Forensic Pluralism and the Dead Body in Early 20th-Century China.

Q4 Medicine Academic Forensic Pathology Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2021-03-25 DOI:10.1177/19253621211002504
Daniel Asen
{"title":"Forensic Pluralism and the Dead Body in Early 20th-Century China.","authors":"Daniel Asen","doi":"10.1177/19253621211002504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Modern forensic medicine was introduced into China during the first decades of the 20th century. The members of China's first generation of medicolegal experts were soon advocating that medical expertise play a greater role in police and judicial officials' investigations of suspicious death and homicide cases. While forensic reform in China had parallels with developments in other contemporary societies in which physicians were pushing for a greater role in the law, this process unfolded in China in unique ways, against the backdrop of an older tradition of forensic science that had developed under the Qing dynasty (1644-1911). Central to this tradition was the <i>Records on the Washing Away of Wrongs</i>, a handbook of forensic practice that was written in the 13th century and saw numerous editions and expansions over subsequent centuries. Death investigation in early 20th-century China was defined by \"forensic pluralism,\" a situation in which the different body examination methods and standards of forensic proof associated with the <i>Washing Away of Wrongs</i> and modern forensic medicine were both accepted by officialdom and society. This article untangles the complexities of forensic practice during this period through the rather unexceptional exchange over a case of suspected drowning that occurred between local officials in Hebei province and Lin Ji (1897-1951), director of the Beiping University Medical School Institute of Legal Medicine. This case reveals the different regimes of forensic knowledge and practice that were used in China during this period as well as the sites at which they interacted.</p>","PeriodicalId":36813,"journal":{"name":"Academic Forensic Pathology","volume":"11 1","pages":"41-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/19253621211002504","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Forensic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621211002504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Modern forensic medicine was introduced into China during the first decades of the 20th century. The members of China's first generation of medicolegal experts were soon advocating that medical expertise play a greater role in police and judicial officials' investigations of suspicious death and homicide cases. While forensic reform in China had parallels with developments in other contemporary societies in which physicians were pushing for a greater role in the law, this process unfolded in China in unique ways, against the backdrop of an older tradition of forensic science that had developed under the Qing dynasty (1644-1911). Central to this tradition was the Records on the Washing Away of Wrongs, a handbook of forensic practice that was written in the 13th century and saw numerous editions and expansions over subsequent centuries. Death investigation in early 20th-century China was defined by "forensic pluralism," a situation in which the different body examination methods and standards of forensic proof associated with the Washing Away of Wrongs and modern forensic medicine were both accepted by officialdom and society. This article untangles the complexities of forensic practice during this period through the rather unexceptional exchange over a case of suspected drowning that occurred between local officials in Hebei province and Lin Ji (1897-1951), director of the Beiping University Medical School Institute of Legal Medicine. This case reveals the different regimes of forensic knowledge and practice that were used in China during this period as well as the sites at which they interacted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法医多元论与20世纪初中国的尸体。
现代法医学是在20世纪头十年传入中国的。中国第一代法医学专家的成员很快就主张,在警察和司法官员调查可疑的死亡和凶杀案件时,医学专业知识应发挥更大的作用。虽然中国的法医学改革与其他当代社会的发展有相似之处,在这些社会中,医生在法律中发挥了更大的作用,但这一进程在中国以独特的方式展开,其背景是清朝(1644-1911)时期发展起来的法医学传统。这一传统的核心是《洗去冤案记录》(Records on Washing Away of wrong),这是一本法医实践手册,写于13世纪,在随后的几个世纪里经历了无数次的修订和扩充。20世纪初,中国的死亡调查被定义为“法医多元化”,在这种情况下,与“洗去冤案”和现代法医相关的不同尸体检验方法和法医证明标准都被官场和社会所接受。本文通过河北省地方官员与北平大学医学院法医学研究所所长林吉(1897-1951)就一起疑似溺水案进行的相当寻常的交流,梳理了这一时期法医实践的复杂性。本案例揭示了这一时期在中国使用的不同的法医知识和实践制度,以及它们相互作用的地点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Forensic Pathology
Academic Forensic Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Concealed Homicide in a Sexually Abused Child. The Sudden Death of Cardinal Decio Azzolino Junior (1623-1689), the Universal Heir of Queen Christina of Sweden: A Dropsy Case? Deaths Related to New-Onset Seizures After Vaccination. Left Thumb to Left Big Toe: An Uncommon Case of Electrocution Suicide. Forensic Pathologist Testimony, Part 1: Common Questions and Considerations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1