Positive Synergistic Effect of Adhesives and Resin Cements Containing an Iodonium Salt on Bonding of Fiber Posts.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2021-06-05 DOI:10.3290/j.jad.b1367843
Thatiana V Leite, Diogo Henrique da Silva, Gabriela de Mello Nunes Esposo, Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar, Adriano F Lima, Giselle M Marchi
{"title":"Positive Synergistic Effect of Adhesives and Resin Cements Containing an Iodonium Salt on Bonding of Fiber Posts.","authors":"Thatiana V Leite,&nbsp;Diogo Henrique da Silva,&nbsp;Gabriela de Mello Nunes Esposo,&nbsp;Flávio Henrique Baggio Aguiar,&nbsp;Adriano F Lima,&nbsp;Giselle M Marchi","doi":"10.3290/j.jad.b1367843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the push-out bond strength (PBS) of glass-fiber posts (GFP) in different root canal zones (cervical, middle, and apical), bonded with experimental simplified adhesives (ESAs) containing different initiator systems (camphorquinone [CQ] or phenylpropanodione [PPD]) with or without diphenyl iodonium hexafluorophosphate (DPI), in combination with a DPI-containing composite cement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ESA blends were prepared with bisphenol glycidyl methacrylate (bis-GMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEG-DMA), 1,3-glycerol dimethacrylate (GDMA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and ethanol, then divided into 12 experimental groups (n = 10) according to the initiator systems (CQ, PPD, or CQ + PPD) and the presence or absence of DPI. The roots of 120 extracted bovine incisors were prepared with #5 Largo drills and the GFP were cemented with each ESA and experimental composite cements containing 0.05 mol% of DPI. The push-out bond strength (PBS) test was performed after 24 h of storage. Failure patterns were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed with split-plot two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PBS was significantly higher for DPI-containing ESAs in all regions evaluated, with the group containing 0.5 CQ + 1 PPD + 0.5 DPI exhibiting the highest PBS. There was no statistically signficant difference among groups without DPI. Most failures were classified as adhesive at the cement-dentin interface.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of an adhesive and a composite cement containing DPI salt can improve GFP bonding to root dentin, even in the apical region.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"23 3","pages":"217-222"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.b1367843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the push-out bond strength (PBS) of glass-fiber posts (GFP) in different root canal zones (cervical, middle, and apical), bonded with experimental simplified adhesives (ESAs) containing different initiator systems (camphorquinone [CQ] or phenylpropanodione [PPD]) with or without diphenyl iodonium hexafluorophosphate (DPI), in combination with a DPI-containing composite cement.

Materials and methods: ESA blends were prepared with bisphenol glycidyl methacrylate (bis-GMA), triethylene glycol dimethacrylate (TEG-DMA), 1,3-glycerol dimethacrylate (GDMA), 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and ethanol, then divided into 12 experimental groups (n = 10) according to the initiator systems (CQ, PPD, or CQ + PPD) and the presence or absence of DPI. The roots of 120 extracted bovine incisors were prepared with #5 Largo drills and the GFP were cemented with each ESA and experimental composite cements containing 0.05 mol% of DPI. The push-out bond strength (PBS) test was performed after 24 h of storage. Failure patterns were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed with split-plot two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

Results: PBS was significantly higher for DPI-containing ESAs in all regions evaluated, with the group containing 0.5 CQ + 1 PPD + 0.5 DPI exhibiting the highest PBS. There was no statistically signficant difference among groups without DPI. Most failures were classified as adhesive at the cement-dentin interface.

Conclusions: The combination of an adhesive and a composite cement containing DPI salt can improve GFP bonding to root dentin, even in the apical region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
含碘盐胶粘剂与树脂胶结剂对纤维桩粘合的正向协同作用。
目的:评价含不同引发剂体系(樟脑醌[CQ]或苯丙二酮[PPD])的实验性简化粘接剂(ESAs)与含六氟磷酸二苯碘(DPI)的复合水泥结合后,玻璃纤维桩(GFP)在不同根管区(颈、中、根尖)的推出粘结强度(PBS)。材料和方法:以双酚甲基丙烯酸甘油酯(bis-GMA)、三甘醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(TEG-DMA)、1,3-甘油二甲基丙烯酸酯(GDMA)、2-甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯(HEMA)和乙醇为原料制备ESA共混物,then根据引发剂体系(CQ、PPD或CQ + PPD)和是否存在DPI分为12个实验组(n = 10)。用5号Largo钻头制备120根牛切牙根,分别用含0.05 mol% DPI的ESA和实验复合胶合剂胶结GFP。储存24 h后进行推出粘结强度(PBS)测试。在体视显微镜下分析了失效模式。数据分析采用裂图双因素方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。结果:在所有评估区域中,含有DPI的esa的PBS均显著较高,其中含有0.5 CQ + 1 PPD + 0.5 DPI的组PBS最高。无DPI组间差异无统计学意义。大多数失效被归类为水泥-牙本质界面的粘连。结论:粘接剂与含DPI盐的复合水泥结合可改善GFP与根本质的结合,即使在根尖区域也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1