American Indian and Alaska Native Enrollment in Clinical Studies in the National Institutes of Health's Intramural Research Program

Q2 Social Sciences Ethics & human research Pub Date : 2021-05-21 DOI:10.1002/eahr.500090
Deionna Vigil, Ninet Sinaii, Barbara Karp
{"title":"American Indian and Alaska Native Enrollment in Clinical Studies in the National Institutes of Health's Intramural Research Program","authors":"Deionna Vigil,&nbsp;Ninet Sinaii,&nbsp;Barbara Karp","doi":"10.1002/eahr.500090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Clinical studies conducted by the National Institutes of Health's Intramural Research Program (NIH-IRP) provide eligible individuals with access to innovative research treatments that may not otherwise be available. The NIH-IRP's mission is to include all Americans, including American Indians and Alaska Natives, in its clinical research. This study is the first to provide data about inclusion of American Indians/Alaska Natives in NIH-IRP clinical studies. We analyzed data from the more than 1,800 NIH-IRP protocols active in 2014 and 2017. We found that the absolute number of American Indian/Alaska Native enrollees increased between 2014 and 2017 but remained at 1% of all participants, a disproportionately low level. The number of clinical studies that enrolled American Indian/Alaska Native individuals similarly did not change. NIH efforts to expand participation of American Indians/Alaska Natives in clinical studies has often focused on research within their communities or on health needs specific to these groups. Those efforts should expand to include processes and protections for the proportionate and ethical inclusion of American Indians and Alaska Natives who individually enroll in studies that are not specific to American Indians, Alaska Natives, or their tribal nations.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36829,"journal":{"name":"Ethics & human research","volume":"43 3","pages":"2-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/eahr.500090","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethics & human research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eahr.500090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Clinical studies conducted by the National Institutes of Health's Intramural Research Program (NIH-IRP) provide eligible individuals with access to innovative research treatments that may not otherwise be available. The NIH-IRP's mission is to include all Americans, including American Indians and Alaska Natives, in its clinical research. This study is the first to provide data about inclusion of American Indians/Alaska Natives in NIH-IRP clinical studies. We analyzed data from the more than 1,800 NIH-IRP protocols active in 2014 and 2017. We found that the absolute number of American Indian/Alaska Native enrollees increased between 2014 and 2017 but remained at 1% of all participants, a disproportionately low level. The number of clinical studies that enrolled American Indian/Alaska Native individuals similarly did not change. NIH efforts to expand participation of American Indians/Alaska Natives in clinical studies has often focused on research within their communities or on health needs specific to these groups. Those efforts should expand to include processes and protections for the proportionate and ethical inclusion of American Indians and Alaska Natives who individually enroll in studies that are not specific to American Indians, Alaska Natives, or their tribal nations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民在美国国立卫生研究院校内研究项目临床研究中的注册
由美国国立卫生研究院的校内研究计划(NIH-IRP)进行的临床研究为符合条件的个人提供了可能无法获得的创新研究治疗的机会。NIH-IRP的使命是将所有美国人包括美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民纳入其临床研究。这项研究首次提供了关于将美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民纳入NIH-IRP临床研究的数据。我们分析了2014年和2017年活跃的1800多个NIH-IRP协议的数据。我们发现,2014年至2017年间,美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民参保人数的绝对数量有所增加,但仍只占所有参保人数的1%,这是一个不成比例的低水平。招募美国印第安人/阿拉斯加土著个体的临床研究数量同样没有变化。美国国立卫生研究院扩大美国印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民参与临床研究的努力往往集中在他们社区内的研究或这些群体的具体健康需求上。这些努力应该扩大到包括对美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的程序和保护,这些印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民个人参加的研究不是针对美国印第安人、阿拉斯加原住民或他们的部落国家的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ethics & human research
Ethics & human research Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Prospect of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Ethics Review Ethical Issues Faced by Data Monitoring Committees: Results from an Exploratory Qualitative Study The Ethical Case for Decentralized Clinical Trials The European Health Data Space as a Case Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1