Endoparasite prevalence and infection risk factors among cats in an animal shelter in Estonia.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PARASITOLOGY Folia Parasitologica Pub Date : 2021-04-20 DOI:10.14411/fp.2021.010
Ants Tull, Epp Moks, Urmas Saarma
{"title":"Endoparasite prevalence and infection risk factors among cats in an animal shelter in Estonia.","authors":"Ants Tull,&nbsp;Epp Moks,&nbsp;Urmas Saarma","doi":"10.14411/fp.2021.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cats are important hosts for different zoonotic parasites that can be hazardous to human health. To date, few studies have attempted to identify the factors affecting parasitic infections in shelter animals. This study aims to analyse the presence of endoparasites in shelter cats in Tartu, Estonia, and identify factors affecting endoparasite prevalence and intensity. The risk factors considered were age, location (urban vs rural cats) and time spent in shelter. In total, 290 faecal samples were collected from cats at an animal shelter in 2015-2016 and investigated for endoparasites using the concentration flotation technique. In total, 138 shelter cats (47.6%) were infected with endoparasites and their overall prevalence was: Toxocara cati (36.6%), Cystoisospora spp. (12.4%), Taeniidae gen. sp. (4.1%), Toxoplasma gondii/Hammondia hammondi (3.4%), Eucoleus aerophilus (2.1%), Cryptosporidium spp. (2.1%), Ancylostoma sp. (0.7%) and Giardia sp. (0.7%). Coinfections occurred in 38 cats (13.1%) most frequently of T. cati and Cystoisospora spp. (4.5%), Cystoisospora spp. and T. gondii/H. hammondi (2.1%). Where species identification of cestode and nematode samples was not possible according to morphology, genetic analysis of the mitochondrial cox1 gene was carried out. DNA was successfully analysed for 6 out of 13 samples that required genetic identification, revealing Ancylostoma tubaeforme in one nematode sample and Hydatigera taeniaeformis in five cestode samples. Cats from rural areas had significantly higher endoparasite prevalence than cats from urban areas. Helminth prevalence decreased to some extent due to anthelmintic treatment in cats available for adoption (held ≥15 days in the shelter), whereas the prevalence of infection with protists increased significantly in these animals. It is important to note that the analysis revealed lower infection intensity for quarantine cats (held 1-14 days in the shelter) compared with cats available for adoption. The relatively high prevalence of endoparasites (including zoonotic) in shelter cats ready for adoption suggests that current anthelminthic procedures require improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":55154,"journal":{"name":"Folia Parasitologica","volume":"68 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Parasitologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2021.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PARASITOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Cats are important hosts for different zoonotic parasites that can be hazardous to human health. To date, few studies have attempted to identify the factors affecting parasitic infections in shelter animals. This study aims to analyse the presence of endoparasites in shelter cats in Tartu, Estonia, and identify factors affecting endoparasite prevalence and intensity. The risk factors considered were age, location (urban vs rural cats) and time spent in shelter. In total, 290 faecal samples were collected from cats at an animal shelter in 2015-2016 and investigated for endoparasites using the concentration flotation technique. In total, 138 shelter cats (47.6%) were infected with endoparasites and their overall prevalence was: Toxocara cati (36.6%), Cystoisospora spp. (12.4%), Taeniidae gen. sp. (4.1%), Toxoplasma gondii/Hammondia hammondi (3.4%), Eucoleus aerophilus (2.1%), Cryptosporidium spp. (2.1%), Ancylostoma sp. (0.7%) and