The role of domestic violence in fatal mass shootings in the United States, 2014-2019.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Injury Epidemiology Pub Date : 2021-05-31 DOI:10.1186/s40621-021-00330-0
Lisa B Geller, Marisa Booty, Cassandra K Crifasi
{"title":"The role of domestic violence in fatal mass shootings in the United States, 2014-2019.","authors":"Lisa B Geller,&nbsp;Marisa Booty,&nbsp;Cassandra K Crifasi","doi":"10.1186/s40621-021-00330-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fatal mass shootings, defined as four or more people killed by gunfire, excluding the perpetrator, account for a small percentage of firearm homicide fatalities. Research has not extensively focused on the role of domestic violence (DV) in mass shootings in the United States. This study explores the role of DV in mass shootings in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 2014-2019 mass shooting data from the Gun Violence Archive, we indexed our data by year and mass shooting and collected the number of deaths and injuries. We reviewed news articles for each mass shooting to determine if it was 1) DV-related (i.e., at least one victim of a mass shooting was a dating partner or family member of the perpetrator); 2) history of DV (i.e., the perpetrator had a history of DV but the mass shooting was not directed toward partners or family members); or 3) non-DV-related (i.e., the victims were not partners or family members, nor was there mention of the perpetrator having a history of DV). We conducted descriptive analyses to summarize the percent of mass shootings that were DV-related, history of DV, or non-DV-related, and analyzed how many perpetrators died during the incidents. We conducted one-way ANOVA to examine whether there were differences in the average number of injuries or fatalities or the case fatality rates (CFR) between the three categories. One outlier and 17 cases with unknown perpetrators were excluded from our main analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 59.1% of mass shootings between 2014 and 2019 were DV-related and in 68.2% of mass shootings, the perpetrator either killed at least one partner or family member or had a history of DV. We found significant differences in the average number of injuries and fatalities between DV and history of DV shootings and a higher average case fatality rate associated with DV-related mass shootings (83.7%) than non-DV-related (63.1%) or history of DV mass shootings (53.8%). Fifty-five perpetrators died during the shootings; 39 (70.9%) died by firearm suicide, 15 (27.3%) were killed by police, and 1 (1.8%) died from an intentional overdose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most mass shootings are related to DV. DV-related shootings had higher CFR than those unrelated to DV. Given these findings, restricting access to guns by perpetrators of DV may affect the occurrence of mass shootings and associated casualties.</p>","PeriodicalId":37379,"journal":{"name":"Injury Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"38"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s40621-021-00330-0","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40621-021-00330-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Background: Fatal mass shootings, defined as four or more people killed by gunfire, excluding the perpetrator, account for a small percentage of firearm homicide fatalities. Research has not extensively focused on the role of domestic violence (DV) in mass shootings in the United States. This study explores the role of DV in mass shootings in the United States.

Methods: Using 2014-2019 mass shooting data from the Gun Violence Archive, we indexed our data by year and mass shooting and collected the number of deaths and injuries. We reviewed news articles for each mass shooting to determine if it was 1) DV-related (i.e., at least one victim of a mass shooting was a dating partner or family member of the perpetrator); 2) history of DV (i.e., the perpetrator had a history of DV but the mass shooting was not directed toward partners or family members); or 3) non-DV-related (i.e., the victims were not partners or family members, nor was there mention of the perpetrator having a history of DV). We conducted descriptive analyses to summarize the percent of mass shootings that were DV-related, history of DV, or non-DV-related, and analyzed how many perpetrators died during the incidents. We conducted one-way ANOVA to examine whether there were differences in the average number of injuries or fatalities or the case fatality rates (CFR) between the three categories. One outlier and 17 cases with unknown perpetrators were excluded from our main analysis.

Results: We found that 59.1% of mass shootings between 2014 and 2019 were DV-related and in 68.2% of mass shootings, the perpetrator either killed at least one partner or family member or had a history of DV. We found significant differences in the average number of injuries and fatalities between DV and history of DV shootings and a higher average case fatality rate associated with DV-related mass shootings (83.7%) than non-DV-related (63.1%) or history of DV mass shootings (53.8%). Fifty-five perpetrators died during the shootings; 39 (70.9%) died by firearm suicide, 15 (27.3%) were killed by police, and 1 (1.8%) died from an intentional overdose.

