Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Studies on Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Mini-review of the Recent Evidence.

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2021-01-11 eCollection Date: 2020-10-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_71
Amir Hossein Alizadeh Bahmani, Mehdi Hoorang, Sheida Hosseini, Mehrnoosh Eskandari, Kiana Shayestehfard, Mahyar Shekoohi, Nazafarin Hatami-Mazinani, Saba Afifi, Ali Mohammad Sabzghabaee, Payam Peymani
{"title":"Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Studies on Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Mini-review of the Recent Evidence.","authors":"Amir Hossein Alizadeh Bahmani, Mehdi Hoorang, Sheida Hosseini, Mehrnoosh Eskandari, Kiana Shayestehfard, Mahyar Shekoohi, Nazafarin Hatami-Mazinani, Saba Afifi, Ali Mohammad Sabzghabaee, Payam Peymani","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_71","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) is an extremely transmittable microbial infection that has emerged in Wuhan (China) in late 2019, leading to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 syndrome, and caused a pandemic all over the globe. This study is a systematic review of all 927 clinical trial studies performed worldwide from the beginning of the COVID-19 mysterious pandemic in China. These researches have registered in different databases. According to the best of our knowledge, China (74.82%), the United States (4.49%), and France (2.72%) have the most significant number of clinical trials, respectively. Clinical trials can be randomized or nonrandomized. Due to our results, 32.58% of studies were randomized, and 7.12% were not randomized. Most of the studies were open-labeled studies (22.44%), and double-blinded (4.42%) and quadruple blinded (2.48%) studies stand in second and third place regarding the number of trials, respectively. The direction and quantity of clinical trials attempted to identify a possible cure for COVID-19 demonstrates the depth of this crisis. As we are writing this article, a significant international endeavor will find a cure or vaccine for containing this devastating and mysterious disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"9 4","pages":"175-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/4d/ca/JRPP-9-175.PMC8067895.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.JRPP_20_71","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronavirus 19 (COVID-19) is an extremely transmittable microbial infection that has emerged in Wuhan (China) in late 2019, leading to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 syndrome, and caused a pandemic all over the globe. This study is a systematic review of all 927 clinical trial studies performed worldwide from the beginning of the COVID-19 mysterious pandemic in China. These researches have registered in different databases. According to the best of our knowledge, China (74.82%), the United States (4.49%), and France (2.72%) have the most significant number of clinical trials, respectively. Clinical trials can be randomized or nonrandomized. Due to our results, 32.58% of studies were randomized, and 7.12% were not randomized. Most of the studies were open-labeled studies (22.44%), and double-blinded (4.42%) and quadruple blinded (2.48%) studies stand in second and third place regarding the number of trials, respectively. The direction and quantity of clinical trials attempted to identify a possible cure for COVID-19 demonstrates the depth of this crisis. As we are writing this article, a significant international endeavor will find a cure or vaccine for containing this devastating and mysterious disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019 年冠状病毒疾病的药理和非药理研究:最新证据小综述》。
冠状病毒19(COVID-19)是一种极易传播的微生物感染,2019年底在中国武汉出现,导致严重急性呼吸道综合征冠状病毒2综合征,并在全球引起大流行。本研究系统回顾了自中国 COVID-19 神秘大流行开始以来全球进行的所有 927 项临床试验研究。这些研究已在不同的数据库中登记。据我们所知,中国(74.82%)、美国(4.49%)和法国(2.72%)分别拥有最多的临床试验。临床试验可以是随机的,也可以是非随机的。根据我们的研究结果,32.58%的研究为随机研究,7.12%的研究为非随机研究。大部分研究为开放标签研究(22.44%),双盲研究(4.42%)和四重盲研究(2.48%)的数量分别排在第二和第三位。为寻找治疗 COVID-19 的可能方法而进行的临床试验的方向和数量表明了这场危机的严重性。就在我们撰写这篇文章的时候,国际上正在努力寻找治疗这种毁灭性神秘疾病的方法或疫苗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Sirolimus (Rapamycin) in the Management of Infantile Hemangioma. Community Pharmacy Dispensing Errors: A Comprehensive Systematic Review on Trends and Solutions. Evaluating the Role of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Oncology Drug Repurposing Efforts. Evaluation of Synergistic Effect of Colistin with Levofloxacin and Meropenem against Multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Associations between Patients' Demographics and Chronic Medication Utilization in Internal Medicine: Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1