The assessment of executive functioning in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors: A recommendation to combine caregiver-based ratings and performance-based tests.
Hoffmann-Lamplmair Doris, Ritter Irene, Leiss Ulrike, Slavc Irene, Pletschko Thomas
{"title":"The assessment of executive functioning in pediatric patients with posterior fossa tumors: A recommendation to combine caregiver-based ratings and performance-based tests.","authors":"Hoffmann-Lamplmair Doris, Ritter Irene, Leiss Ulrike, Slavc Irene, Pletschko Thomas","doi":"10.1080/17518423.2021.1915404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study addresses the issue of drawing valid conclusions about the assessment of executive functioning (EF) in long-term survivors of pediatric posterior fossa tumors (PPFT).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>All 44 patients (females = 18, mean age = 11 years) were treated consecutively at our department for PPFTs (medulloblastomas, ependymomas, low-grade-gliomas). Four years after diagnosis, their EF was investigated, considering age at diagnosis and treatment type. The validity, sensitivity, and specificity of different EF measures (TMT-B, Number Repetition, WCST, BRIEF) were compared and Strengths-and-Difficulties-Questionnaire was incorporated as a potential screening for EF issues.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EF impairments were found, especially in patients with chemo-/radiotherapy. Caregiver-ratings and performance-based-EF-tests identified different patients as below average. Sensitivity was highest in TMT-B. Strengths-and-Difficulties-Questionnaire was not an adequate screening for EF.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is essential to assess patients with PPFT with performance-based-tests as well as caregiver-questionnaires, since EF impairments are not always visible at the behavioral level but may still influence everyday life.</p>","PeriodicalId":51227,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Neurorehabilitation","volume":"25 1","pages":"19-28"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17518423.2021.1915404","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Neurorehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2021.1915404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Objective: This study addresses the issue of drawing valid conclusions about the assessment of executive functioning (EF) in long-term survivors of pediatric posterior fossa tumors (PPFT).
Method: All 44 patients (females = 18, mean age = 11 years) were treated consecutively at our department for PPFTs (medulloblastomas, ependymomas, low-grade-gliomas). Four years after diagnosis, their EF was investigated, considering age at diagnosis and treatment type. The validity, sensitivity, and specificity of different EF measures (TMT-B, Number Repetition, WCST, BRIEF) were compared and Strengths-and-Difficulties-Questionnaire was incorporated as a potential screening for EF issues.
Results: EF impairments were found, especially in patients with chemo-/radiotherapy. Caregiver-ratings and performance-based-EF-tests identified different patients as below average. Sensitivity was highest in TMT-B. Strengths-and-Difficulties-Questionnaire was not an adequate screening for EF.
Conclusion: It is essential to assess patients with PPFT with performance-based-tests as well as caregiver-questionnaires, since EF impairments are not always visible at the behavioral level but may still influence everyday life.
期刊介绍:
Developmental Neurorehabilitation aims to enhance recovery, rehabilitation and education of people with brain injury, neurological disorders, and other developmental, physical and intellectual disabilities. Although there is an emphasis on childhood, developmental disability can be considered from a lifespan perspective. This perspective acknowledges that development occurs throughout a person’s life and thus a range of impairments or diseases can cause a disability that can affect development at any stage of life.