏倚风险工具和国家心肺血液研究所(NHLBI)观察性队列和横断面研究质量评估工具来评价研究的质量。对比例进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果:产后立即使用铜宫内节育器的LMIC患者6个月的延续率为87% (95% CI 80-92%)。6个月不良结局汇总估计率为:驱逐组为6% (95% CI 5-9%),移除组为5% (95% CI 4-7%),感染组为0.2% (95% CI 0.0-0.9%)。结论:较高的6个月延续率和较低的不良后果发生率表明,产后立即插入铜宫内节育器对低收入和中等收入国家妇女是一种可行且可接受的产后避孕选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Clinical Study on Short-Term Efficacy of Pelvic Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Pelvic Muscle Biofeedback on Female Idiopathic Overactive Bladder. Placental Fatty Acid Metabolism and Transport in a Rat Model of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. Prediction of Ovarian Cancer Survival using Machine Learning: A Population-Based Study A Principal Component Analysis of Nursing Students’ Satisfaction with Blended E-learning following the Covid-19 Pandemic Diagnosis , Management of Polycystic ovarian syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1