Association of maternal blood lead concentration with the risk of small for gestational age: A dose-response meta-analysis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-01-25 DOI:10.1080/19338244.2021.1874857
Ahmad Habibian Sezavar, Bahman Pourhassan, Nader Rahimi Kakavandi, Mohammad Reza Hooshangi Shayeste, Morteza Abyadeh
{"title":"Association of maternal blood lead concentration with the risk of small for gestational age: A dose-response meta-analysis.","authors":"Ahmad Habibian Sezavar,&nbsp;Bahman Pourhassan,&nbsp;Nader Rahimi Kakavandi,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Hooshangi Shayeste,&nbsp;Morteza Abyadeh","doi":"10.1080/19338244.2021.1874857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In spite of growing evidence for the negative effect of lead, knowledge about the dose-response relationship of maternal blood lead level (BLL) and the risk of small for gestational age (SGA) is limited. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the dose-response relation between maternal BLL and the risk of SGA. A systematic search through Embase and PubMed was performed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The nonlinear and linear relationships between maternal BLL and the risk of SGA were also investigated. Results from 51,065 patients showed a significant association between maternal BLL and risk of SGA in highest versus lowest analysis (OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.12-2.10, <i>p</i> = 0.007). While there was no association in linear dose-response (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.04, <i>p</i> = 0.021) meta-analysis, a direct relationship was observed in the nonlinear model (nonlinearity <i>p</i> < 0.001). Results of this dose-response meta-analysis showed that maternal BLL higher than ∼ 0.3 µg/dL is directly associated with the risk of SGA.</p>","PeriodicalId":8173,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health","volume":"77 4","pages":"293-300"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/19338244.2021.1874857","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2021.1874857","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In spite of growing evidence for the negative effect of lead, knowledge about the dose-response relationship of maternal blood lead level (BLL) and the risk of small for gestational age (SGA) is limited. We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the dose-response relation between maternal BLL and the risk of SGA. A systematic search through Embase and PubMed was performed. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. The nonlinear and linear relationships between maternal BLL and the risk of SGA were also investigated. Results from 51,065 patients showed a significant association between maternal BLL and risk of SGA in highest versus lowest analysis (OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.12-2.10, p = 0.007). While there was no association in linear dose-response (OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00-1.04, p = 0.021) meta-analysis, a direct relationship was observed in the nonlinear model (nonlinearity p < 0.001). Results of this dose-response meta-analysis showed that maternal BLL higher than ∼ 0.3 µg/dL is directly associated with the risk of SGA.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
母亲血铅浓度与胎龄小风险的关系:一项剂量-反应荟萃分析。
尽管越来越多的证据表明铅的负面影响,关于母亲血铅水平(BLL)和小胎龄(SGA)风险的剂量-反应关系的知识是有限的。我们进行了这项荟萃分析,以评估产妇BLL与SGA风险之间的剂量-反应关系。通过Embase和PubMed进行了系统的搜索。计算优势比(ORs)和95%置信区间(95% CI)。本文还探讨了产妇身体质量与SGA风险之间的非线性和线性关系。51,065例患者的结果显示,在最高和最低分析中,母体BLL与SGA风险之间存在显著关联(OR: 1.54;95% CI: 1.12-2.10, p = 0.007)。而线性剂量反应无相关性(OR: 1.02;95% CI: 1.00-1.04, p = 0.021),在非线性模型中观察到直接关系(非线性p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health
Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Environmental & Occupational Health , originally founded in 1919 as the Journal of Industrial Hygiene, and perhaps most well-known as the Archives of Environmental Health, reports, integrates, and consolidates the latest research, both nationally and internationally, from fields germane to environmental health, including epidemiology, toxicology, exposure assessment, modeling and biostatistics, risk science and biochemistry. Publishing new research based on the most rigorous methods and discussion to put this work in perspective for public health, public policy, and sustainability, the Archives addresses such topics of current concern as health significance of chemical exposure, toxic waste, new and old energy technologies, industrial processes, and the environmental causation of disease such as neurotoxicity, birth defects, cancer, and chronic degenerative diseases. For more than 90 years, this noted journal has provided objective documentation of the effects of environmental agents on human and, in some cases, animal populations and information of practical importance on which decisions are based.
期刊最新文献
A study on the relationship between job-stress and burnout: Focusing on job domain among medical technologists in South Korea A prospective study of health-related lifestyle changes among police cadets. Occupational well-being in medical workers in Inner Mongolia after the Normalized Epidemic Prevention and Control Strategy: A cross-sectional study Prolonged cough and dyspnea following a single episode of intense silica exposure Heavy metal worker’s pneumonoconiosis with lung parenchymal damage and Peripheral neuropathy: case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1