Surgical Drain-Related Intestinal Obstruction After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Two Cases.

Q4 Medicine Journal of Endourology Case Reports Pub Date : 2020-12-29 eCollection Date: 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1089/cren.2020.0121
Yi-Wei Su, Li-Wen Chang, Jian-Ri Li, Kun-Yuan Chiu, Sheng-Chun Hung
{"title":"Surgical Drain-Related Intestinal Obstruction After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Two Cases.","authors":"Yi-Wei Su,&nbsp;Li-Wen Chang,&nbsp;Jian-Ri Li,&nbsp;Kun-Yuan Chiu,&nbsp;Sheng-Chun Hung","doi":"10.1089/cren.2020.0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Drainage tubes are almost always routinely used after a laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to prevent urinoma formation and lymphoceles. They are seldom of any consequence. We present our unique experience of bowel obstruction resulting from the use of pelvic drains. <b><i>Case Presentation:</i></b> We are reporting on two prostate cancer cases with rare postoperative complications. Each of them received robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and subsequently developed ileus and bowel obstruction. Series follow-up images suggested the bowel obstruction was related to their drainage tube. No evidence of urine leakage or intestine perforation was found based on drainage fluid analysis. We performed exploratory laparotomy in the first patient and found drainage tube kinking with the terminal ileum and adhesion band. The drainage tube was removed and patient recovery occurred over the following days. In the second case, the patient experienced bowel obstruction for 4 days after surgery. Based on our experience in the first case, and a drainage fluid survey showing no evidence of urine leakage, we removed the drainage tube on the morning of the 4th day, giving the patient a dramatic recovery with flatus and stool passage occurring in the afternoon. Both of the patients recovered well in hospital and during regular follow-up. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> To best of our knowledge, despite there being certain case reports regarding drainage tube ileus in colorectal and bowel surgery, we have reported here on the first two cases of small bowel obstruction as a complication arising from the abdominal drainage tube used in robot-assisted urology surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":36779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","volume":"6 4","pages":"343-347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7803201/pdf/cren.2020.0121.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endourology Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/cren.2020.0121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Drainage tubes are almost always routinely used after a laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy to prevent urinoma formation and lymphoceles. They are seldom of any consequence. We present our unique experience of bowel obstruction resulting from the use of pelvic drains. Case Presentation: We are reporting on two prostate cancer cases with rare postoperative complications. Each of them received robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and subsequently developed ileus and bowel obstruction. Series follow-up images suggested the bowel obstruction was related to their drainage tube. No evidence of urine leakage or intestine perforation was found based on drainage fluid analysis. We performed exploratory laparotomy in the first patient and found drainage tube kinking with the terminal ileum and adhesion band. The drainage tube was removed and patient recovery occurred over the following days. In the second case, the patient experienced bowel obstruction for 4 days after surgery. Based on our experience in the first case, and a drainage fluid survey showing no evidence of urine leakage, we removed the drainage tube on the morning of the 4th day, giving the patient a dramatic recovery with flatus and stool passage occurring in the afternoon. Both of the patients recovered well in hospital and during regular follow-up. Conclusion: To best of our knowledge, despite there being certain case reports regarding drainage tube ileus in colorectal and bowel surgery, we have reported here on the first two cases of small bowel obstruction as a complication arising from the abdominal drainage tube used in robot-assisted urology surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后引流相关肠梗阻2例分析。
背景:在腹腔镜或机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和盆腔淋巴结切除术后,引流管几乎总是常规使用,以防止尿瘤和淋巴囊肿的形成。他们很少有什么影响。我们提出我们独特的经验,肠梗阻导致使用盆腔引流。病例介绍:我们报告两例前列腺癌的罕见术后并发症。每个患者都接受了机器人辅助的腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术和双侧盆腔淋巴结清扫,随后发生肠梗阻和肠梗阻。一系列随访图像提示肠梗阻与引流管有关。引流液分析未发现尿漏或肠穿孔的证据。我们对第一位患者进行剖腹探查,发现引流管与回肠末端扭结,粘连带。引流管被拔除,患者在接下来的几天内恢复。第二例患者术后出现肠梗阻4天。根据我们在第一例病例中的经验,以及引流液调查显示没有尿漏的证据,我们在第4天的早上拔掉了引流管,使患者迅速恢复,并在下午出现了放屁和大便。在医院和定期随访期间,两例患者均恢复良好。结论:据我们所知,尽管在结直肠和肠道手术中有一些关于引流管肠梗阻的病例报道,但我们在这里报道了前两例由于机器人辅助泌尿外科手术中使用腹部引流管而引起的小肠梗阻并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Rare Complication of Amplatz Sheath: Amplatz Sheath Rupture During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Patient's Fear of Being Infected, Another Complication of COVID-19 Outbreak: A Lesson Learned from a Case of Life-Threatening Urolithiasis. Inflammatory Pseudotumor of the Renal Pelvis. Endoscopic Management of Chyluria Caused by Pyelolymphatic Fistula After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty. Ureteroiliac Fistula: Bleeding of Unknown Origin-Case Report and Review of the Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1