Hereditary angioedema patients would prefer newer-generation oral prophylaxis.

Daniela Geba, Johan Mohd Sani, Michaela Gascon, Rebecca Hahn, Kavita Aggarwal, Jinky Rosselli
{"title":"Hereditary angioedema patients would prefer newer-generation oral prophylaxis.","authors":"Daniela Geba,&nbsp;Johan Mohd Sani,&nbsp;Michaela Gascon,&nbsp;Rebecca Hahn,&nbsp;Kavita Aggarwal,&nbsp;Jinky Rosselli","doi":"10.1080/21556660.2020.1863699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore treatment preferences of patients with Hereditary Angioedema (HAE), a debilitating disorder characterized by potentially life-threatening, recurrent episodes of swelling, resulting in significant physical, emotional, and economic burden. With newer oral prophylactic treatments on the horizon, it is important to understand patients' preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted in 2018 among United States (US) adult patients diagnosed with Type I or II HAE. Respondents were recruited anonymously from online panels and social media.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Online surveys were completed by 75 patients diagnosed with HAE by a healthcare provider, with a mean of 16.7 years since diagnosis. Most patients (64%) report taking at least one medication for prophylaxis of HAE attacks. While almost all patients surveyed agree it is important to take preventative medication as prescribed, over half (52%) of patients report HAE prophylactic treatment to be burdensome. Despite stating that they like their current medications, 98% of the prophylactic HAE medication users would prefer an oral treatment if available; almost all (96%) prophylaxis users agree that oral preventative medication would fit their life better than an injectable medication, with 67% of users citing convenience as the primary reason to try an oral preventative HAE medication. If a more convenient option were available, nearly all (96%) patients currently not treating their HAE prophylactically would feel encouraged to do so.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with HAE would prefer a newer generation oral prophylactic medication that would decrease treatment burden and allow them to live fuller lives.</p>","PeriodicalId":15631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drug Assessment","volume":"10 1","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21556660.2020.1863699","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drug Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21556660.2020.1863699","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Objective: To explore treatment preferences of patients with Hereditary Angioedema (HAE), a debilitating disorder characterized by potentially life-threatening, recurrent episodes of swelling, resulting in significant physical, emotional, and economic burden. With newer oral prophylactic treatments on the horizon, it is important to understand patients' preferences.

Methods: An online survey was conducted in 2018 among United States (US) adult patients diagnosed with Type I or II HAE. Respondents were recruited anonymously from online panels and social media.

Results: Online surveys were completed by 75 patients diagnosed with HAE by a healthcare provider, with a mean of 16.7 years since diagnosis. Most patients (64%) report taking at least one medication for prophylaxis of HAE attacks. While almost all patients surveyed agree it is important to take preventative medication as prescribed, over half (52%) of patients report HAE prophylactic treatment to be burdensome. Despite stating that they like their current medications, 98% of the prophylactic HAE medication users would prefer an oral treatment if available; almost all (96%) prophylaxis users agree that oral preventative medication would fit their life better than an injectable medication, with 67% of users citing convenience as the primary reason to try an oral preventative HAE medication. If a more convenient option were available, nearly all (96%) patients currently not treating their HAE prophylactically would feel encouraged to do so.

Conclusions: Most patients with HAE would prefer a newer generation oral prophylactic medication that would decrease treatment burden and allow them to live fuller lives.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传性血管性水肿患者更倾向于新一代的口服预防药物。
目的:探讨遗传性血管性水肿(HAE)患者的治疗选择。遗传性血管性水肿是一种衰弱性疾病,其特征是可能危及生命,反复发作的肿胀,造成严重的身体、情绪和经济负担。随着新的口服预防性治疗方法的出现,了解患者的偏好是很重要的。方法:2018年在美国(US)诊断为I型或II型HAE的成年患者中进行了一项在线调查。受访者是从在线小组和社交媒体上匿名招募的。结果:75名被医疗服务提供者诊断为HAE的患者完成了在线调查,平均诊断时间为16.7年。大多数患者(64%)报告至少服用一种药物来预防HAE发作。虽然几乎所有接受调查的患者都同意按照处方服用预防性药物很重要,但超过一半(52%)的患者报告HAE预防性治疗负担沉重。尽管表示他们喜欢目前的药物,但98%的预防性HAE药物使用者在可用的情况下更倾向于口服治疗;几乎所有(96%)预防药物使用者都认为口服预防药物比注射药物更适合他们的生活,67%的使用者认为方便是尝试口服HAE预防药物的主要原因。如果有一个更方便的选择,几乎所有(96%)目前没有预防性治疗HAE的患者都会感到被鼓励这样做。结论:大多数HAE患者更倾向于新一代口服预防性药物,这将减轻治疗负担,并使他们过上更充实的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Drug Assessment
Journal of Drug Assessment PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Treatment and comorbidity burden among people living with HIV: a review of systematic literature reviews. Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses. Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea. A review of the risks of long-term consequences associated with components of the CHOP chemotherapy regimen. Real-world experience of ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis in an Arab population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1