Using Quantitative D-Dimer to Determine the Need for Pulmonary CT Angiography in COVID-19 Patients.

Gary Mikhjian, Ahmad Elghoroury, Keith Cronovich, Kevin Brody, Robert Jarski
{"title":"Using Quantitative D-Dimer to Determine the Need for Pulmonary CT Angiography in COVID-19 Patients.","authors":"Gary Mikhjian, Ahmad Elghoroury, Keith Cronovich, Kevin Brody, Robert Jarski","doi":"10.51894/001c.18652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>COVID-19 has been frequently cited as a condition causing a pro-inflammatory state leading to hypercoagulopathy and increased risk for venous thromboembolism. This condition has thus prompted prior studies and screening models that utilize D-dimer for pulmonary embolism (PE) into question. The limited research to date has failed to provide tools or guidance regarding what COVID-19 positive patients should receive pulmonary CT angiography screening. This knowledge gap has led to missed diagnoses, CT overutilization, and increased morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the quantitative D-dimer lab marker in a convenience sample of 426 COVID-19 positive patients to assist providers in determining the utility of pulmonary CT angiography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a retrospective analysis on all COVID-19 positive patients within the Henry Ford Medical System between March 1st, 2020 through April 30th, 2020 who received pulmonary CT angiography and had a quantitative D-dimer lab drawn within 24 hours of CT imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our sampling criteria yielded a total of n = 426 patients, of whom 347 (81.5%) were negative for PE and 79 (18.5%) were positive for PE. The average D-dimer in the negative PE group was 2.95 μg./mL. (SD 4.26), significantly different than the 9.15 μg./mL. (SD 6.80) positive PE group (P < 0.05; 95% CI -7.8, -4.6). Theoretically, applying the traditional ≤ 0.5 μg./mL. D-dimer cut-off to our data would yield a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 7.49% for exclusion of PE. Based on these results, the authors would be able to increase the D-dimer threshold to < 0.89 μg./mL. to maintain their sensitivity to 100% and raise the specificity to 27.95%. Observing a D-dimer cut-off value of ≤ 1.28 μg./mL. would reduce sensitivity to 97.47% but increase the specificity to 57.93%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These study results support the utilization of alternative D-dimer thresholds to exclude PE in COVID-19 patients. Based on these findings, providers may be able to observe increased D-dimer cut-off values to reduce unnecessary pulmonary CT angiography scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":74853,"journal":{"name":"Spartan medical research journal","volume":"6 1","pages":"18652"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8043904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spartan medical research journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51894/001c.18652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 has been frequently cited as a condition causing a pro-inflammatory state leading to hypercoagulopathy and increased risk for venous thromboembolism. This condition has thus prompted prior studies and screening models that utilize D-dimer for pulmonary embolism (PE) into question. The limited research to date has failed to provide tools or guidance regarding what COVID-19 positive patients should receive pulmonary CT angiography screening. This knowledge gap has led to missed diagnoses, CT overutilization, and increased morbidity and mortality.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the utility of the quantitative D-dimer lab marker in a convenience sample of 426 COVID-19 positive patients to assist providers in determining the utility of pulmonary CT angiography.

Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis on all COVID-19 positive patients within the Henry Ford Medical System between March 1st, 2020 through April 30th, 2020 who received pulmonary CT angiography and had a quantitative D-dimer lab drawn within 24 hours of CT imaging.

Results: Our sampling criteria yielded a total of n = 426 patients, of whom 347 (81.5%) were negative for PE and 79 (18.5%) were positive for PE. The average D-dimer in the negative PE group was 2.95 μg./mL. (SD 4.26), significantly different than the 9.15 μg./mL. (SD 6.80) positive PE group (P < 0.05; 95% CI -7.8, -4.6). Theoretically, applying the traditional ≤ 0.5 μg./mL. D-dimer cut-off to our data would yield a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 7.49% for exclusion of PE. Based on these results, the authors would be able to increase the D-dimer threshold to < 0.89 μg./mL. to maintain their sensitivity to 100% and raise the specificity to 27.95%. Observing a D-dimer cut-off value of ≤ 1.28 μg./mL. would reduce sensitivity to 97.47% but increase the specificity to 57.93%.

Conclusions: These study results support the utilization of alternative D-dimer thresholds to exclude PE in COVID-19 patients. Based on these findings, providers may be able to observe increased D-dimer cut-off values to reduce unnecessary pulmonary CT angiography scans.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用定量 D-Dimer 确定 COVID-19 患者是否需要进行肺部 CT 血管造影。
导言:COVID-19 经常被认为是一种导致高凝状态和静脉血栓栓塞风险增加的促炎症状态。因此,该病症引发了人们对之前利用 D-二聚体检测肺栓塞(PE)的研究和筛查模型的质疑。迄今为止,有限的研究未能就哪些 COVID-19 阳性患者应接受肺 CT 血管造影筛查提供工具或指导。这一知识空白导致了漏诊、CT 过度使用以及发病率和死亡率的增加:本研究旨在对 426 例 COVID-19 阳性患者的便利样本进行定量 D-二聚体实验室标记物的实用性研究,以帮助医疗服务提供者确定肺 CT 血管造影术的实用性:作者对2020年3月1日至2020年4月30日期间亨利福特医疗系统内所有COVID-19阳性患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受了肺部CT血管造影术,并在CT成像后24小时内抽取了定量D-二聚体实验室指标:根据我们的抽样标准,共有 n = 426 名患者,其中 347 人(81.5%)为 PE 阴性,79 人(18.5%)为 PE 阳性。PE 阴性组的 D-二聚体平均值为 2.95 μg./mL.(SD 4.26),与 PE 阳性组的 9.15 μg./mL.(SD 6.80) 的 PE 阳性组有明显差异(P < 0.05; 95% CI -7.8, -4.6)。从理论上讲,将传统的 ≤ 0.5 μg./mL.理论上,将传统的≤ 0.5 μg./mL的D-二聚体临界值应用于我们的数据时,排除PE的敏感性为100%,特异性为7.49%。根据这些结果,作者可以将D-二聚体临界值提高到< 0.89 μg./mL.,以保持100%的灵敏度,并将特异性提高到27.95%。观察 D-二聚体临界值≤ 1.28 μg./mL.将使灵敏度降至 97.47%,但特异性增至 57.93%:这些研究结果支持使用其他 D-二聚体阈值来排除 COVID-19 患者的 PE。根据这些研究结果,医疗服务提供者可以提高 D-二聚体临界值,以减少不必要的肺部 CT 血管造影扫描。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving the Diagnostic Workup of Vertigo: A Multidisciplinary Review. Functional Outcome of Uncemented (Hydroxyapatite Coated) Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in Fracture Neck of Femur in Elderly. Comparing Clinical Treatments and Outcomes of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Osteopathic Otolaryngology Residency Match Trends: Impact of the ACGME Single Accreditation System (2010-2024). Descriptive Characteristics of Undergraduate Research Associate Programs in the United States: Findings from a National Registry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1