Social Network Change after Moving into Permanent Supportive Housing: Who Stays and Who Goes?

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Network Science Pub Date : 2021-03-01 Epub Date: 2020-07-13 DOI:10.1017/nws.2020.19
Harmony Rhoades, Hsun-Ta Hsu, Eric Rice, Taylor Harris, Wichada LaMotte-Kerr, Hailey Winetrobe, Benjamin Henwood, Suzanne Wenzel
{"title":"Social Network Change after Moving into Permanent Supportive Housing: Who Stays and Who Goes?","authors":"Harmony Rhoades, Hsun-Ta Hsu, Eric Rice, Taylor Harris, Wichada LaMotte-Kerr, Hailey Winetrobe, Benjamin Henwood, Suzanne Wenzel","doi":"10.1017/nws.2020.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Social relationships are important among persons experiencing homelessness, but there is little research on changes in social networks among persons moving into permanent supportive housing (PSH). Using data collected as part of a longitudinal study of 405 adults (aged 39+) moving into PSH, this study describes network upheaval during this critical time of transition. Interviews conducted prior to and after three months of living in PSH assessed individual-level (demographics, homelessness history, health, and mental health) and social network characteristics, including network size and composition (demographics, relationship type, and social support). Interviewers utilized network member characteristics to assess whether network members were new or sustained between baseline and three months post-housing. Multilevel logistic regression models assessed characteristics of network members associated with being newly gained or persisting in networks three months after PSH move-in. Results show only one-third of social networks were retained during the transition to PSH, and veterans, African Americans, and other racial/ethnic minorities, and those living in scattered site housing, were more likely to experience network disruption. Relatives, romantic partners, and service providers were most likely to be retained after move-in. Some network change was moderated by tie strength, including the retention of street-met persons. Implications are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51827,"journal":{"name":"Network Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/nws.2020.19","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Network Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/nws.2020.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Abstract Social relationships are important among persons experiencing homelessness, but there is little research on changes in social networks among persons moving into permanent supportive housing (PSH). Using data collected as part of a longitudinal study of 405 adults (aged 39+) moving into PSH, this study describes network upheaval during this critical time of transition. Interviews conducted prior to and after three months of living in PSH assessed individual-level (demographics, homelessness history, health, and mental health) and social network characteristics, including network size and composition (demographics, relationship type, and social support). Interviewers utilized network member characteristics to assess whether network members were new or sustained between baseline and three months post-housing. Multilevel logistic regression models assessed characteristics of network members associated with being newly gained or persisting in networks three months after PSH move-in. Results show only one-third of social networks were retained during the transition to PSH, and veterans, African Americans, and other racial/ethnic minorities, and those living in scattered site housing, were more likely to experience network disruption. Relatives, romantic partners, and service providers were most likely to be retained after move-in. Some network change was moderated by tie strength, including the retention of street-met persons. Implications are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
搬进永久性支持性住房后的社会网络变化:谁留谁走?
社会关系在无家可归者中很重要,但很少有关于进入永久性支持性住房(PSH)的人的社会网络变化的研究。利用对405名进入PSH的成年人(39岁以上)进行的纵向研究的一部分收集的数据,本研究描述了在这一关键过渡时期的网络剧变。在PSH居住三个月之前和之后进行的访谈评估了个人层面的特征(人口统计、无家可归史、健康和心理健康),并包括评估网络规模和组成的社会网络部分(人口统计、关系类型、社会支持);采访者利用网络成员特征来评估网络成员在基线和住房后3个月之间是新的还是持续的。多层次逻辑回归模型评估了网络成员在进入PSH 3个月后,与新获得或坚持网络相关的特征。我们发现,在向PSH过渡期间,只有三分之一的社会网络被保留下来,退伍军人、非裔美国人和其他种族/少数民族以及居住在分散地点住房的人更有可能经历网络中断。亲戚、恋人和服务提供者最有可能在入住后留下来。一些网络变化受到关系强度的调节,包括街头熟人的保留。讨论了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Network Science
Network Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Network Science is an important journal for an important discipline - one using the network paradigm, focusing on actors and relational linkages, to inform research, methodology, and applications from many fields across the natural, social, engineering and informational sciences. Given growing understanding of the interconnectedness and globalization of the world, network methods are an increasingly recognized way to research aspects of modern society along with the individuals, organizations, and other actors within it. The discipline is ready for a comprehensive journal, open to papers from all relevant areas. Network Science is a defining work, shaping this discipline. The journal welcomes contributions from researchers in all areas working on network theory, methods, and data.
期刊最新文献
Guiding prevention initiatives by applying network analysis to systems maps of adverse childhood experiences and adolescent suicide The latent cognitive structures of social networks Algorithmic aspects of temporal betweenness When can networks be inferred from observed groups? Generating preferential attachment graphs via a Pólya urn with expanding colors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1