Sadhna Verma, Joseph Zegar, Connor Hoge, John McGready, Abhinav Sidana
{"title":"Multiparametric MRI-ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy in patients without prior diagnosis of prostate cancer: beyond centers of excellence.","authors":"Sadhna Verma, Joseph Zegar, Connor Hoge, John McGready, Abhinav Sidana","doi":"10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion prostate biopsy (FBx) has demonstrated increased accuracy for prostate cancer detection at designated centers of excellence. There is a concern if their results can be reproduced in smaller centers. Here, we evaluate the outcomes of FBx from a smaller academic center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients without a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer undergoing FBx from January 2014 to November 2019 was performed. Histopathological results were grouped into low-risk disease (Grade Group 1), intermediate-risk disease (Grade Group 2 and 3), and high-risk disease (Grade Group 4 or 5). Clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer was defined as Grade Group ≥ 2.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred and six men were included. Median age (IQR) and PSA (IQR) were 65.2 (60.3-70.2) years and 6.9 (5.2-9.7) ng/ml, respectively. There was no difference in overall cancer detection between FBx and SBx (53.6% vs 56.4% <i>p</i> = .1507). CS cancer detection was significantly higher with FBx (39.6% vs 35.3, <i>p</i> = .0275). FBx also outperformed SBx in diagnosing CS disease in patients with prior history of negative prostate biopsy (36.9% vs 27.9%, <i>p</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FBx detects a higher proportion of clinically significant disease and a lower proportion of clinically insignificant disease compared to SBx, in line with outcomes demonstrated by centers of excellence.</p>","PeriodicalId":55542,"journal":{"name":"Aging Male","volume":"23 5","pages":"1570-1575"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aging Male","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13685538.2021.1873263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-ultrasound (US) fusion prostate biopsy (FBx) has demonstrated increased accuracy for prostate cancer detection at designated centers of excellence. There is a concern if their results can be reproduced in smaller centers. Here, we evaluate the outcomes of FBx from a smaller academic center.
Methods: A retrospective review of patients without a prior diagnosis of prostate cancer undergoing FBx from January 2014 to November 2019 was performed. Histopathological results were grouped into low-risk disease (Grade Group 1), intermediate-risk disease (Grade Group 2 and 3), and high-risk disease (Grade Group 4 or 5). Clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer was defined as Grade Group ≥ 2.
Results: Five hundred and six men were included. Median age (IQR) and PSA (IQR) were 65.2 (60.3-70.2) years and 6.9 (5.2-9.7) ng/ml, respectively. There was no difference in overall cancer detection between FBx and SBx (53.6% vs 56.4% p = .1507). CS cancer detection was significantly higher with FBx (39.6% vs 35.3, p = .0275). FBx also outperformed SBx in diagnosing CS disease in patients with prior history of negative prostate biopsy (36.9% vs 27.9%, p < .001).
Conclusion: FBx detects a higher proportion of clinically significant disease and a lower proportion of clinically insignificant disease compared to SBx, in line with outcomes demonstrated by centers of excellence.
目的:在指定的卓越中心,多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)-超声(US)融合前列腺活检(FBx)已经证明了前列腺癌检测的准确性。人们担心他们的结果能否在较小的研究中心重现。在这里,我们从一个较小的学术中心评估FBx的结果。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2019年11月未确诊前列腺癌接受FBx治疗的患者。组织病理学结果分为低危(1级组)、中危(2、3级组)和高危(4、5级组)。临床显著(CS)前列腺癌定义为≥2级组。结果:共纳入56名男性。中位年龄(IQR)和PSA (IQR)分别为65.2(60.3 ~ 70.2)岁和6.9 (5.2 ~ 9.7)ng/ml。FBx和SBx的总体癌症检出率无差异(53.6% vs 56.4% p = .1507)。FBx组CS癌检出率显著高于FBx组(39.6% vs 35.3%, p = 0.0275)。对于既往有前列腺活检阴性病史的患者,FBx在诊断CS疾病方面也优于SBx (36.9% vs 27.9%, p结论:与SBx相比,FBx检测出临床显著疾病的比例更高,而临床不显著疾病的比例更低,这与卓越中心所证明的结果一致。
期刊介绍:
The Aging Male , the official journal of the International Society for the Study of the Aging Male, is a multidisciplinary publication covering all aspects of male health throughout the aging process. The Journal is a well-recognized and respected resource for anyone interested in keeping up to date with developments in this field. It is published quarterly in one volume per year.
The Journal publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material that provide researchers with an integrated perspective on this new, emerging specialty. Areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
Diagnosis and treatment of late-onset hypogonadism
Metabolic syndrome and related conditions
Treatment of erectile dysfunction and related disorders
Prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia.