A population-based prospective study on rest-activity rhythm and mild cognitive impairment among Hong Kong healthy community-dwelling older adults

Priscilla Ming Yi Lee, Bonnie Ho Ling Kwok, Julie Yuen Ting Ma, Lap Ah Tse
{"title":"A population-based prospective study on rest-activity rhythm and mild cognitive impairment among Hong Kong healthy community-dwelling older adults","authors":"Priscilla Ming Yi Lee,&nbsp;Bonnie Ho Ling Kwok,&nbsp;Julie Yuen Ting Ma,&nbsp;Lap Ah Tse","doi":"10.1016/j.nbscr.2021.100065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Relatively few studies investigated the association between rest-activity circadian rhythm and cognitive impairment in population-based study, and the evidence from Asian populations is sparse. We aimed to examine the relationship of actigraphy measured rest-activity circadian rhythm with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or cognitive impairment in Hong Kong healthy community-dwelling older adults.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We recruited 174 Hong Kong healthy adults aged ≥65 years (36 male vs. 138 female) during April–September 2018, and followed up them for 12 months. Participants were invited to wear wrist actigraphy for 7 days in both baseline and follow-up study. We used the actigraph data to calculate their midline statistic of rhythm (MESOR), amplitude, acrophase and percent rhythm. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to assess their cognitive scores at baseline and follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression model was performed to estimate the association of rest-activity circadian rhythm parameters with MCI; whilst multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine the association between rhythm parameters and changes of cognitive scores (i.e., worsen: &lt;-1, stable: -1 to 1, better cognition: ≥2) after 12-months follow-up respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There was no association between rest-activity circadian rhythm parameters and MCI or cognitive impairment at baseline. Compared to those with an averaged value of acrophase (1:24pm-3:00pm), results of multinominal logistic regression showed that participants with a delayed acrophase (after 3:00pm) were less likely to have better cognition (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.11–0.88). Upon one year of follow-up, participants who delayed their acrophase for 24 min than their baseline measurements were also less likely to have better cognitive functions (AOR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.08–0.79).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Results from both the baseline survey and follow-up study consistently confirmed that older adults, especially in light of the majority of participants being the females, with delayed acrophase were less likely to have better cognition in the Asian population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37827,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.nbscr.2021.100065","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451994421000067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background

Relatively few studies investigated the association between rest-activity circadian rhythm and cognitive impairment in population-based study, and the evidence from Asian populations is sparse. We aimed to examine the relationship of actigraphy measured rest-activity circadian rhythm with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or cognitive impairment in Hong Kong healthy community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

We recruited 174 Hong Kong healthy adults aged ≥65 years (36 male vs. 138 female) during April–September 2018, and followed up them for 12 months. Participants were invited to wear wrist actigraphy for 7 days in both baseline and follow-up study. We used the actigraph data to calculate their midline statistic of rhythm (MESOR), amplitude, acrophase and percent rhythm. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to assess their cognitive scores at baseline and follow-up. Multivariate logistic regression model was performed to estimate the association of rest-activity circadian rhythm parameters with MCI; whilst multinomial logistic regression model was used to examine the association between rhythm parameters and changes of cognitive scores (i.e., worsen: <-1, stable: -1 to 1, better cognition: ≥2) after 12-months follow-up respectively.

Results

There was no association between rest-activity circadian rhythm parameters and MCI or cognitive impairment at baseline. Compared to those with an averaged value of acrophase (1:24pm-3:00pm), results of multinominal logistic regression showed that participants with a delayed acrophase (after 3:00pm) were less likely to have better cognition (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.11–0.88). Upon one year of follow-up, participants who delayed their acrophase for 24 min than their baseline measurements were also less likely to have better cognitive functions (AOR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.08–0.79).

Conclusions

Results from both the baseline survey and follow-up study consistently confirmed that older adults, especially in light of the majority of participants being the females, with delayed acrophase were less likely to have better cognition in the Asian population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
香港健康社区老年人休息-活动节律与轻度认知障碍的一项基于人群的前瞻性研究
基于人群的研究中,关于休息-活动昼夜节律与认知障碍之间关系的研究相对较少,而且来自亚洲人群的证据较少。我们的目的是研究活动记录仪测量的休息-活动昼夜节律与香港健康社区老年人轻度认知障碍(MCI)或认知障碍的关系。方法于2018年4 - 9月招募174名年龄≥65岁的香港健康成年人(男性36人,女性138人),随访12个月。在基线和随访研究中,参与者被邀请佩戴腕部活动记录仪7天。我们用活动记录仪的数据计算他们的节奏中线统计(MESOR)、幅度、端相和百分比节奏。采用蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)对患者进行基线和随访时的认知评分。采用多变量logistic回归模型估计休息-活动昼夜节律参数与MCI的关系;同时采用多项logistic回归模型分别考察节奏参数与随访12个月后认知评分变化(恶化:<-1,稳定:-1,认知改善:≥2)的相关性。结果静息-活动昼夜节律参数与MCI和认知功能障碍无相关性。多项logistic回归结果显示,与肩相期平均值(1:24pm-3:00pm)的受试者相比,肩相期延迟(3:00pm后)的受试者认知能力较差(调整优势比(AOR) = 0.32, 95%置信区间(CI) = 0.11-0.88)。在一年的随访中,与基线测量值相比,顶相延迟24分钟的参与者也不太可能有更好的认知功能(AOR = 0.26, 95%CI = 0.08-0.79)。结论:基线调查和后续研究的结果一致证实,在亚洲人群中,顶相延迟的老年人(尤其是大多数参与者为女性)不太可能有更好的认知能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms
Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms is a multidisciplinary journal for the publication of original research and review articles on basic and translational research into sleep and circadian rhythms. The journal focuses on topics covering the mechanisms of sleep/wake and circadian regulation from molecular to systems level, and on the functional consequences of sleep and circadian disruption. A key aim of the journal is the translation of basic research findings to understand and treat sleep and circadian disorders. Topics include, but are not limited to: Basic and translational research, Molecular mechanisms, Genetics and epigenetics, Inflammation and immunology, Memory and learning, Neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, Neuropsychopharmacology and neuroendocrinology, Behavioral sleep and circadian disorders, Shiftwork, Social jetlag.
期刊最新文献
Synergy between time-restricted feeding and time-restricted running is necessary to shift the muscle clock in male wistar rats Gender differences in sleep quality among Iranian traditional and industrial drug users Development of Sleep and Circadian Rhythms: Function and Dysfunction. Effects of age and sex on photoperiod modulation of nucleus accumbens monoamine content and release in adolescence and adulthood The impact of long haul travel on the sleep of elite athletes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1