Semantics impacts response to phonics through spelling intervention in children with dyslexia

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Annals of Dyslexia Pub Date : 2021-06-22 DOI:10.1007/s11881-021-00233-1
Robin van Rijthoven, Tijs Kleemans, Eliane Segers, Ludo Verhoeven
{"title":"Semantics impacts response to phonics through spelling intervention in children with dyslexia","authors":"Robin van Rijthoven,&nbsp;Tijs Kleemans,&nbsp;Eliane Segers,&nbsp;Ludo Verhoeven","doi":"10.1007/s11881-021-00233-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examined the response to a phonics through spelling intervention in 52 children with dyslexia by analyzing their phonological, morphological, and orthographical spelling errors both before and after the intervention whereas their spelling errors before the intervention were compared with those of 105 typically developing spellers. A possible compensatory role of semantics on the intervention effects was also investigated. Results showed that before the intervention, children with dyslexia and the typically developing children both made most morphological errors, followed by orthographic and phonological errors. Within each category, children with dyslexia made more errors than the typically developing children, with differences being largest for phonological errors. Children with dyslexia with better developed semantic representations turned out to make less phonological, morphological, and orthographic errors compared with children with dyslexia with less developed semantic representations. The intervention for children with dyslexia led to a reduction of all error types, mostly of the orthographic errors. In addition, semantics was related to the decline in phonological, morphological, and orthographic spelling errors. This study implicates that semantic stimulation could benefit the spelling development of children at risk for or with dyslexia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"71 3","pages":"527 - 546"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11881-021-00233-1","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-021-00233-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We examined the response to a phonics through spelling intervention in 52 children with dyslexia by analyzing their phonological, morphological, and orthographical spelling errors both before and after the intervention whereas their spelling errors before the intervention were compared with those of 105 typically developing spellers. A possible compensatory role of semantics on the intervention effects was also investigated. Results showed that before the intervention, children with dyslexia and the typically developing children both made most morphological errors, followed by orthographic and phonological errors. Within each category, children with dyslexia made more errors than the typically developing children, with differences being largest for phonological errors. Children with dyslexia with better developed semantic representations turned out to make less phonological, morphological, and orthographic errors compared with children with dyslexia with less developed semantic representations. The intervention for children with dyslexia led to a reduction of all error types, mostly of the orthographic errors. In addition, semantics was related to the decline in phonological, morphological, and orthographic spelling errors. This study implicates that semantic stimulation could benefit the spelling development of children at risk for or with dyslexia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语义学通过拼写干预影响阅读障碍儿童对语音的反应
我们通过分析52名阅读障碍儿童在干预前后的语音、形态和拼写错误,研究了他们对语音拼写干预的反应,而他们在干预前的拼写错误与105名典型发展中的拼写错误进行了比较。还研究了语义对干预效果的可能补偿作用。结果显示,在干预之前,阅读障碍儿童和典型发育中的儿童都出现了最多的形态错误,其次是拼写和语音错误。在每一类中,阅读障碍儿童犯的错误都比典型发育中的儿童多,其中语音错误的差异最大。与语义表征较不发达的阅读障碍儿童相比,语义表征较发达的阅读困难儿童在语音、形态和拼写方面的错误较少。对阅读障碍儿童的干预减少了所有错误类型,主要是正字法错误。此外,语义与语音、形态和拼写错误的减少有关。这项研究表明,语义刺激有利于有阅读障碍风险或有阅读障碍的儿童的拼写发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Foveal crowding in children with developmental dyslexia. Bridging the Gap in Adult Dyslexia Research: Assessing the Efficacy of a Linguistic Intervention on Literacy Skills. Dyslexia in the 21st century: revisiting the consensus definition Exploring the feasibility of implementing the SPELL-Links to Reading and Writing intervention. Identifying students with dyslexia: exploration of current assessment methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1