Adaptation of the Aphasia Impact Questionnaire-21 into Turkish: Reliability and validity study.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2021-04-28 DOI:10.1080/09602011.2021.1917427
Esra Yaşar, Nazmiye Evra Günhan Şenol, Gözde Ertürk Zararsız, Namık Yücel Birol
{"title":"Adaptation of the Aphasia Impact Questionnaire-21 into Turkish: Reliability and validity study.","authors":"Esra Yaşar,&nbsp;Nazmiye Evra Günhan Şenol,&nbsp;Gözde Ertürk Zararsız,&nbsp;Namık Yücel Birol","doi":"10.1080/09602011.2021.1917427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Practices for the evaluation and treatment for people with aphasia (PWA) is dominated by an impairment-based view of aphasia. The number of aphasia evaluation tools adapted or developed to reflect PWA's perspective in Turkish is limited. Aphasia Impact Questionnaire-21 (AIQ-21), a tool developed based on the social model of disability, measures the individuals' quality of life from their own perspective. This study sought to adapt and establish the validity and reliability of AIQ-21 in Turkish (AIQ-21-TR) to meet this need. Data from 43 PWA and 61 healthy participants were analysed to determine AIQ-21-TR's construct, criterion, face validity and content validity. Reliability of the scale was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficients and the inter-item and item-total score correlations coefficients. Correlation between AIQ-21-TR and Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 Turkish (SAQOL-39-TR) was also calculated. The validity analysis indicated that the Turkish adaptation of AIQ-21 has a high level of construct, content, face, and criterion validity. Similarly, the reliability analysis showed that the adapted questionnaire has an excellent reliability coefficient (<i>α</i> = 0.91). Our findings suggested that AIQ-21-TR may be used as a reliable and valid tool with PWA in clinical and research settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54729,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1550-1575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09602011.2021.1917427","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychological Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2021.1917427","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Practices for the evaluation and treatment for people with aphasia (PWA) is dominated by an impairment-based view of aphasia. The number of aphasia evaluation tools adapted or developed to reflect PWA's perspective in Turkish is limited. Aphasia Impact Questionnaire-21 (AIQ-21), a tool developed based on the social model of disability, measures the individuals' quality of life from their own perspective. This study sought to adapt and establish the validity and reliability of AIQ-21 in Turkish (AIQ-21-TR) to meet this need. Data from 43 PWA and 61 healthy participants were analysed to determine AIQ-21-TR's construct, criterion, face validity and content validity. Reliability of the scale was assessed using Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficients and the inter-item and item-total score correlations coefficients. Correlation between AIQ-21-TR and Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 Turkish (SAQOL-39-TR) was also calculated. The validity analysis indicated that the Turkish adaptation of AIQ-21 has a high level of construct, content, face, and criterion validity. Similarly, the reliability analysis showed that the adapted questionnaire has an excellent reliability coefficient (α = 0.91). Our findings suggested that AIQ-21-TR may be used as a reliable and valid tool with PWA in clinical and research settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
失语症影响问卷-21在土耳其语中的改写:信度和效度研究。
评估和治疗失语症(PWA)的实践主要是基于失语症的损伤观点。适应或开发的失语症评估工具的数量是有限的,以反映PWA在土耳其的观点。失语影响问卷-21 (AIQ-21)是一种基于残疾社会模型开发的工具,从个体自身的角度衡量个体的生活质量。本研究试图调整并建立土耳其语AIQ-21 (AIQ-21- tr)的效度和可靠性,以满足这一需求。对43名PWA和61名健康被试的数据进行分析,确定AIQ-21-TR的结构、量表、面效度和内容效度。量表的信度采用Cronbach's Alpha信度系数和项目间及项目总分相关系数进行评估。并计算AIQ-21-TR与卒中和失语生活质量量表-39 (SAQOL-39-TR)的相关性。效度分析表明,AIQ-21的土耳其语改编具有较高的构念、内容、面效和标准效度。同样,信度分析表明,调整后的问卷具有良好的信度系数(α = 0.91)。我们的研究结果表明,AIQ-21-TR可作为临床和研究环境中PWA的可靠有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuropsychological Rehabilitation publishes human experimental and clinical research related to rehabilitation, recovery of function, and brain plasticity. The journal is aimed at clinicians who wish to inform their practice in the light of the latest scientific research; at researchers in neurorehabilitation; and finally at researchers in cognitive neuroscience and related fields interested in the mechanisms of recovery and rehabilitation. Papers on neuropsychological assessment will be considered, and special topic reviews (2500-5000 words) addressing specific key questions in rehabilitation, recovery and brain plasticity will also be welcomed. The latter will enter a fast-track refereeing process.
期刊最新文献
Effect of psychological interventions on depressive symptoms in the long term after acquired brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cognitively stimulating activities in multiple sclerosis: A qualitative feasibility study. Patient and clinician perspectives of the use of driving simulators for rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. "A period of limbo": The experience of being a male family member of a person in a prolonged disorder of consciousness (PDoC); an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. Use of immersive virtual reality to explore visual search behaviour in individuals with visuospatial neglect after stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1