Giardia sp. (0.7%). Coinfections occurred in 38 cats (13.1%) most frequently of T. cati and Cystoisospora spp. (4.5%), Cystoisospora spp. and T. gondii/H. hammondi (2.1%). Where species identification of cestode and nematode samples was not possible according to morphology, genetic analysis of the mitochondrial cox1 gene was carried out. DNA was successfully analysed for 6 out of 13 samples that required genetic identification, revealing Ancylostoma tubaeforme in one nematode sample and Hydatigera taeniaeformis in five cestode samples. Cats from rural areas had significantly higher endoparasite prevalence than cats from urban areas. Helminth prevalence decreased to some extent due to anthelmintic treatment in cats available for adoption (held ≥15 days in the shelter), whereas the prevalence of infection with protists increased significantly in these animals. It is important to note that the analysis revealed lower infection intensity for quarantine cats (held 1-14 days in the shelter) compared with cats available for adoption. The relatively high prevalence of endoparasites (including zoonotic) in shelter cats ready for adoption suggests that current anthelminthic procedures require improvements.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱沙尼亚动物收容所猫体内寄生虫流行率和感染风险因素。
猫是对人类健康有害的各种人畜共患寄生虫的重要宿主。迄今为止,很少有研究试图确定影响收容所动物寄生虫感染的因素。本研究旨在分析爱沙尼亚塔尔图收容所猫体内寄生虫的存在,并确定影响体内寄生虫流行和强度的因素。考虑的风险因素包括年龄、地点(城市猫与农村猫)和在收容所呆的时间。2015-2016年,在动物收容所共收集了290份猫的粪便样本,并使用浓缩浮选技术调查了体内寄生虫。共有138只收容猫感染内寄生虫(47.6%),总体流行率依次为:猫弓形虫(36.6%)、囊异孢子虫(12.4%)、带绦虫(4.1%)、刚地弓形虫/钩蚴(3.4%)、嗜气桉(2.1%)、隐孢子虫(2.1%)、钩虫(0.7%)和贾第鞭毛虫(0.7%)。38只猫共感染(13.1%),以猫绦虫与囊异孢子虫共感染(4.5%)、囊异孢子虫与刚地弓形虫共感染最为常见。hammondi(2.1%)。在无法根据形态学对虫和线虫样本进行物种鉴定的情况下,对线粒体cox1基因进行遗传分析。在13个需要基因鉴定的样本中,成功分析了6个样本的DNA,在一个线虫样本中发现了管状钩虫,在5个线虫样本中发现了带状棘球蚴。农村地区猫的内寄生虫患病率明显高于城市地区猫。由于对供收养的猫(在收容所关押≥15天)进行了驱虫治疗,蠕虫流行率在一定程度上有所下降,而这些动物中原生生物感染的流行率却显著增加。值得注意的是,分析显示,与可供收养的猫相比,隔离猫(在收容所关押1-14天)的感染强度较低。收容所准备收养的猫体内寄生虫(包括人畜共患病)的患病率相对较高,这表明目前的驱虫程序需要改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Parasitologica
Folia Parasitologica 医学-寄生虫学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: FOLIA PARASITOLOGICA, issued in online versions, is an international journal that covers the whole field of general, systematic, ecological and experimental parasitology. It publishes original research papers, research notes and review articles. Contributions from all branches of animal parasitology, such as morphology, taxonomy, biology, biochemistry, physiology, immunology, molecular biology and evolution of parasites, and host-parasite relationships, are eligible. Novelty and importance in the international (not local or regional) context are required. New geographical records of parasites, records of new hosts, regional parasite and/or host surveys (if they constitute the principal substance of manuscript), local/regional prevalence surveys of diseases, local/regional studies on epidemiology of well known diseases and of parasite impact on human/animal health, case reports, routine clinical studies and testing of established diagnostic or treatment procedures, will not be considered. One species description will also not be considered unless they include more general information, such as new diagnostic characters, host-parasite associations, phylogenetic implications, etc. Manuscripts found suitable on submission will be reviewed by at least two reviewers.
期刊最新文献
Redescription of Proteocephalus fallax La Rue, 1911 (Cestoda) and a list of proteocephalid tapeworms of whitefish (Coregonus spp.). Description of three new species of Kudoa Meglitsch, 1947 (Myxozoa: Multivalvulida) in commercial marine fishes from southern China, and new host records. Nuts and bolts of the behavioural manipulation by Toxoplasma gondii. The linking of toxoplasmosis and schizophrenia. Unraveling the mystery of a myxozoan parasite of the trout: redescription of Chloromyxum schurovi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1