Internalization of Behavior Management Skills among Teachers in a Specialized School Serving Students with Neurodevelopmental Disorders.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Behavior Modification Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-23 DOI:10.1177/01454455211010708
Kathleen L Ramsey, Stephanie D Smith, Laura K Hansen, Richard S Mohn, Fayth C Walbridge, Kimberly G Barajas, Brandi M Ellis, Brad A Dufrene
{"title":"Internalization of Behavior Management Skills among Teachers in a Specialized School Serving Students with Neurodevelopmental Disorders.","authors":"Kathleen L Ramsey,&nbsp;Stephanie D Smith,&nbsp;Laura K Hansen,&nbsp;Richard S Mohn,&nbsp;Fayth C Walbridge,&nbsp;Kimberly G Barajas,&nbsp;Brandi M Ellis,&nbsp;Brad A Dufrene","doi":"10.1177/01454455211010708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior studies suggest that the fidelity of teachers' implementation of behavior management practices in the classroom diminish over time. Establishing how long it takes teachers to fully learn and sustain their independent use of these skills may aid in addressing implementation drift. The primary goals of this pilot study were twofold: (1) determine how long it takes teachers employed at a school serving students with Neurodevelopmental Disorders to internalize evidence-based behavior management practices (i.e., positive reinforcement, direct commands), and (2) establish whether some skills take longer than others for teachers to internalize. We also had the opportunity to evaluate whether a pre-determined threshold of skill internalization (e.g., 50% increase in skill use for three consecutive weeks) as defined in the extant literature translates into sustained skill implementation. Our results suggest that the length of standard teacher trainings may not be adequate given upwards of 2 months is required for the internalization of one skill and the time needed to reach internalization is dependent upon the skill taught and may deviate by at least 2 weeks across skills. However, given the variability observed in teachers' implementation of skills following internalization, this pre-determined threshold of skill internalization may be insufficient and requires further examination in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48037,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Modification","volume":"46 4","pages":"863-893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/01454455211010708","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Modification","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01454455211010708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Prior studies suggest that the fidelity of teachers' implementation of behavior management practices in the classroom diminish over time. Establishing how long it takes teachers to fully learn and sustain their independent use of these skills may aid in addressing implementation drift. The primary goals of this pilot study were twofold: (1) determine how long it takes teachers employed at a school serving students with Neurodevelopmental Disorders to internalize evidence-based behavior management practices (i.e., positive reinforcement, direct commands), and (2) establish whether some skills take longer than others for teachers to internalize. We also had the opportunity to evaluate whether a pre-determined threshold of skill internalization (e.g., 50% increase in skill use for three consecutive weeks) as defined in the extant literature translates into sustained skill implementation. Our results suggest that the length of standard teacher trainings may not be adequate given upwards of 2 months is required for the internalization of one skill and the time needed to reach internalization is dependent upon the skill taught and may deviate by at least 2 weeks across skills. However, given the variability observed in teachers' implementation of skills following internalization, this pre-determined threshold of skill internalization may be insufficient and requires further examination in future studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
某神经发育障碍专科学校教师行为管理技能内化的研究。
先前的研究表明,教师在课堂上实施行为管理实践的忠诚度随着时间的推移而降低。确定教师充分学习和保持独立使用这些技能所需的时间,可能有助于解决实施偏差问题。本初步研究的主要目标有两个:(1)确定为神经发育障碍学生服务的学校的教师需要多长时间才能内化基于证据的行为管理实践(即,积极强化,直接命令),(2)确定教师是否需要更长的时间才能内化某些技能。我们也有机会评估现有文献中定义的预先确定的技能内化阈值(例如,连续三周增加50%的技能使用)是否转化为持续的技能实施。我们的研究结果表明,标准教师培训的长度可能不够,因为一项技能的内化需要2个月以上,而达到内化所需的时间取决于所教授的技能,并且可能至少相差2周。然而,鉴于教师内化后技能实施的可变性,这种预先确定的技能内化阈值可能是不够的,需要在未来的研究中进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavior Modification
Behavior Modification PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: For two decades, researchers and practitioners have turned to Behavior Modification for current scholarship on applied behavior modification. Starting in 1995, in addition to keeping you informed on assessment and modification techniques relevant to psychiatric, clinical, education, and rehabilitation settings, Behavior Modification revised and expanded its focus to include treatment manuals and program descriptions. With these features you can follow the process of clinical research and see how it can be applied to your own work. And, with Behavior Modification, successful clinical and administrative experts have an outlet for sharing their solutions in the field.
期刊最新文献
Applying Techniques From Precision Medicine to Predict Challenging Behavior and Inform Clinical Resource Allocation. A Systematic Review of Pyramidal Training for Implementing Behavioral Interventions. Response Blocking to Identify Inappropriate Self-Feeding as a Motivation or a Skill Deficit. Cognitive Remediation to Facilitate Independent Living in Persons With Serious Mental Illness. A Quantitative Systematic Literature Review of Combination Punishment Literature: Progress Over the Last Decade.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1