Urinary metabolome of infants with colic treated with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938: a pilot randomized trial.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine Minerva pediatrica Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-13 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06128-9
Francesco Savino, Vassilios Fanos, Antonio Noto, Deborah Biggio, Claudia Fattuoni, Luigi Barberini
{"title":"Urinary metabolome of infants with colic treated with Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938: a pilot randomized trial.","authors":"Francesco Savino, Vassilios Fanos, Antonio Noto, Deborah Biggio, Claudia Fattuoni, Luigi Barberini","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06128-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 is the only probiotic recommended for treatment of colicky infants, but its mechanism of action is not clear. The study aim was to examine urinary metabolomic fingerprint of colicky breastfed infants before and after 1 month of orally administered Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 or placebo.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was carried out with a well-documented probiotic. Thirty-two infants were enrolled, 16 in the probiotic group and 16 in the placebo group. Urine samples were collected from each subject before starting supplementation and at the end of the study period. Metabolomic profiles were obtained using a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry instrument. Subsequently, to compare groups before and after probiotic supplementation, univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the L. reuteri treated group all metabolites for all class of nutrients (sugars, amino acids, carboxylic acids) resulted more abundant after the study period. The comparison with a control group (placebo treated), confirmed this effect on urines.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The metabolomic analysis of urine samples from infants treated with L. reuteri DSM 17938 allowed to detect some interesting features related to the effect of this treatment on urinary metabolome. To validate the results, a test on a larger cohort is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":18533,"journal":{"name":"Minerva pediatrica","volume":" ","pages":"404-413"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.20.06128-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 is the only probiotic recommended for treatment of colicky infants, but its mechanism of action is not clear. The study aim was to examine urinary metabolomic fingerprint of colicky breastfed infants before and after 1 month of orally administered Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 or placebo.

Methods: This randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial was carried out with a well-documented probiotic. Thirty-two infants were enrolled, 16 in the probiotic group and 16 in the placebo group. Urine samples were collected from each subject before starting supplementation and at the end of the study period. Metabolomic profiles were obtained using a gas chromatography/mass spectrometry instrument. Subsequently, to compare groups before and after probiotic supplementation, univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were performed.

Results: In the L. reuteri treated group all metabolites for all class of nutrients (sugars, amino acids, carboxylic acids) resulted more abundant after the study period. The comparison with a control group (placebo treated), confirmed this effect on urines.

Conclusions: The metabolomic analysis of urine samples from infants treated with L. reuteri DSM 17938 allowed to detect some interesting features related to the effect of this treatment on urinary metabolome. To validate the results, a test on a larger cohort is required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用 DSM 17938 型纽特乳酸杆菌治疗肠绞痛婴儿的尿液代谢组:一项试点随机试验。
背景:纽崔莱乳杆菌(Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938)是唯一被推荐用于治疗肠绞痛婴儿的益生菌,但其作用机制尚不清楚。研究目的是检测肠绞痛母乳喂养婴儿在口服沙雷氏乳杆菌 DSM 17938 或安慰剂 1 个月前后的尿液代谢指纹图谱:这项随机、盲法、安慰剂对照临床试验使用的是一种经过充分证明的益生菌。32名婴儿参加了试验,其中益生菌组和安慰剂组各16名。在开始服用补充剂之前和研究结束时,收集了每个受试者的尿液样本。使用气相色谱/质谱仪获得代谢组谱。随后,为了比较补充益生菌前后的组别,进行了单变量和多变量统计分析:结果:研究期结束后,添加了纽崔莱益生菌的研究组中所有营养物质(糖、氨基酸、羧酸)的代谢物含量都有所增加。与对照组(安慰剂治疗组)的比较证实了尿液中的这种效应:通过对使用 L. reuteri DSM 17938 治疗的婴儿尿液样本进行代谢组学分析,可以发现一些与这种治疗对尿液代谢组的影响有关的有趣特征。要验证这些结果,还需要在更大的群体中进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva pediatrica
Minerva pediatrica PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Pediatrica publishes scientific papers on pediatrics, neonatology, adolescent medicine, child and adolescent psychiatry and pediatric surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
A qualitative study of pediatric nurses' perception of factors affecting negotiation of care in a Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Unit. The use of analgesics in pediatric patients with body injuries in pre-hospital conditions. Respiratory polygraphy in children with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective study. Evaluation of factors affecting total nucleated cells in umbilical cord blood collected for the Calabria Cord Blood Bank. Risk factors associated with wheezing in severe pediatric community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1