Migrants as suspects? A participatory consensus conference to promote well-being and inclusion.

IF 0.9 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2021-05-06 DOI:10.1080/10852352.2021.1918614
Patrizia Meringolo, Cristina Cecchini, Camillo Donati
{"title":"Migrants as suspects? A participatory consensus conference to promote well-being and inclusion.","authors":"Patrizia Meringolo,&nbsp;Cristina Cecchini,&nbsp;Camillo Donati","doi":"10.1080/10852352.2021.1918614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One consequence of the securitarian approach against terrorism is the conflictual request both to \"spot radicals\" and build social cohesion in local communities. As a result, migrants' communities feel discriminated and treated as a \"suspect community\". The European Project PROVA addressed the prevention of violent radicalization in youth, involving professionals and representatives of local communities, and producing Guidelines in order to contrast the marginalization of suspected communities. The empirical research refers to an innovative way to carry out the Participatory Consensus Conference (PCC), used to define Guidelines aimed at identifying suitable recommendations, costs and benefits for the foreseen policies. Participants were 12 stakeholders (Local Authorities, Juvenile Justice System, NGOs, and Educational Institutions). Methods: the PCC used a scientific process for achieving an agreement with a participatory approach. The final outcomes consisted in the definition of recommendations on the social cohesion among citizens, and the sensitiveness toward migrants' isolation and fear.</p>","PeriodicalId":46123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community","volume":"50 3","pages":"224-239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10852352.2021.1918614","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2021.1918614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One consequence of the securitarian approach against terrorism is the conflictual request both to "spot radicals" and build social cohesion in local communities. As a result, migrants' communities feel discriminated and treated as a "suspect community". The European Project PROVA addressed the prevention of violent radicalization in youth, involving professionals and representatives of local communities, and producing Guidelines in order to contrast the marginalization of suspected communities. The empirical research refers to an innovative way to carry out the Participatory Consensus Conference (PCC), used to define Guidelines aimed at identifying suitable recommendations, costs and benefits for the foreseen policies. Participants were 12 stakeholders (Local Authorities, Juvenile Justice System, NGOs, and Educational Institutions). Methods: the PCC used a scientific process for achieving an agreement with a participatory approach. The final outcomes consisted in the definition of recommendations on the social cohesion among citizens, and the sensitiveness toward migrants' isolation and fear.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
移民是嫌疑犯?促进福祉和包容的参与性协商一致会议。
以安全主义方式打击恐怖主义的一个后果是,既要“发现激进分子”,又要在当地社区建立社会凝聚力。因此,移民社区感到受到歧视,被视为“可疑社区”。欧洲PROVA项目涉及防止青年暴力激进化问题,由专业人员和当地社区代表参与,并制定准则,以便对比可疑社区的边缘化情况。实证研究指的是一种创新的方式来开展参与性共识会议(PCC),用于确定旨在确定预期政策的适当建议、成本和收益的准则。与会者是12个利益攸关方(地方当局、少年司法系统、非政府组织和教育机构)。方法:PCC采用科学的流程,以参与式的方式达成协议。最后的成果包括确定关于公民之间的社会凝聚力和对移民的孤立和恐惧的敏感性的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Communityis on the cutting edge of social action and change, not only covering current thought and developments, but also defining future directions in the field. Under the editorship of Joseph R. Ferrari since 1995, Prevention in Human Services was retitled as the Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Communityto reflect its focus of providing professionals with information on the leading, effective programs for community intervention and prevention of problems. Because of its intensive coverage of selected topics and the sheer length of each issue, the Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community is the first-and in many cases, primary-source of information for mental health and human services development.
期刊最新文献
Addressing cardiovascular health risk factors in American Indian/Alaska Native Children: A narrative review. Youth participatory action research (YPAR) to promote educational equity. Principles of Equity and Inclusion in Action: A Case Study of Democratic Deliberation. Addressing the need for health equity reform in rural community hospitals: Centering the voices of local health care stakeholders. Connect to collect: lessons learned from a Utah school-based intervention to increase take-up of the EITC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1