Comparative pharmacokinetics between tenofovir disoproxil phosphate and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy subjects.

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-22 DOI:10.12793/tcp.2021.29.e4
Sangmi Lee, Eunwoo Kim, Seol Ju Moon, Jina Jung, SeungHwan Lee, Kyung-Sang Yu
{"title":"Comparative pharmacokinetics between tenofovir disoproxil phosphate and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy subjects.","authors":"Sangmi Lee,&nbsp;Eunwoo Kim,&nbsp;Seol Ju Moon,&nbsp;Jina Jung,&nbsp;SeungHwan Lee,&nbsp;Kyung-Sang Yu","doi":"10.12793/tcp.2021.29.e4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tenofovir is the representative treatment for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus infection. This study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety characteristics after a single administration of tenofovir disoproxil phosphate compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy male subjects. An open-label, randomized, single administration, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted in 37 healthy volunteers. Serial blood samples were collected up to 72 hours. Non-compartmental analysis was used to calculate the PK parameters. The 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) were calculated for comparing tenofovir disoproxil phosphate to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Safety assessments were performed including clinical laboratory tests, adverse events, etc. during the study. The GMR and 90% CIs were 1.0514 (0.9527-1.1603) for C<sub>max</sub> and 1.0375 (0.9516-1.1311) for AUC<sub>last</sub>, respectively, and both fell within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.8-1.25. Both tenofovir salt forms were tolerable. This study demonstrated that tenofovir disoproxil phosphate (292 mg) was bioequivalent to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg).</p>","PeriodicalId":23288,"journal":{"name":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/35/0e/tcp-29-45.PMC8020360.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational and Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2021.29.e4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Tenofovir is the representative treatment for human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus infection. This study was conducted to assess the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and safety characteristics after a single administration of tenofovir disoproxil phosphate compared to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy male subjects. An open-label, randomized, single administration, two-treatment, two-sequence crossover study was conducted in 37 healthy volunteers. Serial blood samples were collected up to 72 hours. Non-compartmental analysis was used to calculate the PK parameters. The 90% confidence intervals (90% CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) were calculated for comparing tenofovir disoproxil phosphate to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Safety assessments were performed including clinical laboratory tests, adverse events, etc. during the study. The GMR and 90% CIs were 1.0514 (0.9527-1.1603) for Cmax and 1.0375 (0.9516-1.1311) for AUClast, respectively, and both fell within the conventional bioequivalence range of 0.8-1.25. Both tenofovir salt forms were tolerable. This study demonstrated that tenofovir disoproxil phosphate (292 mg) was bioequivalent to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磷酸替诺福韦二氧吡酯与富马酸替诺福韦二氧吡酯在健康受试者体内的比较药代动力学。
替诺福韦是治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒和乙型肝炎病毒感染的代表性药物。本研究旨在评估健康男性受试者单次给予磷酸替诺福韦二氧吡酯与富马酸替诺福韦二氧吡酯后的药代动力学(PKs)和安全性。在37名健康志愿者中进行了一项开放标签、随机、单给药、双治疗、双序列交叉研究。连续采集了72小时的血液样本。采用非区室分析计算PK参数。计算了磷酸替诺福韦二氧proxil和富马酸替诺福韦二氧proxil的几何平均比(GMR)的90%置信区间(90% ci)。安全性评估包括临床实验室检查、研究期间的不良事件等。Cmax和AUClast的GMR和90% ci分别为1.0514(0.9527 ~ 1.1603)和1.0375(0.9516 ~ 1.1311),均在0.8 ~ 1.25的常规生物等效性范围内。两种盐形式的替诺福韦都是耐受的。该研究表明磷酸替诺福韦二氧proxil (292mg)与富马酸替诺福韦二氧proxil (300mg)具有生物等效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology
Translational and Clinical Pharmacology Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Translational and Clinical Pharmacology (Transl Clin Pharmacol, TCP) is the official journal of the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (KSCPT). TCP is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the dissemination of knowledge relating to all aspects of translational and clinical pharmacology. The categories for publication include pharmacokinetics (PK) and drug disposition, drug metabolism, pharmacodynamics (PD), clinical trials and design issues, pharmacogenomics and pharmacogenetics, pharmacometrics, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacovigilence, and human pharmacology. Studies involving animal models, pharmacological characterization, and clinical trials are appropriate for consideration.
期刊最新文献
Development of in-silico drug cardiac toxicity evaluation system with consideration of inter-individual variability. Enhancing drug administration flexibility: evaluation of pharmacokinetic properties of tegoprazan orally disintegrating tablet (ODT) administered via nasogastric tube or oral dosing. Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of candesartan cilexetil tablet in Chinese volunteers under fasting condition: an open-label, randomized-sequence, 2-period crossover study. Data science through natural language with ChatGPT's Code Interpreter. Emerging and upcoming therapies in insomnia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1