Des modes de savoir pour affirmer une épistémologie disciplinaire infirmière : des surinterprétations et réductions dans les travaux de Chinn et Kramer.

IF 0.3 Q4 Medicine Recherche en Soins Infirmiers Pub Date : 2021-04-26 DOI:10.3917/rsi.144.0044
Nicolas Vonarx
{"title":"Des modes de savoir pour affirmer une épistémologie disciplinaire infirmière : des surinterprétations et réductions dans les travaux de Chinn et Kramer.","authors":"Nicolas Vonarx","doi":"10.3917/rsi.144.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Every academic discipline nurturing its own science draws on the development and dissemination of a knowledge. In pursuit of this project, the nursing discipline has proposed various conceptualizations of knowledge. The one developed by Chinn and Kramer, following Carper&#8217;s work, is without doubt the most prominent and most often borrowed concept in discussing the epistemological foundations of the discipline. This thoughtful article proposes an in-depth critical analysis of this theoretical development by focusing on &#8220;personal&#8221; and &#8220;esthetic&#8221; knowledge. As part of the analysis, the author scrutinizes the inherent logics that support these patterns of knowing. Finally, the author highlights some overinterpretations and discrepancies with regard to nursing practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":44071,"journal":{"name":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recherche en Soins Infirmiers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/rsi.144.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Every academic discipline nurturing its own science draws on the development and dissemination of a knowledge. In pursuit of this project, the nursing discipline has proposed various conceptualizations of knowledge. The one developed by Chinn and Kramer, following Carper’s work, is without doubt the most prominent and most often borrowed concept in discussing the epistemological foundations of the discipline. This thoughtful article proposes an in-depth critical analysis of this theoretical development by focusing on “personal” and “esthetic” knowledge. As part of the analysis, the author scrutinizes the inherent logics that support these patterns of knowing. Finally, the author highlights some overinterpretations and discrepancies with regard to nursing practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立护理学科认识论的知识模式:Chinn和Kramer工作中的过度解释和简化。
每一门学科都在发展和传播一种知识。在追求这个项目,护理学科提出了各种概念的知识。Chinn和Kramer在carper的工作之后提出的概念,无疑是讨论该学科的认识论基础时最突出和最常被借用的概念。这篇深思熟虑的文章提出了对这一理论发展的深入批判性分析,重点关注个人”和& # 8220;审美# 8221;知识。作为分析的一部分,作者仔细审视了支持这些认知模式的内在逻辑。最后,作者强调了一些关于护理实践的过度解释和差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Supporting nursing students with dyslexia: The situation in France in 2022 and outlook For a better understanding of the profile of nurses working in France who hold or are working toward a Ph.D: A quantitative descriptive study “It’s possible”, reducing the coercion in care for adults living with neurodevelopmental disorders: A mixed-methods study For a better understanding of the relationship between caregivers and young adults living with a concomitant substance-related mental health and substance use disorder: An integrative review The value of preventing constipation in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis: An advanced practice nursing study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1