Conclusions: Most mass shootings are related to DV. DV-related shootings had higher CFR than those unrelated to DV. Given these findings, restricting access to guns by perpetrators of DV may affect the occurrence of mass shootings and associated casualties.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2014-2019年美国家庭暴力在致命性大规模枪击事件中的作用
背景:致命的大规模枪击,定义为四人或四人以上被枪杀,不包括肇事者,占枪支杀人死亡人数的一小部分。研究没有广泛关注家庭暴力(DV)在美国大规模枪击事件中的作用。本研究探讨家庭暴力在美国大规模枪击事件中的作用。方法:利用美国枪支暴力档案2014-2019年的大规模枪击案数据,按年份和大规模枪击案进行索引,收集死亡人数和受伤人数。我们回顾了每次大规模枪击事件的新闻报道,以确定它是否与dv有关(即,至少有一名大规模枪击事件的受害者是犯罪者的约会对象或家庭成员);2)家庭暴力史(即施暴者有家庭暴力史,但大规模枪击并非针对伴侣或家庭成员);或3)与家庭暴力无关(即受害者不是伴侣或家庭成员,也没有提到犯罪者有家庭暴力史)。我们进行了描述性分析,总结了与家庭暴力有关的大规模枪击事件的百分比,家庭暴力史,或与家庭暴力无关的百分比,并分析了有多少肇事者在事件中死亡。我们进行了单因素方差分析(one-way ANOVA)来检验这三类之间的平均受伤或死亡人数或病死率(CFR)是否存在差异。1例异常值和17例未知作案者被排除在我们的主要分析之外。结果:我们发现,2014年至2019年期间,59.1%的大规模枪击事件与家庭暴力有关,68.2%的大规模枪击事件中,肇事者要么至少杀害了一名伴侣或家庭成员,要么有家庭暴力史。我们发现,家庭暴力与家庭暴力枪击史之间的平均受伤人数和死亡人数存在显著差异,与家庭暴力相关的大规模枪击事件的平均病死率(83.7%)高于与家庭暴力无关的(63.1%)或家庭暴力枪击史(53.8%)。55名行凶者在枪击事件中死亡;39人(70.9%)死于枪支自杀,15人(27.3%)死于警察,1人(1.8%)死于故意服药过量。结论:大多数大规模枪击事件与家庭暴力有关。与DV相关的枪击事件的CFR高于与DV无关的。鉴于这些发现,限制家庭暴力行凶者获得枪支可能会影响大规模枪击事件和相关伤亡的发生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Injury Epidemiology
Injury Epidemiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
34
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Injury Epidemiology is dedicated to advancing the scientific foundation for injury prevention and control through timely publication and dissemination of peer-reviewed research. Injury Epidemiology aims to be the premier venue for communicating epidemiologic studies of unintentional and intentional injuries, including, but not limited to, morbidity and mortality from motor vehicle crashes, drug overdose/poisoning, falls, drowning, fires/burns, iatrogenic injury, suicide, homicide, assaults, and abuse. We welcome investigations designed to understand the magnitude, distribution, determinants, causes, prevention, diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and outcomes of injuries in specific population groups, geographic regions, and environmental settings (e.g., home, workplace, transport, recreation, sports, and urban/rural). Injury Epidemiology has a special focus on studies generating objective and practical knowledge that can be translated into interventions to reduce injury morbidity and mortality on a population level. Priority consideration will be given to manuscripts that feature contemporary theories and concepts, innovative methods, and novel techniques as applied to injury surveillance, risk assessment, development and implementation of effective interventions, and program and policy evaluation.
期刊最新文献
Privately made firearm in the US: results from a national survey. Extreme risk protection orders and firearm violence: a synthetic control analysis. A synthetic control study of the effects of comprehensive background check policies on non-fatal firearm crime in five states. Linkage of Medicare insurance claims to police-reported motor vehicle crashes: advancing traffic safety research in older adult populations. Public health and criminal justice funding for firearm injury prevention research in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1