Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction.

Sreenivasulu Metikala, Binu T Kurian, Sanjeev S Madan, James A Fernandes
{"title":"Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction.","authors":"Sreenivasulu Metikala,&nbsp;Binu T Kurian,&nbsp;Sanjeev S Madan,&nbsp;James A Fernandes","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1459","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>Ilizarov hip reconstruction (IHR) is a traditional method of salvaging chronic adolescent problem hips but faces practical problems from external fixators leading to reduced compliance. We present the same reconstruction utilising only internal devices with a modification in technique and aim to review early results.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated eight patients between 2014 and 2017 with chronic painful hips treated by a two-stage reconstruction; stage 1 included femoral head resection and pelvic support osteotomy using double plating, while stage 2 comprised distal femoral osteotomy avoiding varus followed by insertion of retrograde magnetic nail for postoperative lengthening. Patients continued physiotherapy postoperatively while protecting from early weight-bearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At mean follow-up of 19 months (range 6-36), all osteotomies healed with bone healing index of 47 days/cm (range 30-72). Pain improved from 8.3 (range 7-9) to 2 (range 0-6), while limb length discrepancy got corrected from 4.3 cm (range 3-5) to 1.4 cm (range 0-2.5) at final follow-up. Trendelenburg sign was eliminated in three and delayed in five. No examples of infection or permanent knee stiffness were noted. One patient had plates breakage due to mechanical fall and one had 35 mm of lateral mechanical axis deviation requiring corrective osteotomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pelvic support hip reconstruction with exclusive internal devices is a technique in evolution with encouraging early results. It avoids common complications of external fixators and facilitates quick rehabilitation of joints. Refraining from distal varus can effectively eliminate Trendelenburg gait, albeit with some degree of lateral mechanical axis deviation. Unlike external fixation where there is a possibility of gradual correction, this staged procedure of internal fixation is technically demanding with a learning curve.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Pelvic support hip reconstruction performed by internal implants is a viable alternative to IHR with potential benefits.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Metikala S, Kurian BT, Madan SS, <i>et al.</i> Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(2):91-97.</p>","PeriodicalId":21979,"journal":{"name":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","volume":"15 2","pages":"91-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b2/7b/stlr-15-91.PMC7801897.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1459","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim and objective: Ilizarov hip reconstruction (IHR) is a traditional method of salvaging chronic adolescent problem hips but faces practical problems from external fixators leading to reduced compliance. We present the same reconstruction utilising only internal devices with a modification in technique and aim to review early results.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated eight patients between 2014 and 2017 with chronic painful hips treated by a two-stage reconstruction; stage 1 included femoral head resection and pelvic support osteotomy using double plating, while stage 2 comprised distal femoral osteotomy avoiding varus followed by insertion of retrograde magnetic nail for postoperative lengthening. Patients continued physiotherapy postoperatively while protecting from early weight-bearing.

Results: At mean follow-up of 19 months (range 6-36), all osteotomies healed with bone healing index of 47 days/cm (range 30-72). Pain improved from 8.3 (range 7-9) to 2 (range 0-6), while limb length discrepancy got corrected from 4.3 cm (range 3-5) to 1.4 cm (range 0-2.5) at final follow-up. Trendelenburg sign was eliminated in three and delayed in five. No examples of infection or permanent knee stiffness were noted. One patient had plates breakage due to mechanical fall and one had 35 mm of lateral mechanical axis deviation requiring corrective osteotomy.

Conclusion: Pelvic support hip reconstruction with exclusive internal devices is a technique in evolution with encouraging early results. It avoids common complications of external fixators and facilitates quick rehabilitation of joints. Refraining from distal varus can effectively eliminate Trendelenburg gait, albeit with some degree of lateral mechanical axis deviation. Unlike external fixation where there is a possibility of gradual correction, this staged procedure of internal fixation is technically demanding with a learning curve.

Clinical significance: Pelvic support hip reconstruction performed by internal implants is a viable alternative to IHR with potential benefits.

How to cite this article: Metikala S, Kurian BT, Madan SS, et al. Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(2):91-97.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盆腔支持髋关节重建与内部装置:替代Ilizarov髋关节重建。
目的与目的:Ilizarov髋关节重建术(IHR)是修复青少年慢性髋关节问题的传统方法,但面临外固定架导致依从性降低的实际问题。我们提出了相同的重建仅利用内部装置与技术的修改,目的是回顾早期的结果。材料和方法:我们回顾性评估了2014年至2017年间8例接受两期髋关节重建治疗的慢性髋关节疼痛患者;第1期包括股骨头切除和骨盆支撑截骨双钢板,第2期包括股骨远端截骨避免内翻,然后插入逆行磁钉进行术后延长。患者术后继续进行物理治疗,同时避免早期负重。结果:平均随访19个月(范围6 ~ 36),所有截骨手术均愈合,骨愈合指数为47天/厘米(范围30 ~ 72)。疼痛从8.3(范围7-9)改善到2(范围0-6),而肢体长度差异在最终随访时从4.3 cm(范围3-5)纠正到1.4 cm(范围0-2.5)。Trendelenburg标志三次被淘汰,五次被推迟。没有感染或永久性膝关节僵硬的例子。一名患者因机械坠落导致钢板断裂,一名患者有35mm的侧机械轴偏差,需要进行矫正截骨。结论:盆腔支持髋关节置换术是一项发展中的技术,早期结果令人鼓舞。它避免了外固定架常见的并发症,有助于关节的快速康复。抑制远端内翻可以有效消除Trendelenburg步态,尽管有一定程度的侧机械轴偏差。与有可能逐渐矫正的外固定不同,这种分阶段的内固定手术在技术上要求很高,需要学习。临床意义:采用内植入物进行骨盆支持髋关节重建是一种可行的替代IHR的方法,具有潜在的益处。文章引用方式:Metikala S, Kurian BT, Madan SS等。盆腔支持髋关节重建与内部装置:替代Ilizarov髋关节重建。创伤肢体重建2020;15(2):91-97。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction
Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Strategies in Trauma and Limb Reconstruction is dedicated to surgeons, allied medical professionals and researchers in the field of orthopaedics and trauma. The scope of the journal is to discuss the fields of skeletal injury, and the complications thereof, congenital and acquired limb deformities and deficiencies, and orthopaedic-related infection, together with their surgical and non-surgical treatments. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, case reports, descriptions of new or recognised treatment techniques, forum discussions of clinical scenarios and relevant correspondence. It aims to provide a widely accessible source of useful information to practitioners in the field through the problem- or technique-based approach of published articles.
期刊最新文献
A Modified Surgical Approach to the Distal Humerus: The Triceps Bundle Technique. Application of the Modified RUST Score in Tibial Bone Transport and Factors Associated with Docking Site Complications. Consent in Limb Lengthening Surgery: Predicting the True Incidence of Material Risk. Do Post-debridement Cultures have a Role in Reduction of Infection in Open Fractures? Report of 166 Cases and Literature Review. Massive Tibial Defect Treated with Plate-assisted Bone Segment Transport and A Novel Internal Cable-Pulley System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1