Facial speech processing in children with and without dyslexia

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Annals of Dyslexia Pub Date : 2021-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s11881-021-00231-3
Martyna A. Galazka, Nouchine Hadjikhani, Maria Sundqvist, Jakob Åsberg Johnels
{"title":"Facial speech processing in children with and without dyslexia","authors":"Martyna A. Galazka,&nbsp;Nouchine Hadjikhani,&nbsp;Maria Sundqvist,&nbsp;Jakob Åsberg Johnels","doi":"10.1007/s11881-021-00231-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>What role does the presence of facial speech play for children with dyslexia? Current literature proposes two distinctive claims. One claim states that children with dyslexia make less use of visual information from the mouth during speech processing due to a deficit in recruitment of audiovisual areas. An opposing claim suggests that children with dyslexia are in fact <i>reliant</i> on such information in order to compensate for auditory/phonological impairments. The current paper aims at directly testing these contrasting hypotheses (here referred to as “mouth insensitivity” versus “mouth reliance”) in school-age children with and without dyslexia, matched on age and listening comprehension. Using eye tracking, in Study 1, we examined how children look at the mouth across conditions varying in speech processing demands. The results did not indicate significant group differences in looking at the mouth. However, correlation analyses suggest potentially important distinctions within the dyslexia group: those children with dyslexia who are better readers attended more to the mouth while presented with a person’s face in a phonologically demanding condition. In Study 2, we examined whether the presence of facial speech cues is functionally beneficial when a child is encoding written words. The results indicated lack of overall group differences on the task, although those with less severe reading problems in the dyslexia group were more accurate when reading words that were presented with articulatory facial speech cues. Collectively, our results suggest that children with dyslexia differ in their “mouth reliance” versus “mouth insensitivity,” a profile that seems to be related to the severity of their reading problems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"71 3","pages":"501 - 524"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s11881-021-00231-3","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-021-00231-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

What role does the presence of facial speech play for children with dyslexia? Current literature proposes two distinctive claims. One claim states that children with dyslexia make less use of visual information from the mouth during speech processing due to a deficit in recruitment of audiovisual areas. An opposing claim suggests that children with dyslexia are in fact reliant on such information in order to compensate for auditory/phonological impairments. The current paper aims at directly testing these contrasting hypotheses (here referred to as “mouth insensitivity” versus “mouth reliance”) in school-age children with and without dyslexia, matched on age and listening comprehension. Using eye tracking, in Study 1, we examined how children look at the mouth across conditions varying in speech processing demands. The results did not indicate significant group differences in looking at the mouth. However, correlation analyses suggest potentially important distinctions within the dyslexia group: those children with dyslexia who are better readers attended more to the mouth while presented with a person’s face in a phonologically demanding condition. In Study 2, we examined whether the presence of facial speech cues is functionally beneficial when a child is encoding written words. The results indicated lack of overall group differences on the task, although those with less severe reading problems in the dyslexia group were more accurate when reading words that were presented with articulatory facial speech cues. Collectively, our results suggest that children with dyslexia differ in their “mouth reliance” versus “mouth insensitivity,” a profile that seems to be related to the severity of their reading problems.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读障碍儿童和非阅读障碍儿童的面部言语处理
面部语言的存在对阅读障碍儿童起到了什么作用?目前的文献提出了两种不同的主张。一种说法称,由于视听区域的招募不足,患有阅读障碍的儿童在语音处理过程中较少使用来自口腔的视觉信息。一种相反的说法表明,患有阅读障碍的儿童实际上依赖这些信息来弥补听觉/语音障碍。目前的论文旨在在有和没有阅读障碍的学龄儿童中直接测试这些对比的假设(这里称为“口腔不敏感”和“口腔依赖”),在年龄和听力理解方面相匹配。在研究1中,我们使用眼动追踪,研究了儿童在不同语音处理需求的情况下如何看口腔。研究结果并没有表明在看口腔方面存在显著的群体差异。然而,相关性分析表明,阅读障碍群体中存在潜在的重要区别:那些阅读能力较强的阅读障碍儿童在面对语音要求较高的人时,会更多地注意嘴巴。在研究2中,我们研究了当孩子对书面单词进行编码时,面部语音提示的存在是否在功能上有益。研究结果表明,尽管阅读障碍组中阅读问题不太严重的人在阅读带有发音面部语音提示的单词时更准确,但在任务上缺乏整体的群体差异。总之,我们的研究结果表明,患有阅读障碍的儿童在“口腔依赖”和“口腔不敏感”方面存在差异,这似乎与他们阅读问题的严重程度有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Foveal crowding in children with developmental dyslexia. Bridging the Gap in Adult Dyslexia Research: Assessing the Efficacy of a Linguistic Intervention on Literacy Skills. Dyslexia in the 21st century: revisiting the consensus definition Exploring the feasibility of implementing the SPELL-Links to Reading and Writing intervention. Identifying students with dyslexia: exploration of current assessment methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1